Archive for the ‘BOOKS’ Category

Curse of Cache La Poudre (novella)

My new novella.

CCLPfrcvr_248Danica and Rikki have missed their plane, which couldn’t be worse news because now they might just miss their own wedding. When a pilot of a small plane offers to fly them there himself, they jump at the chance; after all, the man swears he has one short stop to deliver supplies to a ranger station in Cache la Poudre, then it’s clear skies all the way.

The only trouble is, the stop along the way turns into a destination all of its own, when the pilot, telling the women they’re his cargo, delivers them into the hands of an armed man. They’re needed for a babysitting job, whatever that means, but job or not, being kidnapped is not on Danica and Rikki’s itinerary. They have a wedding to get to, and a honeymoon, and being chased through the wilderness, while a great bonding exercise, is not the romantic getaway they were expecting.

Then there’s the ‘babysitting’. Even if they get away from the kidnappers, dare they leave without checking first that there’s not a baby there somewhere?

 

(Click cover to download on Smashwords)

on Amazon Kindle:
http://tinyurl.com/amf572e

 

Be the first to like.

Reading, Muses, Curses & the Pick-A-Project-Polka.

 

Since completing the third and fourth books (simultaneously) of the AKA Investigations series, I am doing that Writers-blockPick-A-Project-Polka; a dance we writers do when we’re trying to decide what we feel like working on next; we listen to our muse, we dance with our muse, we kick our muse out and get practical, and we sometimes curse our muse and send it to bed without dinner. All of these I’ve done this time around, as well.

Fortunately, I seem to have spent enough time on a particular draft to safely assume it’s the one I will be finishing next. I have always had a collection of half-written books that one day I intend to finish (Quintessence, Somewhere Else, and Another Justice, to name a few). Most writers can probably say that. But the interesting thing is being faced with tangible examples of how far you’ve come as a writer. Stories I recalled as really good, needing to be finished because of their value, I now look at, and consider them lining for a birdcage.

Take the one I’m rewriting, now….it started out years ago as The Curse of Madagascar. Then the TV series, Lost, began to air and I was afraid I’d be accused of plagiarism to some degree, if I tried to publish that story, even though I had written it years before the TV series came about.  The book was about a straight couple, newlyweds, who are on their way to Saint-Denis, in Africa for their honeymoon, and instead get stranded on a tropical island (Madagascar, though they don’t know where they are) after their transport boat sinks. They battle a shark, then get on shore with nothing, and struggle to survive in an environment that is filled with strange creatures, is unfriendly and mysterious, and soon discover there is something sinister going on, and their lives are in danger, because there are some villainous men who are using the island for….er…um…

Here is where the story fizzled (Honestly, it fizzled from the get-go, but for the sake of explanation–) I needed to pinpoint what the “curse” in the title referred to….

Originally, it was in third person omniscient, then I changed it to third person limited. Originally, it was also set in Africa, but then I decided I didn’t want to spend the research time necessary to write anything about a setting I knew little about, and opted instead to change the setting to Cache La Poudre, a wilderness area in Northern Colorado. I am familiar with my home state. Also, at different times it was about drugs, human trafficking, and I even considered something supernatural, likecatfacekeyboard the island was a living entity somehow, and perhaps it was a sort of purgatory, and my characters were already dead, but in some alternate reality after death (See? Very similar to Lost). It hardly mattered what my story was about, though, because the whole shebang was a cheese-fest. Dialogue smarmy and uber-romanticized, like something out of a bad Harlequin (not to suggest there was ever a GOOD Harlequin). But I noticed all the stereotyping I was doing, with gender-roles. I, of course, had to have the man save the woman, and she was, of course, weak and frightened and only able to feel safe while in his arms. Repugnant, all around.

[finger in my throat, and a retching noise].

So then, in the spirit of focusing my writing endeavors on the one genre (lesbian), and more importantly, in the spirit of putting my name only on stories I’m not ashamed of, I decided to rewrite what I already had on this story and finish it.

One rewrite focus area, as mentioned, was the dialogue–cheese-be-gone….another was the sentence structure. Too same-same, too often. Then I ran into that whole stylistic quagmire of having two females in almost every repeatkeyscene and getting tired of using “she” and “her” so having to fix that with sentence structure, and stylistic tricks. Another was beginning paragraphs and sentences with the same word repeatedly, over and over, again and again, until it became a repetitious, recapitulation, reiteration, replay, reproduction, rerun, reshowing and also a duplication.  Amazing, the little lessons we learn about our craft that we hardly notice until being faced with them in the form of our own literary apparitions, ghost stories from the past. My muse was quite wispy and frail back then. Largely attributable to my early years of reading too many of the aforementioned romance novels, and also watching too many soap operas. I learned how to write poorly from both (these sorts of things also have a way of retarding your intellect, as well). My writing only improved when I began to read more accomplished, masterful authors. Like Edgar Allen Poe, Edgar Rice Burroughs, Robert A. Heinlein and later, Dean Koontz (in whom I have lost interest in recent years, perhaps because his writing has become a little tedious–though I did learn a great deal by studying his writing, to find out what he was doing to get me to turn that page every time).

In fact, most of my reading experiences have been about finding a set of authors I could follow; but they were few and far between, and so I read widely in many genres, and ultimately discarded most of them after reading only one of their books.  It takes quite a lot to get me to turn a page, and if it’s not a strong enough pull, I will lay that book down and move on. I’ve always felt that there were not enough years in my life to read everything I want to read, so I am loath to read anything that isn’t a valuable use of my time. I can see how all of these experiences have shaped me as a writer.

I’ve always enjoyed the Maximum Ride series by James Patterson, even though I don’t usually read in the Youngplumisland_DeMille Adult genre. I found those books hugely entertaining and delightful and quick-reading, which was what I wanted at the time. And more recently, I enjoyed Gone Girl, by Gillian Flynn, but was disappointed in the cop-out ending–a particularly potent peeve of mine. And I have only a few days ago, discovered Nelson DeMille, and he’s shaping up to be a favorite, if this book, Plum Island, continues to be as good as it has been from page-one. I’m excited about this possibility, since I see the stacks and stacks of books he has just waiting for my hungry eyes to explore.

Over the last ten years or so, I’ve read far more nonfiction than fiction. I read many books by authors like Christopher Hitchens, Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins, Carl Sagan, George Smith, Stephen Hawking, and other authors in the science and atheism category, as well as a plethora of social psychology. It seemed to influence me to write nonfiction, which is why I strayed from the market and over-diversified myself into lower royalties.

But I was in a self-imposed curriculum, my own university, and the studies I did in religion, alone, would have garnered me a degree, if I had been doing it in an actual collegiate setting–perhaps a master’s thesis equivalent, in the three years it took me to write my 6-volume magnum opus, Supernatural Hypocrisy: The Cognitive Dissonance of a God Cosmology.  Additionally, I published a book of poetry (Yin & Yang: Poetry from Both Sides of my Disposition), a memoir (Falling through the Cracks: This Misadventures of No One Famous) compiled all my essays into volumes, (Like Too Much World, and Wear a Helmet, and Bettered by a Dead Crustacean) and even a volume of essays about writing in Don’t Fall in Love With Your Words (Fall in Love With Your Craft). I wrote a few nonfiction books for lesbians,  like ISO (In Search Of): The Art of Dating, Relationships & Sex for the Discerning Lesbian and Sullied Pajamas: A Discerning Lesbian on Dating, Relationships & Sex.

Throughout all this abandonment to the whims of my muse, I learned a great deal about the craft of writing and of the discipline of publishing and editing, but I was not being wise about the market. I said I didn’t care about that, I made enough money writing what I wanted to write, with no regard for what was popular. But then the royalties crashed when the ebook market opened up and my print books stopped selling while my electronic versions increased instead; but I was now competing with a whole horde of Indie authors, the successful ones of whom were writing series fiction and sticking to one genre. I had, as I said, diversified myself right out of a paycheck. And I was getting really fond of that extra money. Hopefully my rededication to one genre, and focus on series, will get me back on track.

Sales are surprisingly good for my two new ones Also Known as Syzygy and Also Known as Rising and Falling, which are numbers 3 and 4 on the AKA Investigations series. This tells me that there were readers out there justfingerscrossedkeyboard_324 waiting for me to continue that series. And I will continue to do that, while developing other series in the subgenres of lesbian fiction, and making most of them novellas since the trend seems to be shorter books, now. I guess people don’t have or make much time to read these days. Until then, I must keep my focus, and not stray into territory that I can’t occupy in a formidable way, and hope to gain an appreciable piece of the literary pie in that fashion.

Fingers crossed, when not typing.

 

Be the first to like.

Lunacy Factor: Make My Day (Excerpt)

excerpt from

Also Known As Rising & Falling

AKAR&Ffrcvr_138

( AKA Investigations Series, Book 4)

Ginger had stepped outside to make sure that Payne Hollister left the premises. She wished she could have arrested him, but the crime

had been so long ago, and there was no case to prosecute. Date rape, sadly, was a commonplace occurrence, and more often than not, left unreported.

Checking on Phoebe again before she had to leave for her late-shift, Ginger went down to the apartment to change, Izzy joining her.

Officer Appreciation Day was not what it sounded like. No parades, no award ceremonies. Just Detectives in the department taking shifts like a beat cop. Captain Campbell thought this was a good way to remind the plainclothes cops of what it was like to be a regular cop in uniform. It seemed to increase the working relationships at the station, but it was still not something Ginger Grant looked forward to.

