Archive for the ‘SCIENCE’ Category

Reading, Muses, Curses & the Pick-A-Project-Polka.

 

Since completing the third and fourth books (simultaneously) of the AKA Investigations series, I am doing that Writers-blockPick-A-Project-Polka; a dance we writers do when we’re trying to decide what we feel like working on next; we listen to our muse, we dance with our muse, we kick our muse out and get practical, and we sometimes curse our muse and send it to bed without dinner. All of these I’ve done this time around, as well.

Fortunately, I seem to have spent enough time on a particular draft to safely assume it’s the one I will be finishing next. I have always had a collection of half-written books that one day I intend to finish (Quintessence, Somewhere Else, and Another Justice, to name a few). Most writers can probably say that. But the interesting thing is being faced with tangible examples of how far you’ve come as a writer. Stories I recalled as really good, needing to be finished because of their value, I now look at, and consider them lining for a birdcage.

Take the one I’m rewriting, now….it started out years ago as The Curse of Madagascar. Then the TV series, Lost, began to air and I was afraid I’d be accused of plagiarism to some degree, if I tried to publish that story, even though I had written it years before the TV series came about.  The book was about a straight couple, newlyweds, who are on their way to Saint-Denis, in Africa for their honeymoon, and instead get stranded on a tropical island (Madagascar, though they don’t know where they are) after their transport boat sinks. They battle a shark, then get on shore with nothing, and struggle to survive in an environment that is filled with strange creatures, is unfriendly and mysterious, and soon discover there is something sinister going on, and their lives are in danger, because there are some villainous men who are using the island for….er…um…

Here is where the story fizzled (Honestly, it fizzled from the get-go, but for the sake of explanation–) I needed to pinpoint what the “curse” in the title referred to….

Originally, it was in third person omniscient, then I changed it to third person limited. Originally, it was also set in Africa, but then I decided I didn’t want to spend the research time necessary to write anything about a setting I knew little about, and opted instead to change the setting to Cache La Poudre, a wilderness area in Northern Colorado. I am familiar with my home state. Also, at different times it was about drugs, human trafficking, and I even considered something supernatural, likecatfacekeyboard the island was a living entity somehow, and perhaps it was a sort of purgatory, and my characters were already dead, but in some alternate reality after death (See? Very similar to Lost). It hardly mattered what my story was about, though, because the whole shebang was a cheese-fest. Dialogue smarmy and uber-romanticized, like something out of a bad Harlequin (not to suggest there was ever a GOOD Harlequin). But I noticed all the stereotyping I was doing, with gender-roles. I, of course, had to have the man save the woman, and she was, of course, weak and frightened and only able to feel safe while in his arms. Repugnant, all around.

[finger in my throat, and a retching noise].

So then, in the spirit of focusing my writing endeavors on the one genre (lesbian), and more importantly, in the spirit of putting my name only on stories I’m not ashamed of, I decided to rewrite what I already had on this story and finish it.

One rewrite focus area, as mentioned, was the dialogue–cheese-be-gone….another was the sentence structure. Too same-same, too often. Then I ran into that whole stylistic quagmire of having two females in almost every repeatkeyscene and getting tired of using “she” and “her” so having to fix that with sentence structure, and stylistic tricks. Another was beginning paragraphs and sentences with the same word repeatedly, over and over, again and again, until it became a repetitious, recapitulation, reiteration, replay, reproduction, rerun, reshowing and also a duplication.  Amazing, the little lessons we learn about our craft that we hardly notice until being faced with them in the form of our own literary apparitions, ghost stories from the past. My muse was quite wispy and frail back then. Largely attributable to my early years of reading too many of the aforementioned romance novels, and also watching too many soap operas. I learned how to write poorly from both (these sorts of things also have a way of retarding your intellect, as well). My writing only improved when I began to read more accomplished, masterful authors. Like Edgar Allen Poe, Edgar Rice Burroughs, Robert A. Heinlein and later, Dean Koontz (in whom I have lost interest in recent years, perhaps because his writing has become a little tedious–though I did learn a great deal by studying his writing, to find out what he was doing to get me to turn that page every time).

In fact, most of my reading experiences have been about finding a set of authors I could follow; but they were few and far between, and so I read widely in many genres, and ultimately discarded most of them after reading only one of their books.  It takes quite a lot to get me to turn a page, and if it’s not a strong enough pull, I will lay that book down and move on. I’ve always felt that there were not enough years in my life to read everything I want to read, so I am loath to read anything that isn’t a valuable use of my time. I can see how all of these experiences have shaped me as a writer.

I’ve always enjoyed the Maximum Ride series by James Patterson, even though I don’t usually read in the Youngplumisland_DeMille Adult genre. I found those books hugely entertaining and delightful and quick-reading, which was what I wanted at the time. And more recently, I enjoyed Gone Girl, by Gillian Flynn, but was disappointed in the cop-out ending–a particularly potent peeve of mine. And I have only a few days ago, discovered Nelson DeMille, and he’s shaping up to be a favorite, if this book, Plum Island, continues to be as good as it has been from page-one. I’m excited about this possibility, since I see the stacks and stacks of books he has just waiting for my hungry eyes to explore.

Over the last ten years or so, I’ve read far more nonfiction than fiction. I read many books by authors like Christopher Hitchens, Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins, Carl Sagan, George Smith, Stephen Hawking, and other authors in the science and atheism category, as well as a plethora of social psychology. It seemed to influence me to write nonfiction, which is why I strayed from the market and over-diversified myself into lower royalties.

