Archive for the ‘AUTHORS’ Category

Condemned to Repeat it?

Today, I woke, sat down to my first cup of coffee and found a headline that gave me the sensation of a lead weight in my stomach.

North Carolina May Declare Official State Religion Under New Bill

Republican North Carolina state legislators have proposed allowing an official state religion in a measure that would declare the state exempt from the Constitution and court rulings.

The bill, filed Monday by two GOP lawmakers from Rowan County and backed by nine other Republicans, says each North Carolina state Rep. Carl Ford backs a religion bill that would allow the state to declare an official state faith. state “is sovereign” and courts cannot block a state “from making laws respecting an establishment of religion.” The legislation was filed in response to a lawsuit to stop county commissioners in Rowan County from opening meetings with a Christian prayer, wral.com reported.

The religion bill comes as some Republican-led states seek to separate themselves from the federal government, primarily on the issues of guns and Obamacare. This includes a proposal in Mississippi to establish a state board with the power to nullify federal laws.

The North Carolina bill’s main sponsors, state Reps. Carl Ford (R-China Grove) and Harry Warren (R-Salisbury), could not be reached for comment on Tuesday, The Salisbury Post reported. Co-sponsors include House Majority Leader Edgar Starnes (R-Hickory). Another is state Rep. Larry Pittman (R-Concord), who in February introduced a state constitutional amendment that would allow for carrying concealed weapons to fight federal “tyranny.”

The bill says the First Amendment only applies to the federal government and does not stop state governments, local governments and school districts from adopting measures that defy the Constitution. The legislation also says that the Tenth Amendment, which says powers not reserved for the federal government belong to the states, prohibits court rulings that would seek to apply the First Amendment to state and local officials.

The bill reads:

SECTION 1. The North Carolina General Assembly asserts that the Constitution of the United States of America does not prohibit states or their subsidiaries from making laws respecting an establishment of religion.SECTION 2. The North Carolina General Assembly does not recognize federal court rulings which prohibit and otherwise regulate the State of North Carolina, its public schools, or any political subdivisions of the State from making laws respecting an establishment of religion.

 The North Carolina state constitution disqualifies those who do not believe in God from public office. The provision has been unenforcible since the 1961 Supreme Court decision in Torcaso v. Watkins, which prohibited such bans. (from Huffington Post)

 Remember how many times I’ve said we were headed toward a theocracy, thanks to the right wing tea party folks? It has begun.

Also yesterday, I noticed how many news stories there were about people who have softened their views on gay marriage. We have more support for that than ever, recently. Even a few (gasp) Republicans have changed their tune. While this is a very encouraging sign, we still have a formidable cadre of fundamentalists out there in positions of power, and they will continue to undermine everything that makes America great. My first thought when I saw the above-mentioned article, was that this was another example of the fallout created by gay marriage advocation. The repressed, ignorant, bible-thumping Soldiers of GAWD are at least a little frightened. Frightened that this might actually be a government “OF the People BY the people and FOR the people.” Not “of God, by God and for god” by god.

In Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address, he said, “that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.”  The first amendment to the Bill of Rights states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion…” Which is exactly what they are trying to do. Make a law respecting the establishment of religion.

Yes, many of our Founding Fathers believed in God, but they were of many different beliefs, and some were agnostic, and some had no affiliation, but it’s important to recognize that their concept of God was quite different than the concept being touted in the mainstream fundamentalist declarations. Just like the Republican party of antiquity is hardly recognizable within the modern-day Republican party. It’s crucial, then, to understand context and intent, and not just spout off things like “yeah, the constitution said we get freedom of religion.” Freedom to believe what you wish, yes. But that freedom does not extend to cramming your personal beliefs down the throats of others. And whether you understand it or not, America is a secular government predicated on the need to escape the religious rule of England. Just read about Henry the VIII and you’ll have a firm grasp of the dangers of zealotry and theocracy.burnedatstake

How would everyone feel if a state FORCED its citizens to honor ONE PARTICULAR RELIGION and its tenets WHETHER THEY BELIEVED IN IT OR NOT? I can just see the wood being piled up now–the wood that goes around that pole, where they tie up the “heretics” for a BURNING.

George Santayana famously said, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” Let us be ever mindful that now is the time to remember our history, and avoid a dangerous complacency.

This issue is also comparable to the story I posted about yesterday (GOP chairwoman Everhart, who warned that straights would start having gay marriages). I hope it’s the Fundies’ last-ditch effort to keep a foothold, and of course, I hope it fails. It has to. It’s amazing to me that they don’t see that this is exactly why America was founded…to escape this sort of theocratic control. Did they not pay attention in history class? If they want a theocracy, let them go buy some island somewhere and create their own country. We cannot let them TAKE OVER this secular government…I find this sort of legislation TREASONOUS.

Only yesterday, I posted a link to one of my newly published essay booklets…I’ve been giving them away–the downloads are free for these on Smashwords, (And hopefully Kindle will price match them too; currently Amazon/Kindle offers now selection for authors to list anything for free. We have to charge at least .99).

Anyway, in the post of this booklet from yesterday, there is an essay that addresses this very subject. I share it here:

 SHeye

Separation of Church & State

(excerpt from Unreasonable Ideas : The Etymology of Ignorance)

(c)Kelli Jae Baeli

“Secular schools can never be tolerated because such schools have no religious instruction, and a general moral instruction without a religious foundation is built on air; consequently, all character training and religion must be derived from faith…we need believing people.”
~ Adolf Hitler, Excerpted from a speech made on April 26, 1933

 

UnreasonableIdeas2013Apr1_248John Locke, an English philosopher of the 17th century, wrote about a “Social Contract” theory, in which individual conscience was left to the individual, and should never be given over to governments. This developed popularity and was eventually referred to as separation of church and state.

The phrase, “separation of church and state” stems from a letter written by Thomas Jefferson in 1802, addressed to the Danbury Baptists:

Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should “make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,” thus building a wall of separation between Church & State.

In the 1797 Treaty of Tripoli, Article 11 states, “As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion…” It can’t be much clearer than that.

Jefferson also said,

The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are 20 gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg (Jefferson, Notes).

Modern-day fundamentalists are trying to return to the Dark Ages, by infiltrating the government, forcing prayer in schools, the teaching of Intelligent Design and Creation “science” and by changing the secular government to a religious one. Fundamentalist and evangelistic adherents are more and more commonly expressing a mindset that all liberals, progressives, atheists, homosexuals and others they deem undesirables, should be carted off to an island prison somewhere in the middle of the ocean. This, because the secularists and queers among us are “trying to take over” the government.

Frank Schaeffer, New York Times best-selling author[1] and contributor to the Huffington Post, receives hate-mail all the time from the religious right. This particular one was from a priest.

Frank, I just read that you are supporting the pro-abortionist Barach [sic] Hussein Obama…Now you support a man who is the dream come true of everything ANTI-Christian. Are you no longer Christian?? I was stunned…Please respond, How could you post on the Huffington Post, the most anti-Christian, anti-traditional site?? These people HATE everything Christianity stands for!

In Christ,

Father G. (Shaeffer).

Don’t you love how the hateful, racist diatribe, baiting with the emphasis on the president’s middle name, ends with “In Christ”? This should be a clue. Being in Christ means being hateful and disingenuous.

The fatal error here, is that the government was created as secular, and it’s the Extreme Right that is seeking a takeover. It’s time for the general public to recognize this, and stop allowing the fanatics to redefine everything to their liking.

Still think the religious zealots aren’t trying to take over our government?

“We have enough votes to run the country. And when the people say, ‘We’ve had enough,’ we are going to take over.” ~ Pat Robertson, speech given to the April, 1980 “Washington for Jesus” rally, quoted from Robert Boston, The Most Dangerous Man in America, p. 29

Nobody has the right to worship on this planet any other God than Jehovah. And therefore the state does not have the responsibility to defend anybody’s pseudo-right to worship an idol.” ~Rev. Joseph Morecraft, Chalcedon Presbyterian Church, “Biblical Role of Civil Government” speech given 8/31/93 at Biblical Worldview and Christian Education Conference.

“This is God’s world, not Satan’s. Christians are the lawful heirs, not non-Christians.” ~Gary North, Political Polytheism: The Myth of Pluralism (Tyler, TX: Institute for Christian Economics, 1989), p. 102.

“We need a legal strategy which protects the rights of those of us who hold Christian convictions which will afford us the opportunity to contend once again for the mind of this culture.” ~Keith A. Fournier, ACLJ brochure “Religious Cleansing.”

“If Christian people work together, they can succeed during this decade in winning back control of the institutions that have been taken from them over the past 70 years. Expect confrontations that will be not only unpleasant but at times physically bloody…This decade will not be for the faint of heart, but the resolute. Institutions will be plunged into wrenching change. We will be living through one of the most tumultuous periods of human history. When it is over, I am convinced God’s people will emerge victorious.” ~Pat Robertson, Pat Robertson’s Perspective Oct-Nov 1992.

“America is under the judgment of God. And if we are ever going to rebuild this country, it must be under God’s law. Our goal must be simple: We must have a Christian nation built on God’s law, on the Ten Commandments. No apologies.” ~Randall Terry, Operation Rescue, address to “Cities of Refuge” campaign, Willoughby Hills, OH, July, 1993.

“We at the Christian Coalition are raising an army who cares. We are training people to be effective—to be elected to school boards, to city councils, to state legislatures, and to key positions in political parties…By the end of this decade, if we work and give and organize and train, THE CHRISTIAN COALITION WILL BE THE MOST POWERFUL POLITICAL ORGANIZATION IN AMERICA. ~ Pat Robertson, in a fundraising letter, July 4, 1991.[2]

Perhaps if they dislike this government and its secular nature so much, they ought to remove themselves to that very island. That way, they could set up the kind of government that doesn’t offend their extremist sensibilities and they can flagellate themselves into oblivion, while the rest of us can get on with our lives. Those free lives guaranteed to us by those Founding Fathers in their original documents.

A time machine is needed, so that we can send the zealots back to the 16th century, where they will be allowed to do those things.

Clearly, the Founding Fathers intended for religion to remain separate from government. Separation of church and State was included because they wanted to avoid the persecutions in England by those of religious bent. The United States Constitution is also clear about this matter, yet there are myriad examples of its violation.

As a society, we actually entertain the idea of having creationism taught as fact in our schools.

In Alabama, biology textbooks carry a warning that says that evolution is “a controversial theory some scientists present as a scientific explanation for the origin of living things…No one was present when life first appeared on Earth. Therefore, any statement about life’s origins should be considered as theory, not fact.” [3] In Alabama, it seems, if you wake up to snow on the ground, but no one saw it snowing, then you may only propose a “theory” as to the origin of the snow (Carroll).

When we vote, we often have to go to a church to do so. When we go to ballgames, we must listen to some local pastor say a prayer; when we enter the halls of government buildings, we must pass by marble displays of the biblical Ten Commandments; when our tax dollars go to the upkeep of faith-based schools; when we celebrate a National Day of Prayer; when we pay for something with money that has “In God We Trust” stamped on it; when our children recite the Pledge of Allegiance, to include “One nation, under God”; and when the newly elected President of the United States is inaugurated, and has to place his hand on a Bible to take his oath of office. All these things are examples of the lack of church and state separation.

The proper place for the study of religious beliefs is in a church or temple, at home, or in a course on comparative religions, but not in a biology class. There is no place in our world for an ideology that seeks to close minds, force obedience, and return the world to a paradise that never was. Students should learn that the universe can be confronted and understood, that ideas and authority should be questioned, that an open mind is a good thing. Education does not exist to confirm people’s superstitions, and children do not learn to think when they are fed only dogma” (Berra).

James Madison was the primary author of the Bill of Rights, and in it, he also reiterated the importance of separation of church and state. Jefferson echoed this sentiment in the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom.

Though these words exist as underpinning to our dealings with religion and service, it is near impossible for a person of no faith to get elected.

In the 2008 elections, Republican candidate for North Carolina senate, Elizabeth Dole, ran an “attack ad” which labeled her opponent, Kay Hagan “godless.” At the end of the ad, a woman’s voice is heard saying “There is no god.” This was an underhanded way to implicate Hagen as an unworthy candidate, even though the recording was not of Hagen. Dole has since been sued by Hagen for liable and defamation, and Hagen felt the need to run her own ad professing her Christianity. Dole, incidentally, lost the race.

This is another example of how religion permeates our society, even in the realm of politics. I fail to see the correlation between lack of religion and an inability to serve honorably, but most Americans don’t seem to agree. The reason seems to be that “godless” people are somehow less trustworthy, less moral, less ethical and less capable of serving in an office that seeks to represent the common good.

There are many historical figures who recognize this misrepresentation, and agree. One of them said,

“I believe in an America where the separation of church and state is absolute; where no Catholic prelate would tell the President—should he be Catholic—how to act, and no Protestant minister would tell his parishioners for whom to vote; where no church or church school is granted any public funds or political preference, and where no man is denied public office merely because his religion differs from the President who might appoint him, or the people who might elect him.”

This, from one of our nation’s most beloved public servants, John F. Kennedy, the 35th President of the United States of America. And he was, as is common knowledge, a practicing Catholic.

Susan Jacoby, a respected atheist, secularist, bestselling author and director of the Center for Inquiry, New York, has said,

…people who belong to no Church make up the fastest-growing segment of the American population. In the 1980s, no more than 8 per cent refused to identify a religious affiliation. This year, the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life found that the ranks of the unchurched had doubled. Highly educated Americans are most likely to fall within a group ranging from atheists to those describing their religion as “nothing in particular.”