“I can’t believe that dick showed up tonight.”

“I know.”

Izzy pulled out the coffee carafe, and paused to look at Ginger. “What are you doing?”

Ginger had been standing, immobile, by the door. “I’m trying to remember where I put my keys.”

“They’re not in the basket?”

“No.”

Izzy poured coffee in the waiting cup Ginger had provided. “Not in your pocket?”

“No, I’ve already looked in all the obvious places.” She came back into the room and scanned it, as if hoping the keys would jump up in the air so she could catch them.

“Don’t worry. Maybe you’re just getting senile.”

Ginger turned slowly, one eyebrow cocked, and probably loaded. “That might be humorous coming from someone my own age, but from you, it’s just a sharp stick.”

“Don’t hate me for being younger,” she said, putting the lid on the tumbler and handing it to Ginger.

In the living room area, Ginger began accosting the sofa cushions. “Most people are visual. And those images attach to something. With me, it just goes in, floats around, then when a stiff wind comes along, whooooosh–it’s gone.”

“Well, maybe you should plug the leaks. Wear earplugs…I mean, that’s a 99 cent fixer-upper.” She chuckled. “Or you could just put two marbles in your ears.”

“Oh I can’t do that, they’ll fall in and then that noise of them rolling around would keep me up at night.”

“You’re up at night anyway. You’re like a vampire.’

“A non-visual, marble-headed vampire.”

Izzy righted the askew cushion and plopped onto the sofa. “I’m sure some bleeding heart liberal group will take you on, don’t worry about it.”

“Ah!” The keys had fallen off the by the door hook and landed in one of Izzy’s shoes. “I’m late. I’ll call you later.” She scooted over and kissed the top of Izzy’s head.

As Ginger left through the rear exit stairs, and pulled out of the drive, she wondered if her decision to skip the afternoon nap and her delay was really self-sabotage. Like a petulant school girl, she didn’t want to go to work tonight. It was Officer Awareness Day. She was aware of being an officer, and didn’t need to be reminded, thank you very much. But Captain Campbell’s pet project demanded detectives spend one day of the month patrolling, like they did when they were beat cops. No matter what, this day was always bizarre. For some reason, it was like the universe knew she was out of her comfort zone, and it wanted to make the most of the torture session.

Today, Ginger was to join Sergeant Chloe Eckert on patrol in a neighborhood that was largely a retirement village. She could only imagine the heyday the universe was going to have with that one. Senile old people. There but for the grace of whomever, go I, she thought. The prophesy awaited fulfillment.

At the Windsor Meadows Security Office parking lot, Ginger locked up the Cherryot and slid into Sergeant Eckert’s black and white. She was greeted with a box of Krispy Kreme donuts. “Oh, you shouldn’t have.”

“Blatant attempt at being your toady.” She buckled her seat belt.

Ginger sunk her teeth into the doughnut and made a sound not unlike sexual pleasure. “What is it you think I can do for you?”

“You can’t say things like that while making those sounds. It could be construed as sexual harassment.”

“So arrest me. You’re the one who brought the evil donuts.”

Chloe smiled, shook back her colorful hair; brown, with blonde and red highlights. It had been the first thing Ginger noticed about ChloeEckertthe officer when they met a few months ago on a domestic violence call. Her hair. She was pretty sure Chloe was gay, too, but didn’t feel it was appropriate to bring it up. Ginger would certainly have asked her out, if there was no Izzy in the picture. But she had no complaints in that department. “Still. Not sure why you’d toady me. I’m just a detective.”

“Just a detective?” Chloe almost squeaked. “You’re like a fucking rock star, and I’m like your groupie.”

Ginger lowered a brow at her. “Seriously?”

“I’m not the only one, either. I don’t think you realize how much some of the female cops admire you. You’re inspiring to us. And…” She pushed the visor back in place, clipped a pen in the elastic. “I just took the detective’s exam.”

“Really? Good for you, Chloe. We need more female D’s. I’m sure you’ll pass with high marks. But tonight, I’m on your turf. I’m just a beat cop like you. So, you’re in charge. What do beat cops do these days?”

Chloe pointed to the last bite of glazed doughnut in Ginger’s hand. “You’re off to a damn good start.” She punched up the GPS on the unit laptop. “Have you ever worked this area?”

“Nope. Anything I should know up front? Give me the four-one-one on Windsor Meadows.”

Chloe put the cruiser in gear and pulled out onto the main street. “It’s a fucking asylum.”

“OAD shift, a full moon, and an asylum. This should be interesting.”

“It will be. You’re aware this is a retirement village. But it also seems to have an inordinate concentration of senility, mixed with some weird lunacy factor that must be emanating from the ground. Maybe they have radon gas underneath this place.”

“So, boredom, probably not a concern tonight.”

Chloe glanced at her. “Um…no.” Chloe grabbed the handset from the dash and notified dispatch. “Eckert and Grant in the saddle at Windsor Meadows.”

“Ten-four,” the dispatcher said.

Ginger pulled a second doughnut out of the box. “Can we just eat all of these now, so I can focus?”

Chloe laughed. “You have to pace yourself, Ginger-Bear.”

Their first call was to a high rise apartment building where the AARP crowd thrived. Two 70 year old women were involved in a domestic dispute, according to a giggling dispatcher.

It seemed that one woman was trying to ram the other woman with her Hoveround. The recipient of this scooter-attack had called Denver PD. Ginger said into her shoulder-mic, derisively, “Really.”

“Yes. REALLY. I promise,” the dispatcher giggled.

“It has begun,” Chloe said solemnly. “This is the same address I was called to last month, only that time, Miss Rita-of-the-Hoveround had blown herself up when she smoked too close to her oxygen tank. There was a small fire on the carpet that looked like the long fuse of a detonation device, and Miss Rita was found on the floor with burns on her right arm.”

“Lovely.”

“And, while I was trying to interview her around the ministrations of the paramedic, she oldladyscooter1had the cheek to ask for a cigarette. Apparently, she needed one because blowing herself up had caused her some stress.”

Ginger laughed under her breath. “Jesus.”

At this current call, Ginger and Chloe took the key to the scooter until Miss Rita calmed down, and then went on their way. Ginger jotted notes for the report.

No sooner had the two paid for their first cup of coffee at the local Starbucks, than another call came through about an accident at a private garage only a few blocks away. The old woman had hit the garage door remote button twice accidentally, so it closed and she didn’t realize, and backed right through it. “My foot slipped off the brake,” the woman said defensively.

“So you hit the gas?” Ginger asked her.

Chloe just smiled knowingly though the whole thing, and offered, as they walked back to the cruiser, “It’s day-backward and I have too much hands on my time.”

Ginger left the scene with a caveat emptor: senior citizens should never be allowed to operate motorized vehicles.

At the next call, they were summoned to another high rise apartment building a few miles away. An old man had dropped his cell phone down the elevator shaft. This particular elevator was notorious for stopping between floors, and that’s how it was when they found it. Chloe said she’d have to jump down under it to get the phone. Good thing it was on the first floor, so that the only way it could go when someone pushed the button, was up. She considered just calling the fire department, but the old geezer was beside himself, since his phone was his lifeline–by the looks of him, a lifeline he sorely needed. The man said, “I’ll hold the door for you.”

Chloe said, “No, Officer Grant will take care of it, because you’ll get distracted and wander off and I’ll be trapped under the elevator and get squished.”

Ginger held the doors open with her own body, as Chloe made quick work of hopping down and grabbing the phone, and climbing back out. When she handed the old guy his cell, he said, “What are you doing with my phone?”

Rolling her eyes, Chloe just bid him a good day and Ginger followed her back out to the car to write it up. The full moon was doing its job. The lunacy factor was alive and well.

They cruised by the other cop on that beat, waved to him cordially. It was a rookie named Josh, who rode with Chloe on one of these Awareness patrols, while he was still in training. He used to be an Army scout; those are the guys who trudge along in front of everyone else and watch for danger. They’re, unfortunately, the first to take a bullet or trip a wire. Chloe soon learned why he was an Army scout. His platoon-mates wanted him dead.

chupacabra“I got his number a few months ago,” Chloe told Ginger. “when he drew down one night on a plastic coyote that the residents had placed outside to scare the geese away.” She took the roundabout back into Windsor. “Somehow, he saw the thing and was startled, so dropped to the ground with his gun out. The coyote wasn’t moving, so he crawled over and poked it with his gun. He told me later he thought it was a chupacabra.”

You’re making this up,” Ginger laughed.

“If I’m lyin’ I’m dyin’. I asked him another night where his weapon was, and he found it slid around to his back, because he wasn’t wearing keeper tabs on his belt, and had pulled his coat over his weapon, too, leaving the access zipper closed. That boy was one shift shy of having his own placard on the Line of Duty death wall.”

As Chloe guided the unit through the serene streets of Windsor Meadows, they passed a man with a pot belly, who looked oddly like he was with-child. “That’s Pregnant Don, on his way to the community center.” She honked and waved at him as she went by.

As darkness shrouded the streets, the winter chill swelling the air, Ginger turned the heater up.

Chloe gave her a look.

“What? My arms are cold.”

“Not on the inside.”

Ginger rolled her eyes. “That’s like: ‘it’s hot today’ — ‘not in Canada’. Kinda not the point.”

Chloe laughed, as a new call came through. There were people moving around in an old woman’s attic. Chloe lifted a knowing eyebrow at Ginger.

When they investigated, they discovered there were no people in the attic, and indeed, no attic. Chloe told the woman she had scared them away and they wouldn’t be bothering her anymore, and hoped she remembered to take her medication. This was the same woman that used to keep her important papers hidden in the oven, but got hungry and preheated it, causing a fire that burned all those papers up. Chloe said that once, the same woman reported that “hoodlums” were rattling the doors as they went down the hall of the floor she lived on. The lady called dispatch frequently with the same report.

Officer Eckert responded to this complaint by traversing the hall in question, rattling knobs.

Ginger laughed. “What are you doing?”

“Terrorizing a crazy lady.”

When they went in to talk to the lady, giving her the obligatory I ran-the-hoodlums-off-and-they-won’t-be-bothering-you-anymore spiel, she noticed the refrigerator in the middle of the kitchen. “Why is your ‘fridge in the middle of kitchen?” Ginger asked her.

“How else are you supposed to clean behind it?”

Heavy sighs shared. It was obvious, the fridge was kept right there in the middle of the floor and the woman just walked around it. Ginger was afraid to ask how she actually got it there.

A man named Barry had summoned them to say there was voodoo in his apartment.

“Where?” Ginger asked.

He showed her. It was in his chair, on his carpet.

It was dirt. The path through his apartment was thick with dirt. Voodoo dirt. He said the woman upstairs, a Miss Beecher, was putting voodoo on him, among other things. She assured him she would go up there and talk to her. When she knocked, the woman saw her and sighed. “What now?”

eggvibratortableGinger had trouble concentrating because Miss Beecher had one of those egg vibrators on the table next to her chair. She almost forgot why they were there. Chloe’s eyes went to the egg and back to Ginger, and the desire to laugh was almost overwhelming. Chloe did a good job of maintaining her composure, but Ginger felt a case of screaming meemies coming on.

Chloe cleared her throat. “Um…Mr. Barry says you’re putting voodoo on him, and he wants you to please stop.”

Ginger was smiling as Miss Beecher commenced with the eye-rolling.

Readjusting her duty belt, Chloe added, “He said you were after him and tried to kiss him, and so if you would just stop trying to kiss him, that would really help me out.”

The old woman giggled. “He tried to kiss ME one day and I said you do it again I’ll punch you in the mouth. Maybe that’s what is really bothering him.”

“Well, now, it’s voodoo.”

Ginger and Chloe went back down to Mr. Barry’s apartment and gave him the update. “I yelled at Miss Beecher and she’s agreed to stop the voodoo.” Chloe told him. She wasn’t lying. She really had asked her to stop.

Mr. Barry was not convinced. “You said that last time! They always say that, but it keeps happening!” He then informed Chloe that she needed to be arrested for murder because she wasn’t doing anything about it. “Nobody’s dead! How can I be arrested for murder when no one’s dead?”

There was indeed a reason why they called it lunacy. It was from the word, lunar, meaning moon. As that full shining orb hung in the night sky, their evening was further entertained by an old guy who drove his car up on the sidewalk and hit a fire hydrant. They did have to call the fire department for that one. Water was spewing everywhere. While returning to their patrol car, Ginger said, “Yah, if you can’t see, it’s best to drive really fast and buy a really big car.”

Before they’d even reached the vehicle, dispatch notified them of a suspect fleeing a suspected drug deal, and Ginger perked up. “Finally. A normal call.”

They caught sight of him running across the roundabout, fenced him in between a couple of houses, and they both just stood there watching him running around a tree, in an effort to find a way out. “If you run around a tree enough times,” Ginger intoned, “you become invisible.”

“Oh, to be 17 again,” Chloe added.

“I know, right?” Ginger reached for her cuffs in at the back of her belt and they moved toward him.

“You don’t grow brains until about 30.”

“And sometimes not even then.” Ginger circled her finger at him as a signal to turn around. He assumed the position when he realized he wasn’t going anywhere. After cuffing him, she began the pat-down. “Got anything that’s gonna poke me, stick me or piss me off?”

He did, of course, have all three.

 

 

There were downtimes, and Chloe would periodically park at certain vantage points while they waited for the next call. Chloe regaled Ginger with stories about  previous calls at Windsor Meadows, while they polished off the rest of the doughnuts.

“Now I’ll have to actually go to the gym to work these off.” Ginger closed the lid of the donut box and tossed it in the back seat.

Chloe patted her stomach. “I prefer sexercise.”

Ginger smiled. “Sounds like a better idea. Now the doughnuts don’t seem so evil anymore.”

“It’s not so bad, really. I enjoy pulling Windsor every so often. It’s a nice break from the usual fare, and always good for a laugh.”

“I’ve actually had a good time tonight,” Ginger admitted. “Probably the least dangerous patrol in Denver.”

“Yeah, they stick lots of rooks in Windsor. You can see why. It’s usually pretty innocuous here. But there are a few gangbangers over in Pine Village across the main drag. And where there’s gangs, there’s drugs. So every now and then we’ll get one of those…tree-orbitals.”

The last call was about a complaint that a Mrs. Gentry reported, saying that not only were the neighbors stealing her electricity, but now they were trying to steal her brains. In the report, Ginger added, It is this officer’s opinion that this has already occurred.

Before clocking out back at the station, Ginger would also have to stop at the security office for the village, charged with the unenviable task of looking over the reports of the other officers on that shift. She dreaded reading the Box-O-Rocks collection. That was the moniker Chloe had given to rookie Josh, because he was as dumb as a box of rocks. The boy had no acquaintance with commas and periods, and it sometimes completely changed the meaning of his reports. He couldn’t spell either. And it always took him two hours to write his reports out. Probably why he waited until the end of shift to do it. Once, Chloe had told him, “Learn to use commas and periods. Don’t worry about the semicolons and stuff, but jeez.” She made the mistake of saying, “Every time you take a breath, use a comma.” She then read through his next report and said, “Do you have COPD?”

Be the first to like.

AKA # 4: Also Known as Rising & Falling -Now Available!

AKAR&Ffrcvr_138Now available on Smashwords: Book 4 in the Aka Investigations Series,

Also Known as Rising & Falling.

(Book 3 was just made available a few days ago–read that one first! And if you haven’t read #1 and #2, read them all in order, okay? Okay)

Here’s an excerpt….(Jobeth is recovering from a fall down the stairs, caused by the slippers she was wearing)

 

~15~

Cranky-Pants & Furbabies

 

Consciousness crept in again on drug-addled feet, and Jobeth immediately saw the close-up view of slippers on her chest. The ones that caused her fall down the stairs. She looked over at a smiling Izzy standing next to the bed. “Cute. When I am able to get out of this bed, I’m going to beat you with them.”

Izzy dismissed the empty threat. “Are you awake enough to talk?”

“Until the drugs kick in again.” Jobeth reached for the prescription bottle with her left hand. “The laptop keeps waking me up. I keep putting it on sleep mode and it keeps waking up.”

“Maybe it’s not tired,” Izzy suggested, sitting down on the bed. “Do you need me to fluff your pillow?”

“It’s memory foam. It fluffs itself.”

Izzy nodded, smiling. “Okay then. Listen, I think we have a new case.”

Digging out the Darvocet with a finger, Jobeth popped it in her mouth and washed it down with the water on the nightstand. “Who?”

“Ponzi Bonnet.”

“Who?”

“That friend of Phoebe’s. She thinks her husband might be thinking about killing her. Or maybe just having an affair. Or maybe wanting to kill her because he’s having an affair…”

“I thought it was the pain meds. Her name is really Ponzi Bonnet?”

“Yep. And she’s just as weird as her name is.”

“How’s that?”

Izzy pulled a half-eaten rice cracker off the comforter and held it up. Jobeth snatched it with her left hand and popped it in her mouth, chewing. “Do go on.”

“Well, according to Ponzi herself, she’s got some issues…kind of reclusive, has a sleep disorder, and no telling what else.”

“And you don’t think that has something to do with why she thinks her husband is trying to kill her?”

“I have a sleep disorder.”

“See?”

Izzy gave her a raspberry sound. “Maybe. But I have to say, there are suspicious things happening…” Izzy went through the incidents that sent Ponzi to her conclusions. “And Phoebe says Ponzi is so worried about it, that she thought it might be better safe than sorry. She thinks I ought to tail him for a while and see what he’s up to.”

“Well, as long as we’re getting paid, I don’t care.”

“Here’s the interesting part. Ponzi is stinking rich, and her husband is a psychiatrist, and he’s the one who said she needed some help with these issues.”

Jobeth reached for the water bottle again, and washed down the cracker. The meds were giving her an awful case of cotton-mouth. “That’s a little convenient, if he really is going to kill her.”

“That’s what I thought,” Izzy said. “He could fling her off a building and then say she did it to herself, thinking she could fly.”

“Right. Actually, that would be the best way to get away with it…” She looked around for more crackers. “Maybe he’s planning the perfect crime.”

“Not perfect if we catch him at it.”

“Well, keep an eye on him for a few days and see if anything seems weird…and more importantly, bring me some rice crackers.”

“Will do.” Izzy stood up.

“Wait…” Jobeth said.

Izzy waited for a few beats. “What?”

She seemed confused. “I was going to say something…”

“And I was going to be riveted,” Izzy cracked.

Frowning, Jobeth said, “I’m the witty one. You don’t get to be witty.”

“Witty is genetic, apparently. Don’t fight it.” She started for the door again and paused, studying her sister. “It bothers you that I’m doing this stuff without you, doesn’t it?”

“You’re stealing my thunder.”

“I’m stealing a few drops of rain, that’s all. It’s not exactly exciting.”