There is a powerful correlation between fundamentalism and lack of education. According to Pew, 45 per cent of Americans with no education beyond high school adhere to biblical literalism, while only 29 per cent with some university education—and 19 per cent of university graduates—share that old-time faith. Republicans have tapped into the fundamentalist resentment of educated, sceptical elites to form the party’s right-wing Christian base (Religion Remains).

The motto of the American people, “In God We Trust,” was not adopted as the national slogan until 1956, though most Americans seem to think it was minted on the first coin after the Declaration of Independence was signed. Indeed, the majority in society seem to respond to God very much like the subjects in the Emperor’s New Clothes. They don’t dare question their ruler, though it is blatantly obvious he is behaving scandalously and is a ridiculous excuse for a leader.

I hope to one day be called to testify in a court of law, because when they say “Raise your right hand…do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help you God?” I will say, “not so help me, God, no.”

I will enjoy the tittering and mumbling moving through the spectators. The judge will lean over and say, “Why not, Ms. Baeli?”

And I will say, “I believe in the separation of church and state. This court is state. That Bible is church. Furthermore, I’m an atheist. But I’ll be happy to swear on the value of my own ethics.”

=========================

[1] *author of the forthcoming Patience With God: Faith For People Who Don’t Like Religion (Or Atheism) and also of Crazy for God: How I Grew Up as One of the Elect, Helped Found the Religious Right, and Lived to Take All (or Almost All) of It Back.
[2]For more quotes like these, refer to Supernatural Hypocrisy: The Cognitive Dissonance of a God Cosmology (Volume 4, Cosmology of the Dark Side).
[3] Also, please note that they do not apply this argument to their own statements about how life began, and what happened all that time ago. Hypocrites.

Be the first to like.

Lesbian Readers & Writers

Another writer friend of mine recently posted a blog about the inordinate amount of winking that goes on in lesbian fiction.

I had to think about that….I know what she means. There are always some little irritants with those books…I just haven’t read a bad one in so long…because I…sort of…avoid bad books whenever possible. As for the winking…I may not have noticed this in lesbian books, because I really don’t read much lesfic (And like Diana, I hate that word too…in fact, I really don’t even like the word lesbian. Never have. But I guess we’re stuck with it).

catreading1Anyway, the reason I stopped reading lesbian books was because I was so frequently and so profoundly disappointed in them. (and in fact, it was the reason I started writing novels–I was so dissatisfied with lesbian fiction, and I wanted to write a book *I* would want to read).  Now, granted, I probably haven’t read enough of them to have an unbiased view–definitely not a scientific sampling….but after trying repeatedly, and finding that 9 out of 10 of them were awful, I just went back to writers I knew and respected. And yes, most of them are mainstream authors, not lesbians. I cut my literary teeth on Edgar Rice Burroughs, Edgar Allen Poe, Darian North, Raymond Obstfeld/Laramie Dunaway, Robert A. Heinlein, Dean Koontz, (and yes, some Stephen King); and most recently am enjoying Nelson DeMille and Michael Robotham. The only lesbian writer I read nowadays is Kate Genet. Yes, she’s my partner, but just know, dear reader, that I felt this way about her writing before we met, and in fact, that’s how we met. We both appreciated each other’s writing. I seem to recall liking Curious Wine quite a lot, but that’s been so long ago…and I liked books by Gabriella Goldsby and Georgia Beers….But I always know that I will not be disappointed with Kate’s work. She is brilliant, in my humble opinion. She just seems to write in lesbian sub-genres that aren’t all the rage with the masses of readers, and so doesn’t get the kudos she deserves, as far as I’m concerned. I’m sure there are some high quality lesbian writers out there, but I guess I just gave up trying to find them.

Insofar as feeling some obligation to read authors who are also SAPPHIC–I mean, who wants to slog through womanreadingbadkindlebad books, when you can just stop reading and look for something else you can really enjoy? I will never live long enough to read all the GOOD books I want to read, so if the first two pages make me roll my eyes, I put it away and look elsewhere. With the advent of self-publishing, anyone who thinks they can write, can publish, without ever paying their dues, honing their craft. I know. I have been writing for something like 25 years, and I rewrote every book I have until I could be proud of it, applying all I’d learned to make it the best book it could be. I can go back and read through my first manuscripts and literally CRINGE at the mistakes I made; how truly amateurish it was. So I kept writing, kept studying the craft of writing, paying attention to the writing of those I admired–studying them, and kept applying that learning to those stories of mine. And that process will never end. There will always be something else to learn, to make me a better writer.

Curiously, I think there is this concept among lesbian readers (and some lesbian writers) that lesbian fiction is some type of sacred cow–and should never be criticized or spoken ill of, which means, they should not be held to the same standards as all other examples of “good” writing. I wonder why that is? I won’t defend a book or give it a five star review unless I really feel it is excellent. If I am not impressed with it or even hate it, I don’t bother with a review at all. To me, posting a horrid review is less about reviewing the work, and more about making yourself feel superior in public. And besides, I don’t see the value in trashing someone else’s work. I wouldn’t want anyone to trash mine. Call it a professional courtesy. But that doesn’t mean I won’t speak my mind on my own blog. That’s what it’s for. I just won’t post it under that author’s Amazon or Smashwords listing.

Having said that, I will mention that as treacherous as these waters can be, I find most lesbian romances to be cheesy and puerile, with no regard for clever plotting, character development, or style. I stopped reading het romances for JUST THAT REASON. I usually abhor formula fiction of any kind, and the romance genre is replete with every example of what NOT to do if you want to write a really good book. Great sales and great writing aren’t always on the same tandem bicycle. Sometimes, it’s simply that there are fewer discerning readers out there, and quite a few readers who are easily impressed or entertained. I take my vocation seriously, and I wish they would too. For one thing, it would be nice if these mediocre or bad writers would learn about mechanics, spelling, grammar, sentence structure, story arc, and…how about a fresh, unique premise every now and again?

talk thru handOkay, I have probably pissed off some people by now, so maybe I should hush. It’s really awful to have to mince words simply because it might alienate someone who could be a potential reader. But then again, do I want those types as my readers? If those readers who are now huffing and puffing and busting a vein on their foreheads would give it a bit of thought, they’d see that they should be glad that I care that much about the quality of my own work. I hold myself and others to the same standard, and it’s because I want every reader to get to the end of my books and feel satisfied, knowing their time and money was not wasted.

This whole business is so populated with irony, these days, I can hardly stand it.

2 people like this post.

Thatness & Whatness – being snarky

Bound to happen….don’t know why I’m surprised. I’ve been publishing excerpts intended to market thatness&whatness2013Apr1_248Supernatural Hypocrisy. Someone just gave me a pissy little review on one of them a while ago, so I went to his site and left one of my own. Amazing what people do.

His review was on Thatness & Whatness, and only said
“Review by: Brent Adams on March 31, 2013 : star
Not impressed. Doesn’t seem well thought out or researched.”

So I looked at his wordpress site, and it was one of those generic, newly made ones with all the defaults still up, and I left a snarky comment:

“Kelli Jae Baeli on April 1, 2013 at 3:49 am said:
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Your site “doesn’t seem well-thought out or researched.” How does that feel?
Before you slam someone else’s work on smashwords, perhaps you should read the whole book rather than an excerpt–and as for your comments, it took 3 years of research-something like 475 references from reputable sources, and it was nothing BUT well-thought out and researched. I spent my whole life compiling for that book, and working on it, to some degree, and also studied under a bible scholar. So how about you keep your opinion to yourself until you know what you’re talking about?”

I just get so weary of that sort of thing. Sigh. It’s a shame that reviews can be posted by just anyone, whether they’re qualified or not, these days. In the golden yesteryears, one had to be educated in the subject area and hold a position as a reviewer with some reputable entity, before posting reviews. I guess those days are over. I do appreciate responses and reviews from readers, but sometimes, I wonder if we’d be better off without them.

1 person likes this post.

1st Review of Jael.In a Tent. With a Spike.

SHcomplete6vol_138Recently, I’ve been trying to market my 6 volume magnum opus, Supernatural Hypocrisy: The Cognitive Dissonance of a God Cosmology, as I am in the unique position of being a relatively small fish in a big pond, where that material is concerned.

Since I am no Sam Harris or Richard Dawkins or Christopher Hitchens, my name alone will not sell a book–especially one like this.I do mention this in the Author’s Note:

I am not a Bible scholar or a Ph.D.–wielding lecturer, nor a scientist. I was one semester away from a degree in Professional Writing & Editing, and intend to finish it, plus complete a Masters Degree program in writing as well, soon. The actual writing and life in general seem to have interfered with my academic pursuits. Other than that, I am just an author who is many other things, not the least of which is a voracious lifelong learner and seeker of truth. Though I have, at odd intervals, been accused of being an elitist—I think an elitist would not encourage the sharing of ideas by those without an alphabet soup after their name, a prestigious university at their back, or a mainstream publisher hawking their work. I believe everyone has something to say, and should be able to say it. It should be up to the readers whether or not the content is worthy of perusal.

In an effort to get the information out there, I decided to offer excerpts for free in eBook form, so that readers would have a chance to preview some of the material; see what the book is like, before buying. Yesterday, I published another of those excerpts, Jael. In a Tent. With a Spike –which is excerpted from Volume 4, Cosmology Of The Dark Side: Hell, Satan & Misguided Jael.InaTent.withaSpike2013Mar30_232x344Adherents. The blurb for it is:

Directed at agnostics and those struggling with the inconsistencies in Christianity in particular, and religion in general, an author struggles to find her own Personal Cosmology by examining and sharing her beliefs and discoveries about God, the Bible and Christianity.

In this excerpt, Baeli responds to an online pastor’s site. “During some research, I came across a page that stopped me in my cyber-tracks. It’s the most hateful, war-mongering, misogynistic, atavistic, hate-crime supporting, and sickening example of Christian brainwashing I’ve ever seen. And it’s intended for kids.”

When I woke to start my day this morning, there was a Review Notification from Smashwords. Already? My first thought was, Okay, here we go. Some Bible-thumper is going to lambast me with admonitions and warnings that I will burn in their loving god’s hell for such blasphemy.…so it was a pleasant surprise to instead see this:

Review by: David H. Keith on March 30, 2013 : star star star star star
At last, someone with the courage to take these charlatans and hate-mongers to task, and to do it with eloquence and the sarcasm these would-be “holy” men so richly deserve. Good on you, Ms. Baeli! Good on you.

Of course, you do know that you are now the target of all these soldiers of their Ghod, don’t you? Well, you are not alone. It is way past time these criminals are called to account and you have done so with effect. My hat is off to you.

Five stars without hesitation.

David H. Keith
www.novemberfirstpublications.weebly.com

My thanks to Mr. Keith.

I know there are plenty of people out there who are at least agnostic, whether they know it or not. And there are plenty of others who have always questioned the veracity of religion, but these days, who has the time to research it? Well, since I am a writer, and I did have the time, and I was on my own personal journey in that regard, I felt it was a good idea to get a book out of it. I just never imagined the books would have to be 6 volumes, and take me 3 years, off and on, to write. I had to take breaks from the project, because it was so overwhelming. I studied more disciplines in that span of time than in all my college years combined.

Anyway, I suppose releasing these free eBooks is a way of directing people toward a purchase of this book I worked so hard on, and don’t have the big name to sell much of.

There are two more available, so far as well…

The First Family (Adam & Eve & Sons)

and Science Vs. The Flood

 

 

Be the first to like.

Average Morning Weirdness

This morning, I rolled over to greet my honey, as she sat down on the bed (she almost always rises before I do). I heard three pops–one in my right shoulder, one in my neck, one in my left shoulder.

I made some comment like, “Oh, my crunchy joints…they pop in sequence…it’s like dominoes. I have Domino Bones.”

Then, I realized how much I liked the phrase.

Domino Bones.

“Sounds like the name of a canyon in Montana,” I say. Then put on my announcer voice: “They were lost in the canyon of Domino Bones and had to cut off all their arms and legs to survive…stay tuned for the next chapter of::: [dramatic pause] Domino Bones!”

I like that phrase…some phrases are just fun to say. “They fall trippingly off the tongue,” I said, quoting Shakespeare. And then I realized that Trippingly Off the Tongue would make a great title…for something…I’m sort of a title-whore.
dominoesBut back to Domino Bones…and a fondness for interesting phrases and words…

It’s sort of like when you’re typing particular words…my fingers like the feel of certain combinations of letters. I can type them faster…and it feels good. They fall trippingly off the fingers I guess. I can’t recall which typed words right now…I only notice when I type one of them, and think Oh, that’s one of the words I like to type…

So here I was, writing these weird thoughts down in OneNote…because somehow, some way, I will eventually use them in a book…(see, I’m already using them in a blog). I have thousands of tidbit files…

Anyway, when I sat down at my desk to write all this down, I found a folded piece of paper and realized my darling had left me a love note. Again. How lucky am I to have found someone so perfect for me, who is also a writer and also does things like leave love notes at my desk for me to find…

After I jotted down the weirdness above into a tidbit file in OneNote, I went into the bathroom where my love was having a shower…

I moved up toward the frosted* glass door and pressed my face against it and she gave a little scream. I slid open the door to apologize…she is saying “bloody hell! You scared the shit out of me…”

“I’m sorry baby…” Yes, I’m laughing, even though it might be cruel. Then again, I can’t help it if she has a hypersensitive startle-response, can I? I continue with, “I just wanted to tell you that I got your love note…”

She still has a hand to her chest, taking calming breaths, the steam hovering around her.