“Part of the job. But sometimes it can get interesting.”

“Yeah, when will that happen?”

“It will happen when…something happens.”

Izzy snorted. “How much medication are you on?”

“Not enough, apparently, because it hasn’t taken away the pain of your presence.”

“Oh, all right, cranky-pants. I’ll let you go back to sleep.” Izzy paused at the door, eying the discarded footwear by the bed. “Oh, do you want me to fetch your slippers?”

“Vamoose!”

Izzy laughed and closed the door on her way out.

 

Be the first to like.

Also Known As Syzygy now available!

Syzygyfrcvr_15Dec12_248Now Available!!! Also Known as Syzygy, book 3 in the AKA Investigations series

SYNOPSIS:

On December 3, 2012, Saturn, Venus & Mercury aligned. On that same night, three women align to see that justice is done.

Ponzi Bonnet thought she had found the perfect husband. A psychologist could certainly understand her damage. But her suspicion of infidelity turns out to be something far worse. Far more sinister. And he had to be stopped.

Kenda Harper, an actress and Ponzi’s best friend, will do anything to help. Even if it means endangering her own life and denying the yearning in her heart.

Anna Dew, an artist and HSP, could not tell her friend Ponzi why she pulled away, but when she learns that her solution only enables bad men to do bad things, she is compelled to make it right.

Three women, finding strength amid their weaknesses, embarking on a journey into darkness, and the labyrinths of selfhood, match wits with the men who would inflict harm on other women, and they won’t give up until justice is done.

smashwordslogoamazonprintKindlelogo

 

ALSO–The first book in this series (Armchair Detective) is FREE on Smashwords for a limited time.

ACDFrCvr23May11_138x210

 

 

Be the first to like.

Distracting Fiction: Brand vs. Generic

Recently, a reader mentioned my use of specific products in my books, and called it “distracting.”

brand_productsFirst of all, this reader I mentioned is from New Zealand, and I write toward an American audience. These product names and brands I might use are all familiar to American readers, and so it does create a clearer picture for them than it would a reader who might not even recognize what that some brands are. So the tendency to want generic, might be predicated on a need for familiarity. This is precisely the reason I don’t read books with foreign settings, or books like The Hobbit…I don’t want to be lost in that landscape, confused about what everything means. I detest that in my own life, in my own landscape. I like familiar things. They ground me. I like specificity. It keeps things clear.

Second, it not only provides more elbow room for variants in references (i.e., “she headed for the Audi.”  “She headed for the car.”  “She headed for the A7″) but it’s also a device for character development. For instance, not salad dressing, but Miracle Whip. Not wine, but Barefoot Pink Moscato. Not phone, but iPhone. Not shoes, but Napoli Trekkers. Not car, but Audi A7. Not coffee, but Hazelnut with White Chocolate Macadamia nut creamer (and in a mug with a cute kitten on it)….

fyiSIDEBAR: I also recall a reader mentioning that my character’s use of electronic cigarettes was distracting. Again, this is a product not yet in the common usage lexicon, psychologically. So a reader will notice it more. The same was true for tobacco in fiction, until it became passé  to have characters smoking. (Watch any old black and white movie and you will suddenly notice how EVERYONE is smoking. It will seem odd and distracting).

Also, a character is partly elucidated by the choices they make, to include the products they use, the cars they drive, the clothes they wear, the food they eat…Brand suggests many things–taste, income, personality, beliefs, weaknesses…so using a specific brand name is intentional. It helps me communicate what I want you to know about a character.

Over the years I’ve read many books in which the author used only generic references to everything. Wine, cardboardcutoutsdrink, sandwich, sedan, convertible, phone, coffee….and I always had the thoughts, what kind? I wonder if this character likes white or red wine? I wonder if this character buys American or foreign? I wonder if this character likes expensive shoes or cheap ones? It kept me from gaining a full appreciation of that character, and tended to make them cardboard cutouts–and I find THAT distracting.

One might argue, the story’s the thing. Yes, the story is the thing, (nice of you to bring that up) but there would be no story without the characters and who they are. Character is equally important. And that means any device that allows the reader to understand them on deeper levels, make them seem like real people in their lives, is one more chance to draw that reader in and get her to read your book.

Be the first to like.

Diversify and Die

Kate_Dunedin_BeachNov12_480It’s so satisfying to sit at my desk and write to the sound of the ocean. Only this time, it’s not in my earbuds, but outside my window. Our move to Dunedin placed us within walking distance of the beach, and the rhythmic breath of the waves at shore soothes me. The cool, robust breeze from the water sometimes spits through our windows like a fire hose, but it helps regulate the temperature in this upstairs master suite, high above almost all other houses on this hillside. It’s Summer here, though luckily for me, the fall and winter-loving, heat-intolerant moi, there really hasn’t been much heat yet. Weather is weird everywhere, as I understand it.

Anyway, we’re finally settling in to our new home (not new, per se, but new to us), and we can both feel the pull of literary pursuits, engendered by the sense that the busy work of our lives calmed down, and we are able to deskpic16DDec12_320finally create some normal routines.

In OneNote, I have a tabbed list of blog ideas, just waiting for me to finish. Not so different from all the book ideas I also have–started or half-completed –just waiting for my attention. The problem isn’t that I don’t want to give my attention to them, it’s that I don’t have enough attention to go around. I really do look forward to the day when I can clone myself.

(Though Kate says in matters of sex, that would give her a heart attack.) teehee

That being said, (much to Kate’s chagrin) I will now give my attention to this blog post….

Kate and I talked a while back, before the move, about our writing–what our goals are, and the changes we are anticipating having to make.

In my quest to learn the craft of writing, I thought it would be helpful if I had the ability to write in any genre. bookgenresThus, over the years, I have managed to produce work in myriad categories. Fourteen, at last count. But it has become clear to me in recent months that my approach has not been wise. This diversification has only managed to erode the ground under my literary feet, and prevent me from getting a proper foothold in the market–especially when so many other writers have established theirs. And they are the ones who enjoy better sales. There’s a reason for that.

DeanKoontzspinesIt seems that most of THOSE-WHO-READ (myself included, though I made the error of thinking other readers behaved differently) tend to pick the type of book or author they like, or both, and then they continue to read that book/author. When they run out of an author’s work, they seek other authors who write in a similar genre and/or with a similar style. Thus, the readers who buy my books have read whichever genre of mine they are drawn to, and then discover there isn’t another book in that genre from me, and they move on to find those other authors they might also like who have books available which they have not read. This does not encourage a strong, growing readership.

Also, in diversifying myself as an author, I have failed to brand myself well enough to create the following that mybooks2012shelf_1268medprobably would have existed by now, after 29 books. Had those 29 books been in one genre, I would not have taken such a hit when digital publishing swelled to its current oceanic level. According to factzone.com, in America, a new book is published every 13 minutes. This groundswell of publishing is attributable to the ease with which we can now publish our work. Yes, that means more bad books from bad writers mucking up the booklist for the rest of us, but it also means more freedom, and demands that we employ smart-marketing techniques. Hence, the issue at hand with my diversification.

My highest sales occurred when I was writing in one genre for an extended period of time and had not gotten off that beaten path yet into nonfiction, for instance. Subsequently, my sales dropped. And right when I was getting used to having that rather large paycheck every month.

Kate also feels she needs to focus more on the mainstream horror genre she prefers to write in, and not give so much attention to the lesbian genre, which for a horror author, is a very small piece of the royalty pie. Not exactly a thriving subgenre yet.

The new plan for me is to refocus my energies on the lesbian fiction genre, even though I might not always write the same subgenre inside that. I need to rebrand myself as the author of a particular genre, and keep putting out books for it. It will mean rewriting what I have on five or six or seven partially completed books in order to fit my chosen genre, but the effort will probably be worth it. And I have noticed, in reframing those other stalled books, that it would solve the issues that stagnated them in the first place. Some of them were for the mainstream market and I just could not seem to get past a certain point with them. I suspect, because I should have been sticking with the one genre instead of branching out. Hopefully it will put me back on track to producing more books, more frequently.

{Cracking knuckles.} Now back to work.

typing2

3 people like this post.

Also Known as Syzygy (The Next Big Thing Blog Hop)

typingsmileThe Next Big Thing Blog Hop, wherein writers talk about their current Work in Progress (WIP), has apparently been going strong for 26 weeks, and so many writers have taken part, that I had a hard time finding the originator of the idea… I could have found it, eventually, but then, that would have me spending way too much time on Google, and not enough writing. I’ve been guilty of that before. Guilty of that often. Guilty. Most of the time. Did I mention I’m legally changing my middle name to Google? But this NBT Blog Hop thing has taken root in cyberspace and it’s spreading. It’s like an Internet fungus. Okay, that was too pejorative to say about a vocation I love. Kudzu? No…let’s see….how about it’s blossoming like a well-tended garden?

So wherever it came from, it found its way to me, via my favorite novelist, Kate Genet, who tagged me to participate. Now, I must say, if I’m going to get tagged, there’s no one I’d rather be TAGGED BY than Kate Genet. (I speak with appreciable credibility because she is my soon-to-be-wife, and did tag me just the other night, or did I tag her?didisaythat

Mmm…I digress. In the most delicious way…).

 

So I’m it, and here it goes….

 

What is the working title of your book?

Also Known as Syzygy. It was just “Syzygy” but then the book intertwines with my series (AKA Investigations), and now I’m thinking I might have to use the AKA tag. I have mentioned this book in one of my most recent posts, Prequels, Sequels, & Spinoffs

Where did the idea for the book come from?