“And so I thought the proper thing to do was to come in here and scare you to death.”

Then, I decided to just blog all this, but got distracted for something like two hours by Pinterest. I even created a couple new boards–like I need more of them. Pinterest is so addictive. I’m just proud of myself for actually getting around to writing a blog. I’ve been doing that a lot, lately…just noodling around, and getting very little of consequence done. But that’s how an average morning is for me, unless I wake up with paragraphs of writing in my head I must jot down, thanks to all the well-feeding I do between book projects.

My baby brought me crumpets with jam, which I enjoyed with my coffee, and I’m thinking, My life is pretty damn good.

_______

*A group of text that wants to be a Footnote: *I originally put the word “cloudy” in parentheses so I could find the right word for the type of glass in a shower door. I wound up on the wisegeek website and they had a popup slideshow of interesting facts to distract me for far too long Did you know Butterflies taste with their feet?

**Another group of text that wants to be another footnote: * I tried to find an image to use with this post, and discovered that there is a band with the name Domino Bones. Who knew.

Be the first to like.

Irony-Fest on Giving it Away

criticnametagWelcome to the Irony-Fest, please sign in and wear your name tags.

This topic has become a comedy of ironies.

Herein lies the oft-repeated back-handed compliments and erroneous and mixed opinions we authors often deal with, in relation to our work. It seems that some readers just don’t understand nor appreciate what authors are offering, and why. And they don’t seem to understand the function of short works in this regard. Would that we could be treated with the same respect that other professions enjoy, without  suffering the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune.

In one blog, Distracting Fiction: Brand Vs. Generic, I tackled the criticism of including brand names of things in my stories,  in another, Diversify & Die, I address the challenges of marketing yourself and why I started concentrating on writing in just one major genre, and in another, Stranger Fiction, Reviews & Truthiness, I said “Historically, there has been a notable chasm between the author’s craft and the reading public’s knowledge of what that craft includes” and discussed the odd complaints of readers who missed critical nuances and story elements, and in Bloody Hands, I revealed the intensely personal emotional development a writer must have in order to write well, and the abject vulnerability that revealing yourself on the page entails.

Imagine my dismay when, in the second review of Giving it Away : Spoilers as Both Noun & Accusation (Why Book Reviews Matter & How to Write a Proper One), I found:

Review by: (MT) on March 19, 2013 : star star star star
This book is 10 pages and 20+ promotional pages for the author’s other work. It is a short read. It goes a little long on don’t give away spoilers. The meat of the book for me was in two pages. The author gives useful tips on doing reviews. Which I plan to use in the future when reviewing ficiton. Thanks for your work. Your other books look interesting as well.
(review of free book)

In the first review, this:

Review by: DHK on March 19, 2013 : star star star starstar 

I found this book timely, although a bit vague and short on specifics. I’m not knocking the book – it’s only some 5100 words long, after all – but simply saying Baeli could have done more with it even if that entailed a much larger book. I think the topic itself – writing thoughtful reviews – is certainly something that needs addressing and I applaud Baeli for beginning that conversation. I hope she expands it into something a new reviewer can keep readily to hand just as one should a good dictionary or manual for one’s primary job.

DHK
(Website)

Yes, the MT review, she gave it 4-stars, (thank you) and she did say something nice in the last few sentences, (thanks again) but also seemed troubled by the fact that the article was short, and had promotional material in it.  [IRONY ALERT] she also said at the end of the review that my other books looked interesting…um, wasn’t that the material at the back of the book she complained about? I included that extra data for both marketing reasons, and because [IRONY ALERT] I wanted to be able to toss more in there for the reader, so it wouldn’t seem they were getting nothing for something, even though they were actually getting something for nothing, because the eArticle was FREE.

Then she said it also  “goes a little long on don’t give away spoilers” when [IRONY ALERT] the article was ABOUT SPOILERS.

Why do some readers seem offended when we add information in the back of the book about our other work? Do they not understand that this is our vocation, and the goal is to sell the creations we toil over? Don’t we have the same right as others to advertise the fruits of our talent and hard work? And when we offer some of our writing for free in order to do that, why is that such a burr under their saddles? And why do they seem pissy that a SHORT work of say, 10 pages, is not LONGER, when it’s not intended to be a thorough examination of a subject, and the download of it is even FREE????

bangheadwall1

 

In the FIVE star DHK review, he said the “book” was “a bit vague…” (when there was nothing vague about it, even though I had said in the book blurb, “This is one time when you should be vague.”) Isn’t it ironic? Doncha think?

He also said the article was “short on specifics”  while the MT review said it “goes a little long on don’t give away spoilers” (when that was indeed the TOPIC of the article). DHK said, “Baeli could have done more with it even if that entailed a much larger book”  when it wasn’t a book, but a short article, and the intent, clearly stated, was that it was a micro-topic, not a topic under a microscope.

As I said in the previous blog post, I don’t have TIME to devote to expanding nonfiction subjects, even though I have published quite a few nonfiction books, with a list of them still sitting unfinished, as I am busy writing full-length novels, for which I hope to get quality reviews from those who know how to properly WRITE a review, which is what this article was about. If they want full-length works exclusively, I could point them to 33 of my other BOOKS.

Oh, and did I mention that the article WAS FREE?

All this, after a collection of respected and qualified authors posted thanks and kudos for what I was sharing in that article, the author and board member of Lambda Literary Foundation, KG MacGregor, sent me an email saying “Thanks so much for your blog on spoiler reviews. As a board member at Lambda Literary Foundation, I forwarded it to our LL Review editor and asked him to share it with our reviewers. That’s the best set of questions I’ve ever seen!”

So much for the mistaken concept that you can please everyone, which is also something I said in the article:

But remember that we writers can’t please everyone, we can only write the stories we feel compelled to write, and hope there are those who are interested in reading them. And more importantly, writing well is hard work; we pour ourselves into the job, and we have feelings, just like you do.

And in the blog before this, I asked the burning question: Ironically, I wonder what the reviews for his publication will be like?

I’m beginning to think that we authors need a place to review the reviews  on our books. Hardly seems fair that the public at large can say what they want about our work, even if it’s erroneous or misinterpreted, and we just have to sit there like we’re in the dunking booth at the county fair.

Be the first to like.

Giving it Away:1st review

So, got the first review on the eArticle I published today on Smashwords. The article is

Giving it Away : Spoilers as Both Noun & Accusation
(Why Book Reviews Matter & How to Write a Proper One)

 

Creativity GivingitAway2013Mar18_138Review by: David H. Keith on March 19, 2013 : starstarstarstarstar
I found this book timely, although a bit vague and short on specifics. I’m not knocking the book – it’s only some 5100 words long, after all – but simply saying Baeli could have done more with it even if that entailed a much larger book.

I think the topic itself – writing thoughtful reviews – is certainly something that needs addressing and I applaud Baeli for beginning that conversation. I hope she expands it into something a new reviewer can keep readily to hand just as one should a good dictionary or manual for one’s primary job.

David H. Keith
www.novemberfirstpublications.weebly.com

I wanted to write to the reviewer, David H. Keith, and thank him, but most of his links don’t work, and could not find any contact info for him elsewhere…so thought i would respond here.

First, if you find this, thanks for your review, David. Next, let me just point out that it wasn’t a “book” I published, but an article which was necessarily brief. I wish I had had the time to commit to expanding the idea, but I’ve been very busy writing full-length books, ironically. LOL. And nonfiction is something I’m trying to spend less time on, as I’ve made a commitment to fiction for now. As for the article being vague–not sure what was vague about it, but I suppose you can’t please everyone, which is something i mentioned, again ironically, in the article to which David refers.

Nonetheless, I’m glad he was able to eke out some value in the article, and I appreciate his taking time to jot off a review. Stay tuned. This is shaping up to be an expanding discussion. One can only hope it gains meme status, so that hard-working authors can be treated with the respect they deserve.

Toodles.

Jae

Be the first to like.

Giving it Away Giveaway

In response to the unusual interest paid to one of my recent blogs, Giving it Away: Spoilers as Both Noun & Accusation,

I decided I  would publish that entry in digital form, so I could spread the word. I will be offering it for free download –that’s right: Giving it Away, will be GIVEN AWAY>

on Smashwords, and on Amazon, too, hoping they match the FREE price. Otherwise, Amazon might list it for .99 at first. But I felt this information was too important, and it needed to be available to those who would write book reviews.

from the article:

Author’s Note

ThiCreativity GivingitAway2013Mar18_138s article stemmed from an ongoing issue with book reviews. It became apparent that most reviewers did not understand what the intent of book reviews were, nor how to write a proper one. Even in the case of positive reviews, often the reviewer would accomplish something counter-productive, by including spoilers that kept other readers from buying a book, or enjoying it. A great deal of the enjoyment to be found in fiction, is through the author’s ability to surprise the reader with plot twists and turns. If the reviewer reveals all of these in a review, the story is then compromised, and this leads to fewer sales for the hard-working, conscientious author, and an undermining of other reader’s ability to fully enjoy the story. I have made this article free for purchase through various vendors, in the hope that it will help alleviate at least a portion of this ongoing modern problem in the area of fiction and book publishing.

 

Title: Giving it Away : Spoilers as Both Noun & Accusation (Why Book Reviews Matter, & How to Write a Proper One)

Description: Good authors spend a lot of energy and time on constructing a plot and providing surprises to keep the reader engaged and entertained– when you come along and tell those twists and turns and outcomes, you have just spoiled it for anyone else–which is why it’s called a SPOILER. This is one time when you should be vague.

Ironically, I wonder what the reviews for his publication will be like?

typingsmile

 

 

 

2 people like this post.

Giving it Away: Spoilers as Both Noun & Accusation

Directly out of the chute, let me say this is coming from myself as both a writer and a reader. One compelling reason (among others) that I became an author, was due to my disappointment in the offerings of a certain genre. I wanted to write books *I* would want to read. I launched myself into this vocation with little knowledge of what that decision would bring. I had no way of knowing the degree of vulnerability that publishing my writing would entail.

VulnerablePublishing a book is very much like being naked in public. So it’s difficult not to take it personally, when someone makes a comment on it. I try to take my own advice; I’ve said,

“It’s not so much that you need a thick skin, it’s that you have to realize it’s NOT your skin.”

One of those things easier said than done.

One thing that makes that challenge more formidable is the free-for-all that is the book review. It’s unfortunate that so many book reviewers don’t seem to understand what a review’s purpose is. In simplistic terms, a book review is meant to inform a potential reader of the merits (and sometimes, demerits) of a book, so that they can make an informed decision about whether or not to read it. A review is NOT a soapbox, a torture-chamber, nor an opportunity to elevate yourself above someone who does something you have never done yourself. Also, if you are not reading in a genre you like to begin with, you have no business doing a review.

In an odd offshoot of this, I once had a reviewer who bashed one of my books because she bought the WRONG BOOK in a genre she did not like, and proceeded to list everything she bookburnhated about it. That’s neither fair to the writer, nor fair to the potential reader. The book was clearly described on the information page, the title was similar to the book the reviewer sought, yet NOT THE SAME TITLE, which was intentional, yet it was obvious the genre to which it belonged was ignored, and the blurb wasn’t read at all before the purchase.

I notice when I’m doing any marketing for my books, that there are excerpts I want to share because I feel they are particularly interesting, even out of context, or are examples of the tone of the book, or create tension in the reader, making them want more, or it reveals a character that might be engaging. The problem is, the scenes that I feel are best at any of those things, usually involve a spoiler. I can’t share them, because it would give away some twist that I worked so hard to develop in the process of composing the book.

Readers who do book reviews, are charged with the same sensibility. Would you go up to someone and say, “Let me tell you this hysterical punch-line..and then, I’m sure you will want announcemegaphoneto hear the whole joke.” Or would you say, “I just saw this wonderful movie where the bad guy dies by being impaled with a swordfish, and the main character is really Sally, the other character, but she has two personalities, and her mother really isn’t her mother, but her sister, and this is how she finds out such-and-such….”

I hope you would answer NO. I would not do that. If you didn’t give that answer, then please, I beg of you, don’t review my books. I spend a good deal of time on the plot, and the twists in that plot, and I always try to do something with it that is unexpected and clever. When you blab all that to other readers, then why would they want to read the book, when they already know all the surprises? Some writers are trying to make a living with their work, just like you are. How would you like it if someone came to your job and told everyone something that kept you from getting paid?

There are plenty of bad writers out there, that much is true. But if you can’t find something nice to say, don’t do a review. As the saying goes, everyone’s a critic. I have always admired this quote, for those reasons.

“It is not the critic who counts: not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who errs and comes up short again and again, because there is no effort without error or shortcoming, but who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, who spends himself for a worthy cause; who, at the best, knows, in the end, the triumph of high achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who knew neither victory nor defeat.”

~Theodore Roosevelt, “Citizenship in a Republic,” Speech at the Sorbonne, Paris, April 23, 1910

A conscientious writer’s face is always marred by sweat and dirt and blood, but it’s because writingishardthey are actually DOING SOMETHING. It’s really easy to slam a book, but then, you have made it about YOU and not the book, and that’s not what reviews are for. The bad writers don’t develop much of a following except among readers who are easily pleased, or uneducated enough to require very little in their entertainment; good writers tend to get more reviews, and reviews, in turn, sell books. Whether fair or not, there’s either a readership for a certain book, or there is not, regardless of the intellect of those readers. So bashing an author or a book serves no purpose other than to make the reviewer feel better. If you didn’t like a book, just stop buying that author’s work. Simple as that. No need to inflict injury.

Don’t attack the author. You don’t know the author, and whether or not she was trying to illustrate a deeper point; and unless you are highly educated and shrewd, that point may have been lost on you, or you might have missed important details that are indeed handled well, but simply overlooked by you. (For more in this area, see Stranger Fiction, Reviews & Truthiness. )

As I mentioned above, Don’t be a spoiler. Good authors spend a lot of energy and time on constructing a plot and providing surprises to keep the reader engaged and entertained– when you come along and tell those twists and turns and outcomes, you have just spoiled it for anyone else–which is why it’s called a SPOILER.  This is one time when you should be vague.

Thus, when you are writing a review, dear reader, don’t give away plot twists, surprises, nor the ending of a book. Have you ever seen a movie trailer or the blurb on the back of the DVD for a movie? Did you notice that they entice you, but don’t tell you what happens? Think of it like that. It’s a teaser, not an unveiling.

Accordingly, don’t simply give a summary of the events in a book. You’re not in Junior High School doing a report. You are sharing what you liked about the book, not just paraphrasing the story the author tells. Telling the story is the author’s job; yours, as a reviewer, is to tell how you felt about that story, not to give an alternate or paraphrased synopsis of the plot.

Pretend you are telling a friend about the book, with the objective of enticing them to read it. You wouldn’t want to give anything away, but you want to convince them it’s worth reading.

You can do this in your reviews by providing such things as:

excitedreaderYour opinion on the characters. Are the characters interesting? Do you care about them? Are they authentic? Do they remind you of anyone you know, or other characters from other books?

How does this book compare to others that you’ve read in this genre? Is something done differently or particularly well?

What other authors does this author remind you of?

What was the narrative voice like in the book? First person? Third person omniscient, third person limited, or a combination of any of them? Did this point of view work well for the story?

What was the writer’s style? Dry? Witty? Colorful? Picturesque?

Who was your favorite character and why?

Were there unexpected twists and turns, if so, mention them, but do not give details. For instance, instead of saying “The story is about a professor who drugs and rapes his students” say, “The main character has a dark secret, and he intends to keep it that way.”

Did the story engage your senses? Were you immersed in the story, and did it make you want to keep reading?

Was the book realistic? Did the author demonstrate a command of the subject-matter, or did it seem contrived, implausible, trite, and one-dimensional?

What was the pacing like? Did it read fast or slow? Did it keep you turning the page?

What was the author good at? Dialogue? Description? Characterization? Plotting? Inciting emotion in you?

What emotions did you feel while reading the book? Excitement? Dread? Happiness? Suspense? Nostalgia? Fear & Loathing? (whether in Las Vegas or not.) bored4

What were some quotes or excerpts from the book you enjoyed most? Quote them in your review.

Did the ending satisfy you? Why? (again, don’t give anything away, just comment in general terms, ala, The ending made perfect sense, but was totally unexpected. I closed the book feeling very satisfied.)

It’s perfectly fine to also mention what didn’t work for you in the book, and why, but not merely as an excuse to bash the author. If the book was too violent for your taste, you may say so, either directly, or with a warning to readers (Warning: this book does include some disturbing scenes of violence or Caution: This book has sexual content, though tastefully done). If the book you are reviewing deals with a difficult subject you don’t enjoy or tolerate,, say that too (without spoilers).

But remember that we writers can’t please everyone, we can only write the stories we feel compelled to write, and hope there are those who are interested in reading them. And more importantly, writing well is hard work; we pour ourselves into the job, and we have feelings, just like you do.
bardsmiley

10 people like this post.

Glaring Errors

 

bloodyhandscratch_cropThis is a wide subject area, but I want to focus on just a few things.

As a segue, I have to share this post I came across. I was on a forum where people were posting for help about making money blogging. One poster was frustrated and confused and posted this:

“Been using these for over a year and made 2 penies.  How do I earn money on goggle.  It is simply frostrating.  I posted so many adds  on my blog but I have earned no money. what is happening? I have been trying to write all the rite types of subjects,and no one buys. the codes is on the page but the adds are never seen I geuss.what am I doing wrong.what do I need to do.”

 

whack{you need to give up, right now, before anyone else gets hurt. The Grammar Nazis are watching….}

Now, no one had the heart to tell this guy the truth. I almost did, but realized it would just make me seem like a pompous ass. It probably wouldn’t have helped anyway. Anyone who writes a short post and has, at my first count, 13 obvious errors, not to mention the errors in INTELLECT, can never expect to make money as a writer.

It baffles me how so many people think that writing is a cush job. It’s hard work just like any other profession. But if you can’t spell, can’t construct proper sentences, and generally present yourself as a moron (because, of course, you ARE a moron), you will have no luck. You have to possess a command of language in a broad sense, and an understanding of human nature–what’s interesting and what is not–and your ideas about plot points and events in general have to be unique or at least rendered in an interesting or entertaining way. There are plenty of talented writers out there, and THOSE are the ones you will really be competing with, not the frostrated [sic] imbecile quoted above…

Still, it bears mentioning that presentation is just as important as content, because if your presentation sucks, no one will read your content.

Notwithstanding the Village Idiots out there, in a manuscript, Glaring Errors can pop up frequently, just by virtue of the length of the work. That’s why you have to be doubly careful to check and recheck your writing. (And as I typed that, I was terrified that perhaps I had used too many commas in that sentence…there’s a down eatingcrowside to criticizing someone else’s writing, when you’re WRITING your criticism. It pays to invest in a good helmet, quality running shoes, and to develop a taste for crow).

One example of this need for vigilance, is when a character or element or object is mentioned, described, given a bit of backstory, and then halfway through the book, this character/element/object disappears, and it has nothing to do with the plot (for instance, there are no magicians or wizards populating your pages). This usually happens when the natural evolution of the plot might cause this thing to vanish unintentionally. If you’re an organic writer like me, the story will take you places you didn’t plan, and sometimes certain people, places, or things will become unimportant. Always go back to the beginning and read over it, with an eye toward catching those absconding Nounages…(yes, go ahead and notify the nearest Grammar Nazi. I made that up, and am prepared to take my demerits).greyhound

I had a character in one of my novels (Achilles Forjan) who owned a dog she was very fond of. The animal was with her frequently. Then, as the story morphed and took on a life of its own, I noticed that the dog had evaporated. This would qualify as a Glaring Error.

Sometimes the Glaring Error is that a character’s name or physical description changes. This is often caused by the act of changing a character’s name and then missing some instances of it. That happened to me in another novel, As You Were, – before I changed that character’s name because it was too close to another character’s name in another of my books (Armchair Detective). When I changed that main character’s name, using global Find and Replace, I forgot that there were instances of it in the possessive form (i.e., “Beth’s”) and the replace feature didn’t find it. So you have to be mindful of that, so that your reader won’t snag on it, and say who the hell is Beth?

Also remember that sometimes another character uses that character’s name, and so the instance would be “Beth,” –you have to watch for that too. And the same goes for text like, “Beth, always aware of the unusual, “  That comma keeps search from finding Beth all by itself. That’s where the variations on FIND and REPLACE in Microsoft Word can be helpful. (And if you’re a writer, you should be using MS Word. It is the most versatile MSwordFindreplaceand powerful word processing program–more on that in another article).

But to avoid a character name error like this to begin with, you should have at least a clear vital stats sheet on each of your characters to refer to while writing, although sometimes your muse won’t always allow you to do that, and that’s not necessarily a bad thing. (More on that in another article as well).  Just be mindful of this and the other glaring errors that can disrupt the clarity and quality of the writing to which you attach your name. It is often permanent, and you can’t take it back. Although, with the advent of today’s self-publishing, those errors can usually be corrected and the file re-uploaded. That’s both good and bad–that anyone can publish, not that you can correct errors. (More on that, too, in still another article.)

Be the first to like.

“…be prepared for some major shocks “

NEW REVIEW OF:

Also Known as Syzygy

Book Three in the AKA Investigations Series

AKASyzygyfrcvr_17Dec12_248Ponzi Bonnet has a perfect marriage, or so she thinks. Her husband, Garrison, is impotent, which suits Ponzi. She can’t have sex due to earlier problems and events in her life. Garrison is a psychologist, who better to understand Ponzi’s problems?

Ponzi becomes suspicious of Garrison and wonders if he’s told her the full truth about himself. She thinks he may be having an affair. Her suspicions are wrong. Garrison has a far worse agenda than a simple affair. He has to be stopped from carrying on his devious goings on at all costs.

Actress, Kenda Harper, is Ponzi’s best friend. Kenda is also smitten with her straight best friend, but she would never act on her feelings. Straight is straight and married is married after all. Kenda would do literally anything for Ponzi, even at the risk of her own life.

Struggling artist, Anna Dew, used to work for Garrison as his secretary and left suddenly. Ponzi has her suspicions that she may be the one Garrison is seeing. But Ponzi couldn’t be further from the truth.

Ponzi, Kenda and Anna eventually pit their wits together to outsmart Garrison and his sidekick. They have to prevent them from harming any more women, no matter what the consequences to themselves. They plot and plan and come up with a dangerous and intricate plan. But will it work? Will all three women survive?

This book is vastly different to the previous two in the series. But, it is every bit as exciting and as much a page turner from start to finish as it’s predecessors. I ended up staying up until well past my bedtime to finish this.

Syzygy is an alignment of three celestial objects according to Kelli Jae Baeli. Here we have three women aligned in the pursuit of justice. Hence the title of this book.

Syzygy features Ponzi, Kenda and Anna as it’s main characters. All are multidimensional and interact really well together. Some of the staff of AKA Investigations put in an appearance, along with Phoebe, Izzy and Ginger from the previous books. All characters are essential in moving the story along at a nice pace.

This book covers a lot of different topics. I don’t want to add in any spoilers, but be prepared for some major shocks along the way. The storyline is certainly not for the faint hearted. But having said that, the book is extremely well written and any storyline of an upsetting nature has been sympathetically penned.

I have the fourth book in this series, which I can’t wait to start. But I’m going to save it until next month. It will probably be a while before another AKA book is published. Well, I’m hoping there will be another in the series. Please!

 

Pasted from <http://affinityebooks.com/index.php?main_page=page&id=281&chapter=1>

 

Be the first to like.

Cows With Guns

(retro repost)

My beloved and I have made this pact, starting yesterday, that we would pick a subject and blog it separately, just to see what each of us would come up with. My suggestion yesterday was “Are writers born or made?”

Hers, for today, was “Cows with Guns.” Guess which one of us is more cerebral, and which one the goob?

She also informed me that the title is from a song called “Cows with guns.” Who knew?

I didn’t even do any research on that one except to glance over a Wikipedia page and notice it was the title of some animated film from Australia. (I always hear that song by Men at Work “I come from the land down under…can’t you hear, can’t you hear the thunder?? You better run, you better take cover….” –which is appropriate, if the thunder is a stampede of cows with guns. Taking cover WOULD be the wise course of action).

But I think I’m digressing. Or being parenthetical. Or Parenthetically digressive. I’m supposed to be writing about Cows with Guns, not Australian pop bands from the 80′s. [And by saying this, I'm dating myself. Good thing, since no one else is dating me.]

SIDEBAR: Note that the last statement was not parenthetical because the comment was in brackets. So I was being, at best, brackish.

And…..Back to Cows with Guns.

Right away, my steel-trap mind discerns a flaw in the logic. Cows have hooves. I fail to see the efficiency of firing a gun when you don’t have fingers. They would probably end up just throwing the gun at you. Which also might be hard when they couldn’t grip it, because, again, as i so astutely pointed out, they don’t have fingers. Which reminds me that Eddie Izzard said, “Guns don’t kill people. People kill people. And so do monkeys if they have guns.” {Eddie Izzard is a cross-dressing stand-up comic and actor who is British and probably doesn’t own a gun. Or a cow. But he was fantastic playing a non-crossdressing gypsy in The Riches. Minnie Driver was perfect as his wife, too. Of course the show was canceled because it was so good.}

And again….back to the Armed Cows…

Cows also have what is called dichromatic vision, which means they are more sensitive to sudden movement. This would be a bad state of affairs if they had guns. They’d be shooting at everything.

Because of this vision, cows also see well far away but not so well close up. So if there WERE Cows with Guns, (in some parallel universe for which there is no logical explanation) you’d be well-advised to stand really nearby, if you know what’s good for you.

So, in conclusion, the concept of cows with guns is UDDERLY absurd.

Be the first to like.

Somewhere Else (excerpts)

SomewhereElse2013Feb17frcvr_248 I am having so much fun writing Somewhere Else.

Here’s the blurb (so far…will probably be revised at some point…) so, a Working Blurb.

bored4Everyone needs a working blurb, after all…

A non-physical walk-in soul makes an agreement with another incarnated soul to take over her body. The Walk-in, perhaps too fearless, and too hungry for the pleasures of the flesh, discovers she has inherited the life of Daelah Murdock, a Mormon goody-two-shoes with a pathological attachment to the color pink. The surrogate soul’s life as a lesbian cop did not prepare her for this. Or did it? As a live-in caregiver for two men–one blind, the other wheelchair bound–Daelah’s life seems bland and puerile.

Except that someone is trying to kill her.

 

EXCERPTS:

 

1

The Color of Confusion

I felt like myself. But something had changed.