Syzygyfrcvr_15Dec12_248It sprang from the first draft pages of my AKA Investigations Series, Book 3. I was getting so bogged down in the plot machinations, filling my dry erase board and desk pad and index cards with scribbles and bubbles and off-shoot ideas….and suddenly my main characters had been pushed into the background, and the secondary and tertiary characters were taking over the story. So in a fit of brilliance (which looks very much like a Grand Mal seizure, and may or may not have come from Kate–though she doesn’t have seizures when she has ideas) I figured out that maybe I was trying to write two different books–maybe this other one wanted to be written first.

But because of this intertwining with the main characters of my AKA series, I was dealing with a whole new species–at least for me. Syzygy is like a spinoff-prequel, as the events in it happen parallel to the other story of my main characters, with only a slight difference in timeline. But the book was unique also in that it wasn’t just a sequel or a spinoff, but it was an alternate point of view, in the sense of not being the usual First Person or Third Person Omniscient, but Third Person Limited, and also in the sense that details about the events behind the scenes, going on with the other characters, during the same storyline. I found the concept fiercely intriguing.

 What genre does the book fall under?

I always have trouble with this because my books cross so many genres, and I like the mix of them in one book. I’ve never been big on formulas. I want the story to tell itself without the restriction of a literary box. But, of course, we have to choose a category when we publish, and so I would call it Mainstream-Lesbian-PsychologicalSuspense-Mystery-Adventure——-drat… It’s really more about bad people being bad, and women being people, not women being lesbians. Although there are lesbians as main characters. Did you get that?

Which actors would you choose to play your characters in a movie?

In this current one, I don’t have that many in mind…I see Sara Ramirez (Dr. Callie Torres from Grey’s Anatomy) in the role of Detective Ginger Grant. For the others, I have pictures in my Pinterest account for some of them, but they are just models (usually for hairstyle mags) that have a sort of look I imagine. I have to do this because I have trouble holding images of them in my head. That’s a weird visual cortex sort of thing for me, so I collect images of my characters and sometimes the other “props” and locations in my books.

What is the one line synopsis of your book?

On December 3, 2012, Saturn, Venus & Mercury will align. On that same night, three women align to see that justice is done.

What is the long version of the synopsis?

(not a final version, but just because you asked)

Ponzi Bonnet thought she had found the perfect husband. A psychologist could certainly understand her damage. But her suspicion of his infidelity turns out to be something far worse. Far more sinister. And he had to be stopped.

Kenda Harper, an actress and Ponzi’s best friend, will do anything to help. Even if it means endangering her own life and denying the yearning in her heart.

Anna Dew, an artist and HSP, could not tell her friend Ponzi why she pulled away, but when she learns that her decision only enabled bad men to do bad things, she is compelled to make it right.

Three women, finding strength amid their weaknesses, embarking on a common journey into darkness, and the labyrinths of selfhood, match wits with the men who would inflict harm on other women, and they won’t give up until justice is done.

Will your book be self-published or represented by an agency?

I’m an Indie Author and Publisher so, self-published. I prefer to have creative control over everything. I turned down two book contracts because they would not have done any more for me than I can do for myself, and I make about 80% of the profits, whereas with a publisher, I would have gotten 15%. And to make sure the cover doesn’t end up looking like some dime-store Harlequin from the 50′s (as I’ve noticed is the case with many lesbian presses).

And I don’t like someone telling me what I can and cannot write. I write what I want to write, what I feel needs to be written; this way, I also don’t have deadlines, so this allows me the freedom I prefer. Even if that freedom includes lounging in bed too long with Kate.

How long did it take you to write the first draft of your manuscript?

I had been trying to write Book 3 of AKA series for the last year or so, but life got in the way. I was experiencing a dry spell in my creativity for the first time in my career. Too much was happening to me, and somehow I lost track of my muse. I found her again (her name is Kate Genet, as mentioned above). Once I figured out that the book I was working on was really two books, I think it took about two and a half months, writing intermittently. My production always speeds up when I get about three-quarters of it done–on those days I might write 3000 to 7000 words. So the first draft is done now, and I will do the rewrites and corrections when my darling Kate finishes reading it and hands over her notes.

Who or what inspired you to write this book?

This book was not a conscious decision…I didn’t say, oh, I want to write about yadda-yadda…the characters began to take over and seemed to have a bigger story to tell than what I was giving them, so I listened to that. As I swam deeper into it, I recognized certain motifs and themes which were unintentional in a conscious sense, but there were patterns there, and I realized it was a story that needed to be told; there are things happening behind the scenes that the general public might have no inkling of. Dark things. Things that make the rest of us appreciate what we have.

What else about the book might pique the reader’s interest?

This book is a departure for me–appropriate for a spinoff, eh? ;^)  The style and tone is even different than my usual fare–it’s darker, for one thing. I most often mix humor and drama to create “dramedy” when I write a story. I prefer that handsagainstglasscombination. But this one did not lend itself to much humor and I had to intentionally go back and add some levity by creating some other characters. It worked out well, because those characters turned out to be important to the plot. But Syzygy is written in Third Person Limited, from various Points of View. My books are generally either First Person Limited or Third Person Omniscient Narrator. Thus, in this book I was taxed with the need to write from the mind of characters I neither liked nor fully understood. I had to write their thoughts, when those thoughts were abhorrent to me. I had to imagine what their motivations were, and how they would respond to certain situations, when I could not even fathom being in that situation in the first place. I also found that tense and point of view was a real beast for me to keep control of. I made some very amateur mistakes and am thankful for the proofing and beta reading Kate has been doing for me…she has spotted many things I missed, and forced me out of my comfort zone.

Now, when I write the Book 3 (or maybe it will be 3.5? or 4?) I will have to be mindful that everything that happens there has to match the timeline and most of the details in Syzygy, but just shifted into the POV of the other characters. That’s going to be a challenge. This whole book was a huge challenge, but I never want to be accused of writing the same story over and over, so I’m perfectly content to let characters and stories surprise me.

That’s where most of the joy is, anyway.

1 person likes this post.

“mixture of humor, gut wrenching terror & emotional heartbreak amongst the action and romance” Review

Review of Also Known as DNA

by Terry at Affinity eBooks

AKA Investigations Series Book 2

Jobeth O’Brien and her partner, Phoebe McMasters, are enjoying a peaceful life together on Manor Lane in Colorado after moving from Oklahoma. Jobeth has her P.I License and has her own agency, AKA Investigations. Their new start together is suddenly interrupted by ghosts from the past.

First of all, Jobeth’s estranged sister Izzy turns up out of the blue. At first Jobeth and Izzy don’t appear to get on too well together. But as they get to know one another, that changes. Izzy turns out to be more like Jobeth than either of them thought.

Phoebe’s past comes back to haunt her. In fact, it causes heartbreak for both Phoebe and Jobeth in a big way.

Ginger, Jobeth and Phoebe’s detective friend, has moved to Colorado with them and occupies the cottage behind their house. Ginger is looking for love. Will she find it? Ginger and Izzy appear to get on well together. But Izzy is a lot younger than Ginger and she’s not into relationships. Will Ginger get her heart broken?

It will take the ingenuity of all four of these women to get rid of the ghosts from the past. But will they be able to keep themselves alive to outwit the deranged felons?

***

Even though the plot to this story stretched my imagination a bit, I actually thoroughly enjoyed the story.

I loved Jobeth, Phoebe and Ginger from Armchair Detective and to have them back again is a true pleasure. Izzy has joined the three other women and her character has fit right in with the others. They all interact so well together and play an essential part in furthering the story.

I don’t want to add any spoilers in here, but suffice it say that the story is a rollercoaster ride of twists and turns throughout. There are so many ups and downs, the book is a real page turner from start to finish.

There is a mixture of humor, gut wrenching terror and emotional heartbreak amongst the action and romance. If anything, this story is even better than the first one. Both books are standalone, but I would strongly advise reading Armchair Detective first. It gives more of the characters background. Plus you would be missing out on another good book if you don’t.

I’m hoping there will be another in this series soon.

Be the first to like.

Prequels, Sequels, & Spinoffs

Syzygy. Amazingly, the only English word with three Y’s also happens to describe a rare astronomical event involving three heavenly bodies. A syzygy is the alignment of three celestial bodies in a straight line…

On December 3, 2012, Saturn, Venus & Mercury will align. On that same night, 3 women align to see that justice is done.

Ponzi Bonnet thought she had found the perfect husband. A psychologist could certainly understand her damage. But her suspicion of infidelity turns out to be something far worse. Far more sinister. And he had to be stopped.

This new book I’m working on–and almost finished with–is altogether different from any of my others. For one, it’s darker. I usually like to write “dramedy”– an equal mixture of drama and comedy. And I lean toward romantic – suspense – adventure -style plots. The plot in Syzygy is adventuresome, but perhaps that’s where the similarity ends. It deals with some darker subjects. Some disturbing places in the human psyche. I’m not sure of it…I haven’t even let Kate read any of it. She will be acting as my first Beta reader, because I want an impression based on the entire book, without any foreknowledge of content. (Just like most readers get to approach a book). But this has also made it more challenging, because I can’t discuss it with her to help me work things out–to be fair, or to perhaps torture me, she is also keeping mum on her current book (Irrevocable). I will be Beta reader on that one too.