For the last few minutes, I had been trying to assimilate the volumes of information that had seemingly been downloaded into my brain. Everything from how to tie my shoes, to the relative merits of clean underwear.

Since kicking off the bed covers in this unfamiliar room, and finding the bathroom mirror, nothing was making sense. Stunned by the sensation that the face looking back at me in the glass was not my own, I scrambled in my mind for any explanation.

I sank down on the edge of the bed, rubbing my eyes and considering my confusion.

Maybe it was the dream. The one that had played out in my mind just before I emerged from nocturnal bliss that morning. I had to make sense of this weirdness thrust upon me by some unknown force. I didn’t think it was coming from the glowing white essence in the dream. The essence was shaped somewhat like an elongated teardrop, and had told me, telepathically, Thank you. I wasn’t sure what the gratitude was for. But it’s always nice to be thanked.

I had no way of knowing what I, myself, looked like in the dream, but sensed I was also a glowing essence. I had reached out to grasp the wrist that emerged from the shimmering entity–a human wrist, clenching my own in farewell.

When the Teardrop Essence vanished, my dreamself noticed a tattoo of a strange symbol on my inner forearm. But when I woke, the tattoo was not on my skin. So I sat up to draw the symbol on the pad of paper at the nightstand.

Now, here I was, frowning down at the paper, sensing that the symbol was important, but I wasn’t quite sure why. The shape resembled an ankh, the universal symbol of eternal life, but it was like a blending of two ankhs, one upright, the other upside down, and joined at the stems.

Sitting back down on the bed, I heard a saxophone. It was coming from somewhere in the house. This house I didn’t know a thing about, any more than I knew about this room in which I’d awakened. I recognized the sax tune as Patsy Cline’s Crazy.

Apropos, maybe. I wasn’t feeling exactly sane at the moment.

I opened the door to this unfamiliar room and stepped into the corridor. A dark wood staircase led down into a foyer. Holding onto the rail, I gingerly descended to the landing, my hand on the newel post.

The saxophone was coming from the room at the end of the corridor.

I turned right and continued down the hall to the room with open double doors. A man sat in a wheelchair in front of an easel, saxman2painting. Another man sat on the sofa with the saxophone, wearing dark glasses.

The painting man noticed me, glanced my way then glanced back, his gaze focused on me.

The saxophone man kept playing, unaware of my presence, as I stood there like a stranger in a strange land.

I turned and retraced my steps back to the bottom of the staircase. I stared into the kitchen. A long countertop in them idle, the usual appliances. But I’d never seen this kitchen before.

Feeling a caress at my shin, I looked down at the black and white cat, there. The feline peered up at me, ears perked, and I closed my eyes. This was still a dream, maybe. A dream within a dream.

Then all at once, in my mind’s eye, I saw the corridor behind me, but from the vantage point low to the floor. My view was traveling, like some camera was attached to…to the cat? The mind-camera paused at the doorway, an upward view of the man in the wheelchair, painting. The man glanced at the camera lens that had become my eyes.

The painting-man paused with vermilion loaded up on his brush, about to make a bold swath across the canvas, when he noticed something down the corridor. Like he was looking at me; or where my body was, in the entry to the kitchen.

Placing the laden brush in his teeth, he reached down and readjusted the position of his wheelchair so he could see me better.

The painter frowned, a drop of vermilion free falling from the end of his brush onto a dried spot of cobalt blue on his sweats.

A tapping grew louder and he twisted toward the corridor leading out of the living room as the saxophone man stood and made his way toward the painter, seated at his easel. The saxophone man moved the white-tipped cane back and forth in front of him. Tap. Tap. Tap, Tap.

I could still see this from the viewpoint of the cat.

The painter took the brush from his mouth and caught his attention with, “Psst!”

The sax-man paused, one hand on the horn dangling from a cord around his pale neck, the other on the cane. His lifting of eyebrows at the sound made his wraparound sunglasses bob upward on his nose. “What?” he whispered back.

Keeping his voice in a whisper, still, the painter said, “Have you noticed anything strange about Daelah today?”

“How would I notice anything about Daelah?” The blind man smirked.

The painter swiped a hand down his face. “You know what I mean.”

“Well, yes…” the sax-man took a few steps forward, sliding the tip of the cane along the wood floor in front of him. “She smells different.”

“Smells different?”

“Yeah.”

“New perfume?”

“Nope. Individual, natural scent is different.”

“Okay, weirdness.” Painter-man turned back to watch me, where my body was, anyway, at the end of the corridor, where I stood with my eyes closed, still. I was aware of this body enough to enjoy the visceral feel of it. I stretched, and moaned, enjoying the sensations, as if I’d gained a different encasement of human flesh that was not my own. As if I’d been without a human encasement until now.

My mind’s eye vision was still with the cat, and I saw the sax-man cock his head toward my sounds. “What the hell is she doing? Playing with herself?”

“Just stretching… like she’s never stretched before. She seems to be enjoying it too much but weird, like a cat..”

If you only knew, I thought

Sax-man took measured steps forward, made a left face, and then moved quietly down the hall, holding his cane against his chest. He paused not three feet behind me.

I knew I was still standing at the end of the long corridor leading to the kitchen, near the foot of the stairs, but my eyes were in some way still attached to the cat’s eyes.

I opened the eyes on my body, and saw the kitchen again. I looked up at the ceiling, and down at my hands, and touched my own face.

A rude honk from the sax startled me, had me stumbling against the wall. I turned to stare at him. This time, with the eyes attached to my body.

Feigning ignorance, he said, “Oh, is someone there?” He lifted his cane and swept it side to side, comically searching for me.

In the living room threshold, painter-man let out a humorous huff. “You scared me,” I said.

“Oh. Sorry.” He lowered the cane.

“How can you sneak up like that when–”

I meant to add, when you’re blind.

“I have sonar like a dolphin,” he said. “I can sense the walls and obstacles…I can feel the ions in the air, parting for my passage.”

“Right,” came the snide remark a short distance behind him.

I leaned out to see past sax-man toward the approaching wheelchaired painter rolling down the hall toward us.

Sax-man cocked his head. “Are you okay, Daelah? You smell funny.”

“What?” I said.

“Huh?” he responded, seeming just as confused about my misunderstanding as I was about his statement. I knew he had a keen sense of smell. I knew he noticed the minutiae most people missed. The subject had come up many times before, hadn’t it?

Frowning again, the man in the wheelchair stopped beside the blind man. Sax-man released his hold on the saxophone to sweep his hand at waist level, toward the disabled painter, catching him in the face. “Oh, there you are,” the blind man said.

“Stop it!” wheelchair-man reprimanded him, slapping his hand away.

Addressing the still-baffled me, Wheelchair said, “You seem weird today, Daelah.”

“I do?”

“Yes.”

“I…” Peering to my right, up the staircase, I finished, “I think I’ll go up and lie down for awhile.”

I turned and climbed the steps, making a cursory sweep of attention toward the photos on the stairway wall, and glancing back at the two men as if they were friendly house-spiders, but spiders, just the same.

I spent an hour or so roaming around the bedroom, seeking clues to my befuddlement. The most obvious thing to grab my pinkroomattention was the décor. If you could call this gaudy display décor. The bedspread was an aggravating shade of pink, and there was a pink dust ruffle made of lace around the bed. I hated it. Likewise, the matching horridly pink lampshade on the nightstand, had engendered more repulsion. Though the walls were a standard eggshell color, they were festooned with all things pink.

This could not possibly be my own room, though I had awakened here. Peering down at myself, I noticed I was wearing a hideous pink nightgown with lace around the collar. I pulled it off like it was on fire, and hurried to the closet.

Inside the wardrobe nook, my efforts to find more agreeable attire had met with a nightmarish array of pink, salmon, lavender, and fuchsia. The singular exception was a black T-shirt, banished to the far end of the clothes rod. I turned it toward me to look at it. A depiction of a bread-like ring bejeweled with fruit and nuts graced the front, and below it in white letters was the word Fruitcake. No doubt this was a gift from someone with a sense of humor who was making a veiled suggestion about the pink-woman’s mental status.

The Pink Woman. I had framed it as though the pink woman was not me. But it wasn’t me. Yet here I was, being me. Or her.

As I pulled the black fruitcake T-shirt over my head, snatched a pair of jeans and pulled them on, and added some atrocious pink sneakers to my–no surprise–pink socks, I felt a little more like myself. Whoever that was.

Emerging from the closet, I stood in the middle of the room and thought about it all. I wasn’t myself. Couldn’t be. What did that mean?

2

Teardrop Essence & The Pink Woman

My trip downstairs did not garner much information. The house was like a familiar place from long ago, yet almost erased from my memory.

The tall, angular blind man holding the saxophone, with his aquiline nose, and almost-flawless skin, pallid from a lack

wheelchairpainting

of sunshine. And the crippled painter. He seemed familiar, but not…really. But I lived here in their house. Or they, in mine. That much was clear, if only by the reaction of these two housemates. They seemed familiar, but I didn’t know them, as odd as that contradiction was. I had known better than to say, who are you? I was aware of several things I suspected I shouldn’t know at this point, but precisely who these two men were, I wasn’t sure about.

And what was up with that cat’s-eye-view downstairs? My vision had been moving around with the cat…as if my eyes were attached to the cat’s head. I was the cat’s eyes. I could hear what the cat heard, too. I was in the cat? How is that possible?

I saw the wretched pink purse on the dresser, and pulled out the aggravating pink wallet. The driver’s license read,

 

Daelah Murdock

72 North Tapioca

Cedar City, Utah.

 Tapioca? Who the hell would live on a street called Tapioca? Was Pudding Circle all full-up?

I perused the license again. The photo looked like my reflection in the mirror from earlier. I was apparently female, and 36 years old.

Digging through the pukey pink purse, I found a side pocket, and in it, a folded bulletin from the Church of Latter Day Sa

ints. What was that, Saints who weren’t quite here, but would be, tomorrow? The newsletter had a mailing label addressed to me, or the Daelah-pink-person, anyway, which meant I might actually be a card-carrying member of the Polygamy Pack.

Suddenly, I wondered if the two men downstairs were my husbands. Although why I would have chosen a blind man and a cripple for my spouses, was unclear. No. wait…it didn’t work that way…it was the men who got to have numerous wives…th

at’s certainly not fair. Unless this was another planet or an alternate reality where there was a matriarchy in place. That would be cool.

Glancing around at my obvious pink fetish, the answer to that was a little easier to guess. I had a screw loose, and they were the only two Mormon men left who would have my stupid pink ass. Except I couldn’t suffer from a blow to my self-esteem, since this was about that Daelah-person. Not me. Except, once again, here I was, being her.

Also in the handbag was a tube of lipstick the color of–again, no surprise–Passion Pink. I thought I would vomit if I had to look at all this pink much longer. My gut was already queasy.

Moving into the bathroom, I checked my reflection once more, just to be sure, and then opened the medicine cabinet, fully expecting it to be lined with bottles of Pepto Bismol, if only by the fetish of its color. There was only one bottle of the stuff, yet I was not encouraged by that paltry representation. I grabbed it, screwed off the lid and took a slug of it. I was drinking something pink to quell the queasiness brought on by so many pink things. Oh, the irony.

When I put it back, I saw a prescription. Alprazolam. A generic form of Xanax. This told me that Daelah Murdock had some sort of anxiety disorder, though the only anxiety I felt now stemmed from my confused, Swiss-cheese memory and the proliferation of pink in this infernal bedroom. A plastic bottle of Tums resided next to the Pepto, its contents graced by periodic pink tablets as well. What was up with this woman? Why was she so obsessed with pink? This woman. Me. Not me. Hell’s bells.

Closing the cabinet, I noticed in the mirror, for the first time, my hair. I looked like the Flying Freaking Nun, my crowning glory more a hat than a head of hair, if the amount of hairspray was any indication. I opened several drawers until I found a hairbrush, and stroked it through the glue-like texture on each side, yelping when the bristles hit a sore spot.

Reaching up, I felt a huge lump at the back of my skull. Ahhh…that explains it. I’d bumped my head.

A frisson of panic burned its way through my chest and up into my brain. What if the Teardrop Essence dream and the downloaded brain matter was the result of a head injury? What if I had forgotten everything about myself and it never reappeared in my consciousness? Maybe not such a bad thing, I reassured myself, considering what I had discovered so far.

My attention snapped back to my reflection, and in lieu of an answer to the head injury question, I resolved to let my hair grow out, and get some real body in it, to avoid the churchy look.

I was so hungry. And, oddly, horny. I’d have to address those concerns soon, but for now, I had to figure out what the hell was going on.

I felt I was being watched. Looking up, I saw the cat. It was standing in the doorway, watching me. I wondered if maybe I could Blackandwhitecatpinkcollarsend it downstairs for a little eavesdropping again. “Here, kitty kitty,” I said. I was t

hinking about my earlier discovery where my mind attached itself to the cat.

It loped over and jumped on the bed, agreeably. Now, I noticed the infernal pink collar it was wearing. I reached for the buckle, and saw the nameplate on the leather. Polly. Probably short for polygamy, if past experience with Daelah was any indication.

“Hello, Polly. I’m about to do you a favor, and then I want you to do me one, deal?” I removed the collar and rubbed her now-unadorned neck. She purred and dropped down to writhe on the bed next to me.

I closed my eyes and focused on the cat’s head and thought go downstairs and listen

to those two men…I waited in the darkness behind my eyelids until an image popped into my mind again. A video image. Who knew that traversing the stairs tilted forward and low to the ground, would look so scary? But it was working. I rode along with Polly as she padded into the livingroom and jumped up on a chair. I even saw the paw come toward my face and a pink (ick…grrr) tongue licking it. Then I focused on listening through the cat.

 and Later…..

 

5

Operation Slake

Cornelius rolled into the kitchen and I heard him coming, so I had to begin implementing the only plan I had so far. Feeding my carnal needs. Operation: Slake. I graced him with a view of Daelah’s backside, now my backside, as I bent down with my head in the refrigerator.

“Thank God,” he said.

I raised up to regard him, but said nothing.

“What’s for dinner?” he asked.

“I give up, what?”

“You’re not going to cook?”

“Why would I do that?”

“It’s your job, that’s why.”

“It may have been the other Daelah’s job, but it’s not mine.” I turned back to the ‘fridge, even gave my ass a little wiggle, just to see what effect it would have.

He didn’t seem to be baiting properly.

“What do you mean, the other Daelah?”

I stood to face him; let my tongue brush over the front of my teeth. I decided they were free of food bits, which was important, when you were trying to dazzle a man with your smile. Men like it when you do things that make them look at your mouth. Because all they can think of in regard to mouths, is how perfectly they fit around a dick. I’m not sure where I got that information, but it seemed plausible.

As I let my tongue play a little on my teeth, I decided they felt clean enough, but I’d have to get something other than that red Close-Up. It was way too close to pink. Especially when spit and water was added.

Corn-Cripple bumped the ‘fridge door with his chair. “What do you mean, the other Daelah?”

Persistent little bugger. I was going to have to tell him. If for no other reason than it was distracting him from my seduction efforts. I needed to get laid, and soon. I closed the door and looked down at him. Not a bad looking guy really. He could have used a haircut, though. “You’re gonna think I’m crazy if I tell you what I mean.”

“I already think you’re crazy. I think your brain got scrambled when you fell down the stairs.”

Mmm. Interesting. “When did I fall down the stairs?”

“Two days ago.”

I had no memory of that, so I said, “I have no memory of that.”

“My point exactly.”

“So, I didn’t get my head injury in the accident you two had?”

He frowned harder. “No…we met in the hospital, after that.”

“Look. What’s your name again?” I knew his name, but I was playing aloof, because men liked the women they couldn’t have.

“Cornelius.”

“Cool. Cornelius.” I opened a cabinet and pulled out a bag of chips, opening it and plunging my hand in. “Something happened to me, and I’m not quite sure what, yet, but whoever Daelah was two days ago, she’s not here anymore. I’m here.” I used a chip as a gesturing device as I spoke. It worked quite well, but I wanted it in my mouth, so I crunched into it. “And frankly, if I had run into her, I would have squished her like a bug.” I poked another chip in and smacked my lips rudely. Mmm. I looked at the bag. Mesquite Barbeque. Delicious.

Corn-boy rolled back in his chair a few inches. “You realize that what you just said sounds insane.”

mequitebbqchipsI crammed in more chips. “Of course it does,” I said around the chips, accidentally blowing a few crumbs into the air; one of which landed on his cheek. He barely flinched. “Nonetheless, it’s true. I woke from a weird dream this morning, and I have no memory of this chick–” I indicated myself, so he’d know I was talking about this body, but not necessarily me. “All I can figure is that I’ve somehow taken control of her body and she’s…gone. Which means I can do whatever I want with this body…” I gave him a wry lift of an eyebrow, hoping he’d catch on.

He stared at me, unblinking. Maybe he was thinking about the surrogate soul concept, maybe he was just thinking about my mouth on him, finally.

I prodded, “Get it?”

“Got it.”

“Good.” I set the chips down, opened the ‘fridge again, pulled out a plastic container, and lifted the lid, sniffing its contents. With a grimace, I put it back. It didn’t smell like food. More like a dirty sock. I suppose I would be charged with grocery shopping in this little arrangement.

When I turned back to him, he was rolling down the hall toward the living room. And me, standing there all bent over and inviting. Damn.

I knew that Corn-on-wheels would probably be updating Horn-boy, so I looked at Polly, who was sitting on the floor staring at me, attached to her and sent her into the livingroom.

Be the first to like.

Curse of Cache La Poudre (novella)

My new novella.

CCLPfrcvr_248Danica and Rikki have missed their plane, which couldn’t be worse news because now they might just miss their own wedding. When a pilot of a small plane offers to fly them there himself, they jump at the chance; after all, the man swears he has one short stop to deliver supplies to a ranger station in Cache la Poudre, then it’s clear skies all the way.

The only trouble is, the stop along the way turns into a destination all of its own, when the pilot, telling the women they’re his cargo, delivers them into the hands of an armed man. They’re needed for a babysitting job, whatever that means, but job or not, being kidnapped is not on Danica and Rikki’s itinerary. They have a wedding to get to, and a honeymoon, and being chased through the wilderness, while a great bonding exercise, is not the romantic getaway they were expecting.

Then there’s the ‘babysitting’. Even if they get away from the kidnappers, dare they leave without checking first that there’s not a baby there somewhere?

 

(Click cover to download on Smashwords)

on Amazon Kindle:
http://tinyurl.com/amf572e

 

Be the first to like.

Reading, Muses, Curses & the Pick-A-Project-Polka.

 

Since completing the third and fourth books (simultaneously) of the AKA Investigations series, I am doing that Writers-blockPick-A-Project-Polka; a dance we writers do when we’re trying to decide what we feel like working on next; we listen to our muse, we dance with our muse, we kick our muse out and get practical, and we sometimes curse our muse and send it to bed without dinner. All of these I’ve done this time around, as well.

Fortunately, I seem to have spent enough time on a particular draft to safely assume it’s the one I will be finishing next. I have always had a collection of half-written books that one day I intend to finish (Quintessence, Somewhere Else, and Another Justice, to name a few). Most writers can probably say that. But the interesting thing is being faced with tangible examples of how far you’ve come as a writer. Stories I recalled as really good, needing to be finished because of their value, I now look at, and consider them lining for a birdcage.

Take the one I’m rewriting, now….it started out years ago as The Curse of Madagascar. Then the TV series, Lost, began to air and I was afraid I’d be accused of plagiarism to some degree, if I tried to publish that story, even though I had written it years before the TV series came about.  The book was about a straight couple, newlyweds, who are on their way to Saint-Denis, in Africa for their honeymoon, and instead get stranded on a tropical island (Madagascar, though they don’t know where they are) after their transport boat sinks. They battle a shark, then get on shore with nothing, and struggle to survive in an environment that is filled with strange creatures, is unfriendly and mysterious, and soon discover there is something sinister going on, and their lives are in danger, because there are some villainous men who are using the island for….er…um…

Here is where the story fizzled (Honestly, it fizzled from the get-go, but for the sake of explanation–) I needed to pinpoint what the “curse” in the title referred to….

Originally, it was in third person omniscient, then I changed it to third person limited. Originally, it was also set in Africa, but then I decided I didn’t want to spend the research time necessary to write anything about a setting I knew little about, and opted instead to change the setting to Cache La Poudre, a wilderness area in Northern Colorado. I am familiar with my home state. Also, at different times it was about drugs, human trafficking, and I even considered something supernatural, likecatfacekeyboard the island was a living entity somehow, and perhaps it was a sort of purgatory, and my characters were already dead, but in some alternate reality after death (See? Very similar to Lost). It hardly mattered what my story was about, though, because the whole shebang was a cheese-fest. Dialogue smarmy and uber-romanticized, like something out of a bad Harlequin (not to suggest there was ever a GOOD Harlequin). But I noticed all the stereotyping I was doing, with gender-roles. I, of course, had to have the man save the woman, and she was, of course, weak and frightened and only able to feel safe while in his arms. Repugnant, all around.

[finger in my throat, and a retching noise].

So then, in the spirit of focusing my writing endeavors on the one genre (lesbian), and more importantly, in the spirit of putting my name only on stories I’m not ashamed of, I decided to rewrite what I already had on this story and finish it.

One rewrite focus area, as mentioned, was the dialogue–cheese-be-gone….another was the sentence structure. Too same-same, too often. Then I ran into that whole stylistic quagmire of having two females in almost every repeatkeyscene and getting tired of using “she” and “her” so having to fix that with sentence structure, and stylistic tricks. Another was beginning paragraphs and sentences with the same word repeatedly, over and over, again and again, until it became a repetitious, recapitulation, reiteration, replay, reproduction, rerun, reshowing and also a duplication.  Amazing, the little lessons we learn about our craft that we hardly notice until being faced with them in the form of our own literary apparitions, ghost stories from the past. My muse was quite wispy and frail back then. Largely attributable to my early years of reading too many of the aforementioned romance novels, and also watching too many soap operas. I learned how to write poorly from both (these sorts of things also have a way of retarding your intellect, as well). My writing only improved when I began to read more accomplished, masterful authors. Like Edgar Allen Poe, Edgar Rice Burroughs, Robert A. Heinlein and later, Dean Koontz (in whom I have lost interest in recent years, perhaps because his writing has become a little tedious–though I did learn a great deal by studying his writing, to find out what he was doing to get me to turn that page every time).

In fact, most of my reading experiences have been about finding a set of authors I could follow; but they were few and far between, and so I read widely in many genres, and ultimately discarded most of them after reading only one of their books.  It takes quite a lot to get me to turn a page, and if it’s not a strong enough pull, I will lay that book down and move on. I’ve always felt that there were not enough years in my life to read everything I want to read, so I am loath to read anything that isn’t a valuable use of my time. I can see how all of these experiences have shaped me as a writer.

I’ve always enjoyed the Maximum Ride series by James Patterson, even though I don’t usually read in the Youngplumisland_DeMille Adult genre. I found those books hugely entertaining and delightful and quick-reading, which was what I wanted at the time. And more recently, I enjoyed Gone Girl, by Gillian Flynn, but was disappointed in the cop-out ending–a particularly potent peeve of mine. And I have only a few days ago, discovered Nelson DeMille, and he’s shaping up to be a favorite, if this book, Plum Island, continues to be as good as it has been from page-one. I’m excited about this possibility, since I see the stacks and stacks of books he has just waiting for my hungry eyes to explore.

Over the last ten years or so, I’ve read far more nonfiction than fiction. I read many books by authors like Christopher Hitchens, Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins, Carl Sagan, George Smith, Stephen Hawking, and other authors in the science and atheism category, as well as a plethora of social psychology. It seemed to influence me to write nonfiction, which is why I strayed from the market and over-diversified myself into lower royalties.

But I was in a self-imposed curriculum, my own university, and the studies I did in religion, alone, would have garnered me a degree, if I had been doing it in an actual collegiate setting–perhaps a master’s thesis equivalent, in the three years it took me to write my 6-volume magnum opus, Supernatural Hypocrisy: The Cognitive Dissonance of a God Cosmology.  Additionally, I published a book of poetry (Yin & Yang: Poetry from Both Sides of my Disposition), a memoir (Falling through the Cracks: This Misadventures of No One Famous) compiled all my essays into volumes, (Like Too Much World, and Wear a Helmet, and Bettered by a Dead Crustacean) and even a volume of essays about writing in Don’t Fall in Love With Your Words (Fall in Love With Your Craft). I wrote a few nonfiction books for lesbians,  like ISO (In Search Of): The Art of Dating, Relationships & Sex for the Discerning Lesbian and Sullied Pajamas: A Discerning Lesbian on Dating, Relationships & Sex.

Throughout all this abandonment to the whims of my muse, I learned a great deal about the craft of writing and of the discipline of publishing and editing, but I was not being wise about the market. I said I didn’t care about that, I made enough money writing what I wanted to write, with no regard for what was popular. But then the royalties crashed when the ebook market opened up and my print books stopped selling while my electronic versions increased instead; but I was now competing with a whole horde of Indie authors, the successful ones of whom were writing series fiction and sticking to one genre. I had, as I said, diversified myself right out of a paycheck. And I was getting really fond of that extra money. Hopefully my rededication to one genre, and focus on series, will get me back on track.

Sales are surprisingly good for my two new ones Also Known as Syzygy and Also Known as Rising and Falling, which are numbers 3 and 4 on the AKA Investigations series. This tells me that there were readers out there justfingerscrossedkeyboard_324 waiting for me to continue that series. And I will continue to do that, while developing other series in the subgenres of lesbian fiction, and making most of them novellas since the trend seems to be shorter books, now. I guess people don’t have or make much time to read these days. Until then, I must keep my focus, and not stray into territory that I can’t occupy in a formidable way, and hope to gain an appreciable piece of the literary pie in that fashion.

Fingers crossed, when not typing.

 

Be the first to like.

Lunacy Factor: Make My Day (Excerpt)

excerpt from

Also Known As Rising & Falling

AKAR&Ffrcvr_138

( AKA Investigations Series, Book 4)

Ginger had stepped outside to make sure that Payne Hollister left the premises. She wished she could have arrested him, but the crime

had been so long ago, and there was no case to prosecute. Date rape, sadly, was a commonplace occurrence, and more often than not, left unreported.

Checking on Phoebe again before she had to leave for her late-shift, Ginger went down to the apartment to change, Izzy joining her.

Officer Appreciation Day was not what it sounded like. No parades, no award ceremonies. Just Detectives in the department taking shifts like a beat cop. Captain Campbell thought this was a good way to remind the plainclothes cops of what it was like to be a regular cop in uniform. It seemed to increase the working relationships at the station, but it was still not something Ginger Grant looked forward to.