So here’s what happened….I had been working on the 3rd in my AKA Investigations series and I was having trouble with it. Not surprising, after having so much trouble in the last couple of years with the writing…huge changes, huge challenges, and so much had been happening in my life to suck the muse right out of my head…(any of you who read my blog regularly are familiar with what I’m referring to). So I continued to struggle with this one…and then I realized what the problem was. Oddly, I was having trouble getting my MAIN characters in the book after the halfway point. Not a good sign. One of the subplots had started growing and I found that my main characters were being left out in favor of a couple of minor characters. So I thought, well maybe there’s another book heremaybe I’m trying to write two books. So I snatched out the plotline and characters from that portion and put it in a separate file and began to work on it–feeling like I was sort of “cheating” on my other characters by doing so. But it was pushing me to be written. Those characters were being insistent. They had a story to tell and they wanted me to tell it.

So. I was surprised about this new book. It wasn’t even on the docket.

SIDEBAR. I have been trying for years now to get all the other books written that are waiting in line. Some half-done, some just ideas. Like Quintessence, Somewhere Else, Curse of Madagascar, Another Justice, The Girls in the Band, and newer ones like, Hanging the Moon [with Kate Genet], Behind the Left: Authoring the Apocalypse, and a sequel to Resurrection Sticks –and those are just the fiction ones

This book, Syzygy, is also a concept-novel. A concept I came up with–not sure if anyone else ever came up with it too, but for me at least, it’s a new idea…it’s what I might call a spinoff-prequel. The new book sprang from the events and secondary characters of the original one. I started thinking about how interesting it would be to know more about those characters–like, what was happening in THEIR lives, that was just outside the purview of the plot in the book I was working on? What might that scene be like if it was written from the point of view of that other character? So then, an entirely new story evolved, but it was based on the original story in the AKA book. Only, it focused on those secondary characters, making them main characters, and then the main characters from the AKA book became the secondary characters in the new book. So here, I have a timeline of events, and in Syzygy, I’m telling the story of Ponzi Bonnet, Kenda Harper, Anna Dew, Garrison Bishop and Payne Hollister. And in AKA, I’m telling the story during the same timeline but through the characters of Jobeth, Phoebe, Izzy and Ginger. It almost means I need to write both of these books and release them at the same time, but that might be too maddening. So I think I will finish and release Syzygy first, since its timeline might be a little earlier, by about a week or two, than the AKA book. It would also give away less than the AKA book would, if I did that one first. I don’t want to have one book serving as a SPOILER for the other.

I feel like I’m rambling. I’m on first cup of coffee…NOTE TO SELF. Don’t ramble. anyway…

It’s a different sort of challenge, as it’s almost like writing a series, but slightly different…I have to think about what I write in Syzygy affecting what I’ll be writing in the 3rd AKA book. I have to make sure I don’t contradict things. Like I can’t have two different things happening to a character at the same time

(or can I?….. STOP IT.)

All of this has me thinking that there are all these other stories that can stem from stories I’ve written. The other perspectives. The other characters who play a minor role, but have an entire world of their own going on during those events. It’s also a way to create a thread of interest in readership–those who enjoy my books will find alternate stories that are peripheral to the ones they’ve already read. I find the whole concept fascinating. I hope a reader would, too. I have recently been concerned about my literary diversification–I do myself no favors by gaining a reader who then reads a certain genre of mine and realizes there aren’t any more of those yet, but that I jumped over and wrote nonfiction, or in some other genre…. (That’s another blog I wrote half of, but haven’t posted yet).

Jeez. I’m scattered.

Did I mention we’re moving 2 hours away in a week?

Yeah. got that nonfiction stuff to deal with too.

1 person likes this post.

Stranger Fiction, Reviews & Truthiness

Historically, there has been a notable chasm between the author’s craft and the reading public’s knowledge of what that craft includes.  And until recently, we never heard much from authors on a personal level about what they thought and felt, what their creative process was, what their methodology entailed. Nor could readers communicate with their favorite authors in any meaningful way.

Now, with the advent of Indie authoring and publishing, writers and readers may actually converse with each other. It might spoil the mystique of being a writer– that romantic idea of an angst-ridden wordsmith closed up in a candlelit room with coffee (or whiskey), manipulating a magical, torturous process that at some point produced viola!–a book. But I feel it’s a positive change. For the record, I love coffee, enjoy a glass of wine, am quite fond of candles, and do sometimes want to pull my hair out during the writing process. But I genuinely enjoy the open discussion about my books with readers who contact me via email, or during a bookclub meeting.

Unless an author is afflicted with narcissism, she will always carry a degree of insecurity about her writing. A book is, after all, a birthing of a literary child, and we feel that when we put it out into the world, we want it to do well, and never want anyone to speak an ill word against it.

I have been fortunate to have four and five star reviews most of the time, but the more I write, the more readers I get, the more I will come across the occasional comment or review which isn’t quite as complimentary. I’ve been lucky in that regard, as well, since the few negative comments I have received are within a context of the reader giving the book high marks overall.

I communicated recently with a reader who liked my book very much, but had a few points that bothered her. These complaints were, shall we say, not rooted in fact. I wrote back to her and explained in detail those things that bothered her, and I won’t include that exact text here, because it has far too many spoilers in it. But in general, I will mention a few points that readers have brought up.

One reader said of Book 2 in the AKA Investigation series, Also Known as DNA, “credit for the author for allowing the protaganist [sic] to get the snot kicked out of her on a few occasions and to make mistakes which gives her a more realistic feel.”

And then another who said, “skilled people, especially those 4 should not have been portrayed as that stupid and helpless.”

Opposite opinions about the same thing.

First, I have NEVER portrayed any of my characters as stupid or helpless, unless I was portraying them that way on purpose because they actually were stupid and helpless in the pejorative sense. My protagonists were only portrayed that way if they were stupid and helpless in the universal, unavoidable sense. I’ve known some truly intelligent people who did some patently stupid things–myself included. And I’ve known some really competent people who found themselves in a position of helplessness–myself included. There are myriad reasons why this will happen, no matter how learned, how wise, how strong, or how discerning you might be. Circumstances and emotions and outside forces can conspire to render you incapable–if only for a time–of doing anything to make it better. And these same elements can also prevent you from making the right choice. We all make mistakes, and I will not give my characters some heroic white-washing, when that’s not an accurate portrayal of how human beings are. Please and thank you. But in the context of fiction, obstacles allow the character to evolve. We learn about ourselves and others through adversity; and a good writer will do this with characters by showing how they might face these obstacles and conquer them.

Then there was another reader who really enjoyed the book, but said she was annoyed by a few plot issues. Like “There was no explanation to why [sic] the bike was run off the road by the person that [sic] did it. they wouldn’t have known each other at that point.”

There WAS an explanation, but it was in the subtext, and then actually explained in the dialogue between characters later. Once the full story came out, it was clear that what the main characters knew at first, was not what the villains knew. The antagonists had been involved the whole time and operating just out of the purview of the protagonists. When it finally came to light what had REALLY been happening, it was a matter of putting two and two together. The antagonists were working their plan around the protagonists long before the protagonists knew the antagonists even existed. So it might SEEM that the antagonists /protagonists couldn’t have “known” but that was intentional-viewpoint, meant to align the reader with the main characters, and NOT the villains. I wanted the reader to know only what the primary characters knew, so that when the truth was revealed, she would be just as surprised as those characters. It’s simply a literary device, nothing more.

This same reader also mentioned “the timeline for the day of the seminar doesn’t add up. too many things happened simultaneously to have all happened within the same day by [sic] the same people.”

I had to tell this reader, point by point, what happened in that day, to show her that it did, indeed, fit into the timeframe. I work everything out on a linear time chart and am very careful to make sure everything is possible, down to knowing how long it takes to do a particular thing, what time of day it is, and how long it takes a character to get from point A to Point B. It’s what I call Novel Logistics. This, then, was a perception on the part of the reader which was not accurate. It seemed as if that much couldn’t happen, but it’s also an intentional element of PACING. If you want the pacing to be fast, there has to be a lot happening in a short amount of time.

But the point here is, while I have made (and will continue to make) mistakes (and corrected the ones I’ve found or others have pointed out later), I care a great deal about my credibility. So it’s a bit aggravating for a writer to see that a reader will criticize something based on an impression that is rooted in their misunderstanding of what is happening, and how, and when. But there’s little an author can do about the ability of a reader to catch nuances and subtext, and even clear explanations that might come later.

Another issue from the above reader was “the confrontation with the enemy. the chasing, captures and recaptures and mountains, etc… was frustrating.” –this, when all other readers who commented, noted how much delicious tension and suspense this activity created for them. Like this reader, who wrote, “So many authors build up tension in their novels only to resolve everything in a matter of 15 pages. This is so frustrating and just plain lazy in my opinion. The last 15% of [Also Known as DNA] is wrought with tension and I was surprised and captivated the whole time” and another who said, “Nail-biting action and heart-stopping tension take the reader on a roller-coaster ride through the pages, piling one catastrophe on top of another and testing the characters to the limit. I wasn’t sure they’d all make it out alive in this one, but it sure had me turning the pages to find out.”

So–it’s all very subjective, isn’t it?

My partner Kate astutely pointed out, “This is why you shouldn’t read reviews.” I’m not certain she meant you in the universal sense or you in the sense of ME, personally, but probably good advice, overall. Be that as it may, reviews are a way for me to see what’s working in my writing, and what’s not, regardless of how many readers might also not catch the subtext, or might not enjoy being pulled through too many challenges with the characters, or might not have an accurate assessment of a timeline.