“I can’t believe that dick showed up tonight.”

“I know.”

Izzy pulled out the coffee carafe, and paused to look at Ginger. “What are you doing?”

Ginger had been standing, immobile, by the door. “I’m trying to remember where I put my keys.”

“They’re not in the basket?”

“No.”

Izzy poured coffee in the waiting cup Ginger had provided. “Not in your pocket?”

“No, I’ve already looked in all the obvious places.” She came back into the room and scanned it, as if hoping the keys would jump up in the air so she could catch them.

“Don’t worry. Maybe you’re just getting senile.”

Ginger turned slowly, one eyebrow cocked, and probably loaded. “That might be humorous coming from someone my own age, but from you, it’s just a sharp stick.”

“Don’t hate me for being younger,” she said, putting the lid on the tumbler and handing it to Ginger.

In the living room area, Ginger began accosting the sofa cushions. “Most people are visual. And those images attach to something. With me, it just goes in, floats around, then when a stiff wind comes along, whooooosh–it’s gone.”

“Well, maybe you should plug the leaks. Wear earplugs…I mean, that’s a 99 cent fixer-upper.” She chuckled. “Or you could just put two marbles in your ears.”

“Oh I can’t do that, they’ll fall in and then that noise of them rolling around would keep me up at night.”

“You’re up at night anyway. You’re like a vampire.’

“A non-visual, marble-headed vampire.”

Izzy righted the askew cushion and plopped onto the sofa. “I’m sure some bleeding heart liberal group will take you on, don’t worry about it.”

“Ah!” The keys had fallen off the by the door hook and landed in one of Izzy’s shoes. “I’m late. I’ll call you later.” She scooted over and kissed the top of Izzy’s head.

As Ginger left through the rear exit stairs, and pulled out of the drive, she wondered if her decision to skip the afternoon nap and her delay was really self-sabotage. Like a petulant school girl, she didn’t want to go to work tonight. It was Officer Awareness Day. She was aware of being an officer, and didn’t need to be reminded, thank you very much. But Captain Campbell’s pet project demanded detectives spend one day of the month patrolling, like they did when they were beat cops. No matter what, this day was always bizarre. For some reason, it was like the universe knew she was out of her comfort zone, and it wanted to make the most of the torture session.

Today, Ginger was to join Sergeant Chloe Eckert on patrol in a neighborhood that was largely a retirement village. She could only imagine the heyday the universe was going to have with that one. Senile old people. There but for the grace of whomever, go I, she thought. The prophesy awaited fulfillment.

At the Windsor Meadows Security Office parking lot, Ginger locked up the Cherryot and slid into Sergeant Eckert’s black and white. She was greeted with a box of Krispy Kreme donuts. “Oh, you shouldn’t have.”

“Blatant attempt at being your toady.” She buckled her seat belt.

Ginger sunk her teeth into the doughnut and made a sound not unlike sexual pleasure. “What is it you think I can do for you?”

“You can’t say things like that while making those sounds. It could be construed as sexual harassment.”

“So arrest me. You’re the one who brought the evil donuts.”

Chloe smiled, shook back her colorful hair; brown, with blonde and red highlights. It had been the first thing Ginger noticed about ChloeEckertthe officer when they met a few months ago on a domestic violence call. Her hair. She was pretty sure Chloe was gay, too, but didn’t feel it was appropriate to bring it up. Ginger would certainly have asked her out, if there was no Izzy in the picture. But she had no complaints in that department. “Still. Not sure why you’d toady me. I’m just a detective.”

“Just a detective?” Chloe almost squeaked. “You’re like a fucking rock star, and I’m like your groupie.”

Ginger lowered a brow at her. “Seriously?”

“I’m not the only one, either. I don’t think you realize how much some of the female cops admire you. You’re inspiring to us. And…” She pushed the visor back in place, clipped a pen in the elastic. “I just took the detective’s exam.”

“Really? Good for you, Chloe. We need more female D’s. I’m sure you’ll pass with high marks. But tonight, I’m on your turf. I’m just a beat cop like you. So, you’re in charge. What do beat cops do these days?”

Chloe pointed to the last bite of glazed doughnut in Ginger’s hand. “You’re off to a damn good start.” She punched up the GPS on the unit laptop. “Have you ever worked this area?”

“Nope. Anything I should know up front? Give me the four-one-one on Windsor Meadows.”

Chloe put the cruiser in gear and pulled out onto the main street. “It’s a fucking asylum.”

“OAD shift, a full moon, and an asylum. This should be interesting.”

“It will be. You’re aware this is a retirement village. But it also seems to have an inordinate concentration of senility, mixed with some weird lunacy factor that must be emanating from the ground. Maybe they have radon gas underneath this place.”

“So, boredom, probably not a concern tonight.”

Chloe glanced at her. “Um…no.” Chloe grabbed the handset from the dash and notified dispatch. “Eckert and Grant in the saddle at Windsor Meadows.”

“Ten-four,” the dispatcher said.

Ginger pulled a second doughnut out of the box. “Can we just eat all of these now, so I can focus?”

Chloe laughed. “You have to pace yourself, Ginger-Bear.”

Their first call was to a high rise apartment building where the AARP crowd thrived. Two 70 year old women were involved in a domestic dispute, according to a giggling dispatcher.

It seemed that one woman was trying to ram the other woman with her Hoveround. The recipient of this scooter-attack had called Denver PD. Ginger said into her shoulder-mic, derisively, “Really.”

“Yes. REALLY. I promise,” the dispatcher giggled.

“It has begun,” Chloe said solemnly. “This is the same address I was called to last month, only that time, Miss Rita-of-the-Hoveround had blown herself up when she smoked too close to her oxygen tank. There was a small fire on the carpet that looked like the long fuse of a detonation device, and Miss Rita was found on the floor with burns on her right arm.”

“Lovely.”

“And, while I was trying to interview her around the ministrations of the paramedic, she oldladyscooter1had the cheek to ask for a cigarette. Apparently, she needed one because blowing herself up had caused her some stress.”

Ginger laughed under her breath. “Jesus.”

At this current call, Ginger and Chloe took the key to the scooter until Miss Rita calmed down, and then went on their way. Ginger jotted notes for the report.

No sooner had the two paid for their first cup of coffee at the local Starbucks, than another call came through about an accident at a private garage only a few blocks away. The old woman had hit the garage door remote button twice accidentally, so it closed and she didn’t realize, and backed right through it. “My foot slipped off the brake,” the woman said defensively.

“So you hit the gas?” Ginger asked her.

Chloe just smiled knowingly though the whole thing, and offered, as they walked back to the cruiser, “It’s day-backward and I have too much hands on my time.”

Ginger left the scene with a caveat emptor: senior citizens should never be allowed to operate motorized vehicles.

At the next call, they were summoned to another high rise apartment building a few miles away. An old man had dropped his cell phone down the elevator shaft. This particular elevator was notorious for stopping between floors, and that’s how it was when they found it. Chloe said she’d have to jump down under it to get the phone. Good thing it was on the first floor, so that the only way it could go when someone pushed the button, was up. She considered just calling the fire department, but the old geezer was beside himself, since his phone was his lifeline–by the looks of him, a lifeline he sorely needed. The man said, “I’ll hold the door for you.”

Chloe said, “No, Officer Grant will take care of it, because you’ll get distracted and wander off and I’ll be trapped under the elevator and get squished.”

Ginger held the doors open with her own body, as Chloe made quick work of hopping down and grabbing the phone, and climbing back out. When she handed the old guy his cell, he said, “What are you doing with my phone?”

Rolling her eyes, Chloe just bid him a good day and Ginger followed her back out to the car to write it up. The full moon was doing its job. The lunacy factor was alive and well.

They cruised by the other cop on that beat, waved to him cordially. It was a rookie named Josh, who rode with Chloe on one of these Awareness patrols, while he was still in training. He used to be an Army scout; those are the guys who trudge along in front of everyone else and watch for danger. They’re, unfortunately, the first to take a bullet or trip a wire. Chloe soon learned why he was an Army scout. His platoon-mates wanted him dead.

chupacabra“I got his number a few months ago,” Chloe told Ginger. “when he drew down one night on a plastic coyote that the residents had placed outside to scare the geese away.” She took the roundabout back into Windsor. “Somehow, he saw the thing and was startled, so dropped to the ground with his gun out. The coyote wasn’t moving, so he crawled over and poked it with his gun. He told me later he thought it was a chupacabra.”

You’re making this up,” Ginger laughed.

“If I’m lyin’ I’m dyin’. I asked him another night where his weapon was, and he found it slid around to his back, because he wasn’t wearing keeper tabs on his belt, and had pulled his coat over his weapon, too, leaving the access zipper closed. That boy was one shift shy of having his own placard on the Line of Duty death wall.”

As Chloe guided the unit through the serene streets of Windsor Meadows, they passed a man with a pot belly, who looked oddly like he was with-child. “That’s Pregnant Don, on his way to the community center.” She honked and waved at him as she went by.

As darkness shrouded the streets, the winter chill swelling the air, Ginger turned the heater up.

Chloe gave her a look.

“What? My arms are cold.”

“Not on the inside.”

Ginger rolled her eyes. “That’s like: ‘it’s hot today’ — ‘not in Canada’. Kinda not the point.”

Chloe laughed, as a new call came through. There were people moving around in an old woman’s attic. Chloe lifted a knowing eyebrow at Ginger.

When they investigated, they discovered there were no people in the attic, and indeed, no attic. Chloe told the woman she had scared them away and they wouldn’t be bothering her anymore, and hoped she remembered to take her medication. This was the same woman that used to keep her important papers hidden in the oven, but got hungry and preheated it, causing a fire that burned all those papers up. Chloe said that once, the same woman reported that “hoodlums” were rattling the doors as they went down the hall of the floor she lived on. The lady called dispatch frequently with the same report.

Officer Eckert responded to this complaint by traversing the hall in question, rattling knobs.

Ginger laughed. “What are you doing?”

“Terrorizing a crazy lady.”

When they went in to talk to the lady, giving her the obligatory I ran-the-hoodlums-off-and-they-won’t-be-bothering-you-anymore spiel, she noticed the refrigerator in the middle of the kitchen. “Why is your ‘fridge in the middle of kitchen?” Ginger asked her.

“How else are you supposed to clean behind it?”

Heavy sighs shared. It was obvious, the fridge was kept right there in the middle of the floor and the woman just walked around it. Ginger was afraid to ask how she actually got it there.

A man named Barry had summoned them to say there was voodoo in his apartment.

“Where?” Ginger asked.

He showed her. It was in his chair, on his carpet.

It was dirt. The path through his apartment was thick with dirt. Voodoo dirt. He said the woman upstairs, a Miss Beecher, was putting voodoo on him, among other things. She assured him she would go up there and talk to her. When she knocked, the woman saw her and sighed. “What now?”

eggvibratortableGinger had trouble concentrating because Miss Beecher had one of those egg vibrators on the table next to her chair. She almost forgot why they were there. Chloe’s eyes went to the egg and back to Ginger, and the desire to laugh was almost overwhelming. Chloe did a good job of maintaining her composure, but Ginger felt a case of screaming meemies coming on.

Chloe cleared her throat. “Um…Mr. Barry says you’re putting voodoo on him, and he wants you to please stop.”

Ginger was smiling as Miss Beecher commenced with the eye-rolling.

Readjusting her duty belt, Chloe added, “He said you were after him and tried to kiss him, and so if you would just stop trying to kiss him, that would really help me out.”

The old woman giggled. “He tried to kiss ME one day and I said you do it again I’ll punch you in the mouth. Maybe that’s what is really bothering him.”

“Well, now, it’s voodoo.”

Ginger and Chloe went back down to Mr. Barry’s apartment and gave him the update. “I yelled at Miss Beecher and she’s agreed to stop the voodoo.” Chloe told him. She wasn’t lying. She really had asked her to stop.

Mr. Barry was not convinced. “You said that last time! They always say that, but it keeps happening!” He then informed Chloe that she needed to be arrested for murder because she wasn’t doing anything about it. “Nobody’s dead! How can I be arrested for murder when no one’s dead?”

There was indeed a reason why they called it lunacy. It was from the word, lunar, meaning moon. As that full shining orb hung in the night sky, their evening was further entertained by an old guy who drove his car up on the sidewalk and hit a fire hydrant. They did have to call the fire department for that one. Water was spewing everywhere. While returning to their patrol car, Ginger said, “Yah, if you can’t see, it’s best to drive really fast and buy a really big car.”

Before they’d even reached the vehicle, dispatch notified them of a suspect fleeing a suspected drug deal, and Ginger perked up. “Finally. A normal call.”

They caught sight of him running across the roundabout, fenced him in between a couple of houses, and they both just stood there watching him running around a tree, in an effort to find a way out. “If you run around a tree enough times,” Ginger intoned, “you become invisible.”

“Oh, to be 17 again,” Chloe added.

“I know, right?” Ginger reached for her cuffs in at the back of her belt and they moved toward him.

“You don’t grow brains until about 30.”

“And sometimes not even then.” Ginger circled her finger at him as a signal to turn around. He assumed the position when he realized he wasn’t going anywhere. After cuffing him, she began the pat-down. “Got anything that’s gonna poke me, stick me or piss me off?”

He did, of course, have all three.

 

 

There were downtimes, and Chloe would periodically park at certain vantage points while they waited for the next call. Chloe regaled Ginger with stories about  previous calls at Windsor Meadows, while they polished off the rest of the doughnuts.