One reader said that the beginning of Armchair Detective had implausible parts in the plot regarding how Jobeth was hired as an unlicensed P.I., but what that reader didn’t know was that it was all true, based on my own personal history. My experience as an amateur sleuth some years ago, was what inspired the story in the first place. Everything I write is either from personal experience or that of another’s, or if it’s completely fabricated, I consult with authorities on the matter to ensure that it is plausible and credible. This is why when I write about medical things, I speak to nurses and doctors, and when I write of legal things I talk to attorneys, and when I write of police matters, I speak to police officers. There is no greater resource for a character’s job, than those who do the job every day.

Ultimately, what all this tells me is:

First, an opinion isn’t always a fact.
Second, you can’t please everyone.
And third, and most importantly, (and with the most paradoxical irony), this concept: I may have failed to do the best job on a book, if I didn’t make the fiction seem like truth, even if the truth seemed like fiction.

Truth is, as the adage goes, stranger than fiction, and thus, when it appears, it is perceived as lacking credibility, even though FICTION is, by definition, NOT TRUE. So there will always be readers who lament the lack of credibility in some aspect of fiction, when many times the depiction is accurate, it just doesn’t SEEM accurate. So therefore, we, as fiction writers have to be careful to be credible and realistic, while lying our collective asses off. Are you following this?

(Where is my medication?)

Be the first to like.

The Handmaid’s Tale: An American Dream Gone Awry

Throughout our recent election process, I kept thinking about how a Romney presidency would begin to remind me of The Handmaid’s Tale, the dystopian novel by Margaret Atwood. It reminded me that I wrote a paper on this book years ago in college. I don’t seem to have it compiled in any of my published anthologies, so i thought i would post it here. It’s a timely piece of literature still, which does not speak well of our republic. The Tea-Party is just the sort of organization to bring this dystopian theocracy to fruition. Hopefully those things are back on the road to change, now that we have 4 more years with Obama.

 

The Handmaid’s Tale

 An American Dream Gone Awry

Kelli Jae Baeli
(c)1990

In today’s futuristic literature, one can find the foreshadowing of tomorrow’s issues splattered upon today’s newspapers.

Margaret Atwood’s  The Handmaid’s Tale is a haunting portrayal of the American Dream gone awry.  In the pages of this ominous novel, one finds echoes of a past not unlike our present, and a future twisted by the repercussions of religious zeal and environmental devastation. Many of the horrors reflected by the handmaid who narrates represent the agenda of issues touted by feminists: sexism, pollution, Christian-Fundamentalism’s dangerous inclinations, and racism.

The Handmaid’s Tale is a chilling look at a futuristic society wherein the government rules through oppression, deprivation, and threat of execution.  Atwood’s vision is at once frightening and credible, illustrating a scenario that demands attention and consideration from all–whether they believe in the power of the American Dream, or not.

The Handmaid’s Tale uses the Republic of Gilead as its setting, and the themes of the American Dream are played out upon this stage; the players easily represent the crude underbelly of current-day society and its victims.  Christian- Fundamentalists, after a coop which results in the machine-gun execution of Congress and the President, usurp the freedoms which Americans once enjoyed. Reading has been outlawed; personal property is now a thing of the past; all liberties are taken from the citizens of Gilead, so that it is reduced to a tyrannical theocracy.  This is Atwood’s fictional rendition of the New World.

The Christian-Fundamentalist government in The Handmaid’s Tale has taken as its basic tenets the teachings of the Old Testament and interprets all scripture in a literal sense.  This includes the procreation process as depicted in the  book of Genesis wherein Rachel offers Jacob her maid, Bilhah, as a surrogate when Rachel

is unable to conceive.  In Atwood’s Gilead, this surrogate motherhood is a must; a ghastly combination of pollution and environmental apathy has left many women sterile.  With the extinction of the human race so threatened, the conception of

children is assigned to the those women with “viable ovaries.” A monthly ceremony is acted out by each Commander, his barren wife, and the fertile handmaid.  Restricted to clinical, procreative purposes only, the Commander inseminates the handmaid assigned to him while the Wife holds the handmaid between her legs in a ritualistic manner.

The Old Testament’s influence is further reflected in the names of shops which deal in goods and produce.  The handmaid is sent with a token card representing the items her household wishes to obtain (all paper money has been banned), and she makes her purchases from shops such as  “All Flesh,” “Loaves and Fishes,” “Lilies of the Field,” and “Daily Bread.”  On her trip to the marketplace, she walks with another handmaid, each of them exchanging puritan-like greetings: “Blessed be the fruit” and “May the Lord open.” Every detail in the Republic of Gilead is arranged as a continual reminder of the religious dogma upon which their very existence depends.

Although Gilead is patriarchal in structure, women are at the center of its operation.  The women of Gilead are merely a sad facsimile of the future-woman that today’s feminists wish for. The axiom, “Be careful what you wish for–you just might get it” seems to apply here.  In Gilead, women are respected only for their role in the Republic, and considering the strong role females play, it is not surprising that the crime of rape is punished by placing the offender amid a crowd of handmaids, who proceed to beat, kick, scratch, and bludgeon him to death.  This ritual

serves as a deterrent to those who would disrupt the valuable procreative process and also recruits in the handmaids a sacredness toward their reproductive duties; this component perpetuates the masterplan of the government.

Within the general understanding of the American Dream, there is also a respect for reason, and though the crime of rape is no less reprehensible than in the Gileadean era, the perpetrator is at least entitled to due process, and vengeance is considered contrary to the true nature of justice.  Likewise, reason is ignored by the Republic in its view of friendship as another threat to the government;  the distortion of reason is also represented by the perception that freedom of the individual to act out that individuality is strictly insidious.

Progress is achieved in Gilead through a stringent, imperious process of cultural distinction.  Classes and races of people are judged and punished according to literal Biblical teachings, as well: The “Children of Ham” are relocated, Jews are sent back to Israel, and undesireables, et al  (Catholics, homosexuals, Quakers, abortionists, etc.) are sent to “the Colonies.”  Handmaids who fail to perform satisfactorily are also doomed to the Colonies wherein the inmates dispose of deadly pollutants and subsequently die slowly of chemical poisoning.

Depending on the severity of the crime, undesirables can also look forward to public execution, their bodies hung on hooks along the wall around the city in a macabre display of power.

The “work-ethic” ingredient of the American Dream is overturned in The Handmaid’s Tale.  Duties and positions in the society are assigned according to each person’s usefulness to the general philosophy of Gilead.  Fertile women  become handmaids; affluent women become Wives; older, able-bodied women become Marthas (domestic servants), and some become Aunts– sort of the Drill Sergeants in charge of other women. Men are either Commanders or servants or valuable professionals.  Accordingly, the element of marriage and family in the American Dream is regressed to a pre-Christ patriarchy that avoids all semblance of individual freedom.  Thus, the family unit, which is a staple of the American Dream, is warped into some cruel mockery of the freedoms once enjoyed by American citizens.

There are, as one might expect, rebel factions at work in the underground of this hellish kingdom who hold dear the Old World in The Handmaid’s Tale.  These Old World values are familiar and alarming to the reader because it is the world in which the reader lives; Atwood incarnates this New World by momentarily suspending the reader’s disbelief, and this tale suddenly becomes plausible. Gilead is entangled with the infamous Armageddon outside the walls of the city, and the struggle for restoration of the Old World continues despite the government’s attempts to conquer it.  Perhaps this illustrates the spirit of the American Dream–patriotism.  These rebel forces operate with the knowledge that if one of its members is caught, he or she will most assuredly pay the price with his or her own life.  Yet, life to them is meaningless unless they have some say in how they live it, and thus, the mentality of New World versus Old World is brought boldly to life.

If the American Dream is a vision of utopia, then The Handmaid’s Tale is most certainly a dystopia, as it contains a plethora of details regarding the oppressive existence of an imprisoned people, once free.  Atwood paints an ugly portrait of a future society starved for a new Eden, with its land of plenty.  The “plenty” offered in the Republic of Gilead, however, is plenty of oppression.

In The Handmaid’s Tale the pursuit of the American Dream is counter- productive.  Gilead is the result of fanatics who sought to create the perfect society, yet manage to create a living hell. They are blinded by the pursuit of the dream itself and have, in the process, lost large segments of their own humanity. Unfortunately, Americans have become entrenched in the liberties that freedom gives them, and thus, many freedoms are taken for granted.  This considered, it is easy to see how the American Dream may seem a myth to some in today’s society.  But if all the basic ingredients afforded within that myth were taken away, it might be seen through contrast that the myth is perhaps an exaggeration of an underlying truth.

Be the first to like.

Streaming & Quilting: Differing Methodologies in Novelwriting

My partner, Kate,  and I often discuss methodology in our writing. While in general we are very much alike, personally, we do have two completely different methods for writing a book.

Kate has this uncanny, subconscious method that seems to flow from her Muse and out onto the page, with herself as conduit. It seems amazing to me that she can start at the beginning (the beginning!?) and write straight through until the book is done. A linear stream of subconsciousness. No major tweaking of plot points or planting of red herrings {1}, rarely any insertion of missing foreshadowing or details that have to change since something else happened later… When she was working on Building Character, I was amazed to see elements reappear and figure so prominently into the events, when they were hinted at in the beginning, without her even knowing why that particle was in the text she was writing. It’s a little eerie that she seems to have a complete prescience of the story before she’s consciously aware of it, or even writes it. I find that truly amazing.

She is quick to say, however, that she is mindful the whole way through of style and technique and diction and story arcs, etc. The point is, she writes a book from beginning to end, letting it all freeflow, and somehow it comes out brilliantly rendered on the other side. I don’t know how she does that.

And she says she doesn’t know how I do what I do.

I am a more technical writer in my method. My modus operandi is analogous to making a quilt.

I start with one patch of fabric (a character, a scene, a bit of dialogue) and I attach other patches to it, repeatedly, until it becomes one whole cloth.{2}

In my previous AKA Investigations book 2, Also Known as DNA, it began with dialogue. I must have written 100 pages of dialogue before writing much else on that one. I suspect it was a way to allow the characters to tell me the story, since I was already familiar with them and they were more likely to ‘communicate openly with me’–and apparently that method was useful, because it was the quickest I’d ever written a novel (4 months).

Anyway, as I’m piecing together all these parts, I’m looking for the common thread, the repeating theme, the Happy Accidents (elements that appear unplanned, but seem to magically fit into the story). I have this pervasive belief that all things are connected in some way, and it’s my task, in writing a novel, Also Known as DNAto find those connections and hook them up in a way that is credible, and hopefully clever and entertaining as well. That’s half the fun of writing for me: discovering how all those disparate elements can possibly be connected.

In Also Known as DNA, for instance, I noticed the theme of family–those related to you biologically–and parenting, and how everyone can react so differently to what they experience from their parents. So, DNA was the thread. In the 3rd AKA Investigations book, which I am working on now, I have yet to find that common theme. I’m still putting the patches together. I have all these scenes and some of them don’t seem to belong in the same book. But I’ve done this enough times to know that it’s exactly how to create the story for me. I want to find those connections between things that don’t seem to be connected at first blush.

It’s FUN. And writing should be fun at least part of the time.

===================================

{1} have you ever tried to plant a red herring? They’re so wiggly, and won’t stay in the dirt.

{2} I know this metaphor could go much deeper, but I’d need to learn more about quilting to render it well.  Random Thought Alert: I don’t even LIKE quilts. I mean, I like them, conceptually, but because of my SPS, they just seem too chaotic and tend to stress me out. Too many disparate elements crammed together–I like solid colors. I won’t even buy striped towels. But this echoes my need to link and make sense of the disparate elements in the book I’m writing and forge it into a cohesive whole. I NEED to make order from chaos.

Be the first to like.

Springboarding

Most often, we write from what we know. We write from a place of experience and sensation, because that’s part of who we are, and so it must show up on the page in some way. But I recognize the danger in putting so much of myself into my characters…it could just become some glorified masturbation. Yet, a bit of literary self-cloning is inevitable and unavoidable. I did it today–put myself into some characters…and then I realized it’s a very effective means of getting the story written.

Partially, my initial process involves research, as I tend to be a more technical writer in the beginning stages until things take off and then the creative part floods in and fills it all out.  By research, I don’t mean tedious outlines or character sketches and full biographies of everyone in the story. I mean what I call Novel Logistics. I mean I write whatever strikes my fancy, and then I come across an unknown, and look it up, find out more about it. In that information will often be a seed for something else- For moving the story, creating an authentic setting, solving a plot problem or deepening the character.

For instance, today I was working on a scene with a character where I needed her to stall a conversation, and I looked down at my boots and thought about it, and then I thought maybe she would also look at her boots, think about them instead of the conversation, and then that led me to giving her my boots. So I had to Google them to find the name or style so I could describe them accurately, and I found a picture of another pair of boots, similar, but not quite the same. The boot style was called Fierce. I thought this character would be thinking about buying those boots partly because of the name–because she wanted to be fierce. And these were the first nice boots she had ever been able to buy for herself. And that tied nicely into the subject of the conversation she was trying to avoid. And thus, what were once my boots, became her boots, but then they weren’t the same boots at all. Just a springboard into something more.

In a different scene with another character, I used a certain idea about mediocrity, and it began to represent itself in the color grey. Then i found all these connections that fit into the story, developed both characters, and moved the plot a few steps forward. (Rough draft, but here’s that passage):

 Dr. Garrison Bonnet lived a mundane life. In toto, there was no way to make investigations more interesting when you were tailing a guy who liked to read and drink tea and feed ducks. The most interesting thing about him was the odd theme emerging. Grey. Dr. Bonnet had a pattern of grey in his life, and it was, as metaphors go, a fitting color. She wondered if he noticed the pattern of it in his life.

She had followed him from his office to the park where he perused a copy of Fifty Shades of Grey, a book she tried to read because of the hype, but found the writing on the amateur side, even though the concept was intriguing. Ultimately she was too aggravated by the book’s obvious need for an editor, and dismissed it as a waste of time. She failed to understand the allure of it for so many women. Perhaps because it was aimed at straight women, and she was most notably not in that category.

Bonnet also sipped from his Starbucks cup of (no kidding) Earl Grey tea, and tossed stale bread crumbs to the (still not kidding) grey Gadwells that waddled up from the lake.

He was also wearing a grey jacket. Perhaps his damn underwear was grey too. So what she discovered about him, aside from his abject mediocrity, was that his stature seemed a fictional construct, perhaps perpetuated by the prestige of being a high-dollar psychiatrist who often worked for the police department, who lived in an upscale house on an upscale street in an upscale neighborhood, and drove a decidedly upscale vehicle—a Mercedes Benz C250—in an upscale shade of—ferfucksake—grey. It had to be intentional. Grey had to simply be his favorite color and maybe he levitated toward all things of that shade. Or maybe he had his own quirks and obsessions. Physician, heal thyself.

 I often do that. I use my own thoughts and settings and products and preferences and habits and then as the characters evolve, those things do also, and they get refined and become part of that character in a different way, and eventually it’s not myself in the character, but the character’s self. It’s very much like taking a lump of clay and plopping it on the pottery wheel. I am the clay I put there and then when the wheel spins and I start drawing my hands u p the sides, it becomes something completely new. Even though that clay came from me–WAS me. This method allows me to springboard from a familiar place into a new place of creation–of fiction. And yet on some level it is not fiction at all, just a version of something that was  true. And I believe the most effective fiction is a reflection of truth.

Be the first to like.

Resurrection Sticks -Book Trailer

my novella, Resurrection Sticks

Be the first to like.

Baggage – Book Trailer

My mainstream book, Baggage.

Be the first to like.

Achilles Forjan review: “particularly engrossing”

 of 1 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Another Great Book From Baeli! August 29, 2012
Format:Paperback|Amazon Verified Purchase

I love this author! Ms. Baeli has quickly become one of my “must read” authors.

This novel is particularly engrossing with its somewhat detached and esoteric mood. I think the way the author describes the inner life of the main character, Amy, really lent itself to creating an almost haunted tone.

Bless her heart; Amy is a tender soul who lacks the ability to shrug off the emotional effects that present themselves in her profession as a paramedic. Over a very short amount of time she becomes witness to senseless acts of violence and neglect and she realizes her lack of power over the outcomes of these situations. Her ensuing depression and despondency seem very authentic and what I really admire is that the author in no way portrays this character as a whiny victim.

The story kicks into high gear when Amy’s sleep disorder begins to color the events of the narrative. Are we seeing dreams, post-cognitive visions or memories? I was continually kept guessing right up to the end. The end and the resolution of the plot were a bit sudden for me, but the epilogue more than made up for it.

This book was a wonderful read.

======================================
Achilles Forjan is available in digital and

print formats from  Amazon,
Smashwords,and author’s website

Be the first to like.

As You Were: “well written and highly enjoyable romance, mystery and intrigue, with a light touch of humor”

Review

As You Were by Kelli Jae Baeli

Singer/songwriter Tru Morgan is totally in love with her live in girl friend Brittany (Brit) Jabot. Together they share a wonderful home on Red Mountain, Colorado. Their lives are idyllic, filled with their dreams, romantic nights and  riding their beloved horses in a fairy tale, snowy setting. Life just couldn’t get much better for them……. Until one day, a malicious chain of events ends up being the indirect cause cause of a tragic accident.

Tru finds herself fighting to find the life she once had with Brit. This in itself is an uphill struggle, but add to it disruptive outside influences and it is going to be almost an impossibility. Some people just do not want to see Tru and Brit back together.

The question that has to be asked is…. Will Tru and Brit ever find their way back to the love so callously torn from them?

A well written and highly enjoyable romance, mystery and intrigue, with a light touch of humor. Although this story is basically a romance, there is so much more packed into it. So many twists and turns and ups and downs, it’s a real rollercoaster ride of highs and lows. I simply couldn’t put this book down and couldn’t turn the pages fast enough. I had to force myself to slow down. I wouldn’t advise starting this late at night, unless you don’t need to sleep.

***

The two main characters, Tru and Brit are poles apart throughout most of the book. I don’t want to put in any spoilers, but the emotional ride they are on, is hard going for them. The only thing I will say is, I wasn’t disappointed with the outcome of the story.

All the characters in the book were well formed and they each played their parts in progressing the story forward. The scenic descriptions made it easy to visualize being amongst the characters while the story evolves.

One thing I particularly liked about this book is the way we saw how Tru and Brit got together in the first instance in flashbacks. I do like to know the background of the characters.

This is the first book I’ve read by this author, now that I’ve found her, I’ll definitely be buying more.

 

=================
As You Were is available at

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Be the first to like.

Book Trailer for Also Known as DNA

 

Be the first to like.

New Book Trailer for Armchair Detective

Finally got around to making a book trailer. This was first one.  Will post the others after this.

1 person likes this post.

Switch to our mobile site