“Now I’ll have to actually go to the gym to work these off.” Ginger closed the lid of the donut box and tossed it in the back seat.

Chloe patted her stomach. “I prefer sexercise.”

Ginger smiled. “Sounds like a better idea. Now the doughnuts don’t seem so evil anymore.”

“It’s not so bad, really. I enjoy pulling Windsor every so often. It’s a nice break from the usual fare, and always good for a laugh.”

“I’ve actually had a good time tonight,” Ginger admitted. “Probably the least dangerous patrol in Denver.”

“Yeah, they stick lots of rooks in Windsor. You can see why. It’s usually pretty innocuous here. But there are a few gangbangers over in Pine Village across the main drag. And where there’s gangs, there’s drugs. So every now and then we’ll get one of those…tree-orbitals.”

The last call was about a complaint that a Mrs. Gentry reported, saying that not only were the neighbors stealing her electricity, but now they were trying to steal her brains. In the report, Ginger added, It is this officer’s opinion that this has already occurred.

Before clocking out back at the station, Ginger would also have to stop at the security office for the village, charged with the unenviable task of looking over the reports of the other officers on that shift. She dreaded reading the Box-O-Rocks collection. That was the moniker Chloe had given to rookie Josh, because he was as dumb as a box of rocks. The boy had no acquaintance with commas and periods, and it sometimes completely changed the meaning of his reports. He couldn’t spell either. And it always took him two hours to write his reports out. Probably why he waited until the end of shift to do it. Once, Chloe had told him, “Learn to use commas and periods. Don’t worry about the semicolons and stuff, but jeez.” She made the mistake of saying, “Every time you take a breath, use a comma.” She then read through his next report and said, “Do you have COPD?”

Be the first to like.

AKA # 4: Also Known as Rising & Falling -Now Available!

AKAR&Ffrcvr_138Now available on Smashwords: Book 4 in the Aka Investigations Series,

Also Known as Rising & Falling.

(Book 3 was just made available a few days ago–read that one first! And if you haven’t read #1 and #2, read them all in order, okay? Okay)

Here’s an excerpt….(Jobeth is recovering from a fall down the stairs, caused by the slippers she was wearing)

 

~15~

Cranky-Pants & Furbabies

 

Consciousness crept in again on drug-addled feet, and Jobeth immediately saw the close-up view of slippers on her chest. The ones that caused her fall down the stairs. She looked over at a smiling Izzy standing next to the bed. “Cute. When I am able to get out of this bed, I’m going to beat you with them.”

Izzy dismissed the empty threat. “Are you awake enough to talk?”

“Until the drugs kick in again.” Jobeth reached for the prescription bottle with her left hand. “The laptop keeps waking me up. I keep putting it on sleep mode and it keeps waking up.”

“Maybe it’s not tired,” Izzy suggested, sitting down on the bed. “Do you need me to fluff your pillow?”

“It’s memory foam. It fluffs itself.”

Izzy nodded, smiling. “Okay then. Listen, I think we have a new case.”

Digging out the Darvocet with a finger, Jobeth popped it in her mouth and washed it down with the water on the nightstand. “Who?”

“Ponzi Bonnet.”

“Who?”

“That friend of Phoebe’s. She thinks her husband might be thinking about killing her. Or maybe just having an affair. Or maybe wanting to kill her because he’s having an affair…”

“I thought it was the pain meds. Her name is really Ponzi Bonnet?”

“Yep. And she’s just as weird as her name is.”

“How’s that?”

Izzy pulled a half-eaten rice cracker off the comforter and held it up. Jobeth snatched it with her left hand and popped it in her mouth, chewing. “Do go on.”

“Well, according to Ponzi herself, she’s got some issues…kind of reclusive, has a sleep disorder, and no telling what else.”

“And you don’t think that has something to do with why she thinks her husband is trying to kill her?”

“I have a sleep disorder.”

“See?”

Izzy gave her a raspberry sound. “Maybe. But I have to say, there are suspicious things happening…” Izzy went through the incidents that sent Ponzi to her conclusions. “And Phoebe says Ponzi is so worried about it, that she thought it might be better safe than sorry. She thinks I ought to tail him for a while and see what he’s up to.”

“Well, as long as we’re getting paid, I don’t care.”

“Here’s the interesting part. Ponzi is stinking rich, and her husband is a psychiatrist, and he’s the one who said she needed some help with these issues.”

Jobeth reached for the water bottle again, and washed down the cracker. The meds were giving her an awful case of cotton-mouth. “That’s a little convenient, if he really is going to kill her.”

“That’s what I thought,” Izzy said. “He could fling her off a building and then say she did it to herself, thinking she could fly.”

“Right. Actually, that would be the best way to get away with it…” She looked around for more crackers. “Maybe he’s planning the perfect crime.”

“Not perfect if we catch him at it.”

“Well, keep an eye on him for a few days and see if anything seems weird…and more importantly, bring me some rice crackers.”

“Will do.” Izzy stood up.

“Wait…” Jobeth said.

Izzy waited for a few beats. “What?”

She seemed confused. “I was going to say something…”

“And I was going to be riveted,” Izzy cracked.

Frowning, Jobeth said, “I’m the witty one. You don’t get to be witty.”

“Witty is genetic, apparently. Don’t fight it.” She started for the door again and paused, studying her sister. “It bothers you that I’m doing this stuff without you, doesn’t it?”

“You’re stealing my thunder.”

“I’m stealing a few drops of rain, that’s all. It’s not exactly exciting.”

“Part of the job. But sometimes it can get interesting.”

“Yeah, when will that happen?”

“It will happen when…something happens.”

Izzy snorted. “How much medication are you on?”

“Not enough, apparently, because it hasn’t taken away the pain of your presence.”

“Oh, all right, cranky-pants. I’ll let you go back to sleep.” Izzy paused at the door, eying the discarded footwear by the bed. “Oh, do you want me to fetch your slippers?”

“Vamoose!”

Izzy laughed and closed the door on her way out.

 

Be the first to like.

Also Known As Syzygy now available!

Syzygyfrcvr_15Dec12_248Now Available!!! Also Known as Syzygy, book 3 in the AKA Investigations series

SYNOPSIS:

On December 3, 2012, Saturn, Venus & Mercury aligned. On that same night, three women align to see that justice is done.

Ponzi Bonnet thought she had found the perfect husband. A psychologist could certainly understand her damage. But her suspicion of infidelity turns out to be something far worse. Far more sinister. And he had to be stopped.

Kenda Harper, an actress and Ponzi’s best friend, will do anything to help. Even if it means endangering her own life and denying the yearning in her heart.

Anna Dew, an artist and HSP, could not tell her friend Ponzi why she pulled away, but when she learns that her solution only enables bad men to do bad things, she is compelled to make it right.

Three women, finding strength amid their weaknesses, embarking on a journey into darkness, and the labyrinths of selfhood, match wits with the men who would inflict harm on other women, and they won’t give up until justice is done.

smashwordslogoamazonprintKindlelogo

 ACDFrCvr23May11_138x210

ALSO–The first book in this series (Armchair Detective) is FREE on Smashwords for a limited time.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Be the first to like.

Distracting Fiction: Brand vs. Generic

Recently, a reader mentioned my use of specific products in my books, and called it “distracting.”

brand_productsFirst of all, this reader I mentioned is from New Zealand, and I write toward an American audience. These product names and brands I might use are all familiar to American readers, and so it does create a clearer picture for them than it would a reader who might not even recognize what that some brands are. So the tendency to want generic, might be predicated on a need for familiarity. This is precisely the reason I don’t read books with foreign settings, or books like The Hobbit…I don’t want to be lost in that landscape, confused about what everything means. I detest that in my own life, in my own landscape. I like familiar things. They ground me. I like specificity. It keeps things clear.

Second, it not only provides more elbow room for variants in references (i.e., “she headed for the Audi.”  “She headed for the car.”  “She headed for the A7″) but it’s also a device for character development. For instance, not salad dressing, but Miracle Whip. Not wine, but Barefoot Pink Moscato. Not phone, but iPhone. Not shoes, but Napoli Trekkers. Not car, but Audi A7. Not coffee, but Hazelnut with White Chocolate Macadamia nut creamer (and in a mug with a cute kitten on it)….

fyiSIDEBAR: I also recall a reader mentioning that my character’s use of electronic cigarettes was distracting. Again, this is a product not yet in the common usage lexicon, psychologically. So a reader will notice it more. The same was true for tobacco in fiction, until it became passé  to have characters smoking. (Watch any old black and white movie and you will suddenly notice how EVERYONE is smoking. It will seem odd and distracting).

Also, a character is partly elucidated by the choices they make, to include the products they use, the cars they drive, the clothes they wear, the food they eat…Brand suggests many things–taste, income, personality, beliefs, weaknesses…so using a specific brand name is intentional. It helps me communicate what I want you to know about a character.

Over the years I’ve read many books in which the author used only generic references to everything. Wine, cardboardcutoutsdrink, sandwich, sedan, convertible, phone, coffee….and I always had the thoughts, what kind? I wonder if this character likes white or red wine? I wonder if this character buys American or foreign? I wonder if this character likes expensive shoes or cheap ones? It kept me from gaining a full appreciation of that character, and tended to make them cardboard cutouts–and I find THAT distracting.

One might argue, the story’s the thing. Yes, the story is the thing, (nice of you to bring that up) but there would be no story without the characters and who they are. Character is equally important. And that means any device that allows the reader to understand them on deeper levels, make them seem like real people in their lives, is one more chance to draw that reader in and get her to read your book.

Be the first to like.

Diversify and Die

Kate_Dunedin_BeachNov12_480It’s so satisfying to sit at my desk and write to the sound of the ocean. Only this time, it’s not in my earbuds, but outside my window. Our move to Dunedin placed us within walking distance of the beach, and the rhythmic breath of the waves at shore soothes me. The cool, robust breeze from the water sometimes spits through our windows like a fire hose, but it helps regulate the temperature in this upstairs master suite, high above almost all other houses on this hillside. It’s Summer here, though luckily for me, the fall and winter-loving, heat-intolerant moi, there really hasn’t been much heat yet. Weather is weird everywhere, as I understand it.

Anyway, we’re finally settling in to our new home (not new, per se, but new to us), and we can both feel the pull of literary pursuits, engendered by the sense that the busy work of our lives calmed down, and we are able to deskpic16DDec12_320finally create some normal routines.

In OneNote, I have a tabbed list of blog ideas, just waiting for me to finish. Not so different from all the book ideas I also have–started or half-completed –just waiting for my attention. The problem isn’t that I don’t want to give my attention to them, it’s that I don’t have enough attention to go around. I really do look forward to the day when I can clone myself.

(Though Kate says in matters of sex, that would give her a heart attack.) teehee

That being said, (much to Kate’s chagrin) I will now give my attention to this blog post….

Kate and I talked a while back, before the move, about our writing–what our goals are, and the changes we are anticipating having to make.

In my quest to learn the craft of writing, I thought it would be helpful if I had the ability to write in any genre. bookgenresThus, over the years, I have managed to produce work in myriad categories. Fourteen, at last count. But it has become clear to me in recent months that my approach has not been wise. This diversification has only managed to erode the ground under my literary feet, and prevent me from getting a proper foothold in the market–especially when so many other writers have established theirs. And they are the ones who enjoy better sales. There’s a reason for that.

DeanKoontzspinesIt seems that most of THOSE-WHO-READ (myself included, though I made the error of thinking other readers behaved differently) tend to pick the type of book or author they like, or both, and then they continue to read that book/author. When they run out of an author’s work, they seek other authors who write in a similar genre and/or with a similar style. Thus, the readers who buy my books have read whichever genre of mine they are drawn to, and then discover there isn’t another book in that genre from me, and they move on to find those other authors they might also like who have books available which they have not read. This does not encourage a strong, growing readership.

Also, in diversifying myself as an author, I have failed to brand myself well enough to create the following that mybooks2012shelf_1268medprobably would have existed by now, after 29 books. Had those 29 books been in one genre, I would not have taken such a hit when digital publishing swelled to its current oceanic level. According to factzone.com, in America, a new book is published every 13 minutes. This groundswell of publishing is attributable to the ease with which we can now publish our work. Yes, that means more bad books from bad writers mucking up the booklist for the rest of us, but it also means more freedom, and demands that we employ smart-marketing techniques. Hence, the issue at hand with my diversification.

My highest sales occurred when I was writing in one genre for an extended period of time and had not gotten off that beaten path yet into nonfiction, for instance. Subsequently, my sales dropped. And right when I was getting used to having that rather large paycheck every month.

Kate also feels she needs to focus more on the mainstream horror genre she prefers to write in, and not give so much attention to the lesbian genre, which for a horror author, is a very small piece of the royalty pie. Not exactly a thriving subgenre yet.

The new plan for me is to refocus my energies on the lesbian fiction genre, even though I might not always write the same subgenre inside that. I need to rebrand myself as the author of a particular genre, and keep putting out books for it. It will mean rewriting what I have on five or six or seven partially completed books in order to fit my chosen genre, but the effort will probably be worth it. And I have noticed, in reframing those other stalled books, that it would solve the issues that stagnated them in the first place. Some of them were for the mainstream market and I just could not seem to get past a certain point with them. I suspect, because I should have been sticking with the one genre instead of branching out. Hopefully it will put me back on track to producing more books, more frequently.

{Cracking knuckles.} Now back to work.

typing2

3 people like this post.

Switch to our mobile site