But I was in a self-imposed curriculum, my own university, and the studies I did in religion, alone, would have garnered me a degree, if I had been doing it in an actual collegiate setting–perhaps a master’s thesis equivalent, in the three years it took me to write my 6-volume magnum opus, Supernatural Hypocrisy: The Cognitive Dissonance of a God Cosmology.  Additionally, I published a book of poetry (Yin & Yang: Poetry from Both Sides of my Disposition), a memoir (Falling through the Cracks: This Misadventures of No One Famous) compiled all my essays into volumes, (Like Too Much World, and Wear a Helmet, and Bettered by a Dead Crustacean) and even a volume of essays about writing in Don’t Fall in Love With Your Words (Fall in Love With Your Craft). I wrote a few nonfiction books for lesbians,  like ISO (In Search Of): The Art of Dating, Relationships & Sex for the Discerning Lesbian and Sullied Pajamas: A Discerning Lesbian on Dating, Relationships & Sex.

Throughout all this abandonment to the whims of my muse, I learned a great deal about the craft of writing and of the discipline of publishing and editing, but I was not being wise about the market. I said I didn’t care about that, I made enough money writing what I wanted to write, with no regard for what was popular. But then the royalties crashed when the ebook market opened up and my print books stopped selling while my electronic versions increased instead; but I was now competing with a whole horde of Indie authors, the successful ones of whom were writing series fiction and sticking to one genre. I had, as I said, diversified myself right out of a paycheck. And I was getting really fond of that extra money. Hopefully my rededication to one genre, and focus on series, will get me back on track.

Sales are surprisingly good for my two new ones Also Known as Syzygy and Also Known as Rising and Falling, which are numbers 3 and 4 on the AKA Investigations series. This tells me that there were readers out there justfingerscrossedkeyboard_324 waiting for me to continue that series. And I will continue to do that, while developing other series in the subgenres of lesbian fiction, and making most of them novellas since the trend seems to be shorter books, now. I guess people don’t have or make much time to read these days. Until then, I must keep my focus, and not stray into territory that I can’t occupy in a formidable way, and hope to gain an appreciable piece of the literary pie in that fashion.

Fingers crossed, when not typing.

 

Be the first to like.

No More Hall-Decking for You Guys

Excerpt from Supernatural Hypocrisy: The Cognitive Dissonance of a God Cosmology

by

Kelli Jae Baeli

 

Available now in ebook formats-CLICK COVER“Twelve Jews were brutally murdered, huge numbers maimed, and many Jewish women were raped. Two million rubles worth  of property was destroyed.” ~ Lawrence Kelleman

 

Isn’t Christmas a wonderful time of year?

Consider this:

Thus says the LORD, Do not learn the way of the nations, And do not be terrified by the signs of the Heavens, although the nations are terrified by them; For the customs of the peoples are delusion; Because it is wood cut from the forest, The work of the hands of a craftsman with a cutting tool. They decorate it with silver and with gold; They fasten it with nails and with hammers So that it will not totter” (Jeremiah 10:2-4).

Okay, that’s it for all you Christmas-tree-hugging Christians. If you believe in what the Bible tells you, there will be no more Christmas trees or decorating!

Thou mustest not decketh the halls!

And lest you think the tree is the only borrowed symbol or tradition practiced by the God-fearing, allow me to shed a little light in a dark place.

In ancient Babylon, the date of December 25th was a celebration in honor of the son of Isis, the Goddess of Nature.

In Rome, long before the birth of Christ, the Winter Solstice day of Saturnalia was celebrated in honor of Saturn, the god of agriculture. The Mummers, who went house to house, singing and dancing, sprang from this celebration, and from it, the tradition of caroling.

Northern Europeans celebrated Yule, on Winter Solstice, the shortest day of the year, in honor of the birth of the sun god, Mithra. Kissing under the mistletoe began there, as a fertility ritual. Evergreen trees were brought indoors to remind them of the coming harvest.

Even the Druids had a ritual around a tree.

Since pagan Romans were in the majority in the year 350, Pope Julius I declared that the birth of Christ would be celebrated on December 25th, so as not to alienate them, and in hopes that they would convert to Christianity a bit more easily if they could keep the date of their feasts. The ritual of gift-giving began in Rome, as well:

In pre-Christian Rome, the emperors compelled their most despised citizens to bring offerings and gifts during the Saturnalia (in December) and Kalends (in January).  Later, this ritual expanded to include gift-giving among the general populace.  The Catholic Church gave this custom a Christian flavor by re-rooting it in the supposed gift-giving of Saint Nicholas (Miles).

The history of Saint Nicolas began in Turkey, where Nicolas was a bishop who convened the Council of Nicaea in 325 CE. After his death December 6, 345 CE, he was idolized, and eventually became the central figure when his bones were moved to Italy, and he replaced Pasqua Epiphania, “The Grandmother,” who used to put gifts for children in stockings. When The Grandmother was ousted, Nicolas became the focus of gift-giving. This cult made its way to Germany, where Nicolas was merged with the god Woden, and the white beard, winter clothing and his travel on a flying horse became the norm.

In a quest for adherents, the Catholic church adopted the Nicolas figure, and encouraged the pagans to exchange gifts on December 25th, rather than on the 6th. He soon became known by the Dutch version of his name, Santa Claus. The rest is just the natural progression of time and tradition.

Christmas, then, is not a history of Christian celebration of the birth of Christ. It is more accurately a time when Jews were tortured and murdered, and a modified incarnation of the most reprehensible pagan rituals ever known. Here’s why:

The pagans of Rome would force one community member to partake in debauchery and gluttony, and then when the festival ended on December 25th, they would destroy the dark forces by killing him.

Some of the most depraved customs of the Saturnalia carnival were intentionally revived by the Catholic Church in 1466 when Pope Paul II, for the amusement of his Roman citizens, forced Jews to race naked through the streets of the city.  An eyewitness account reports, “Before they were to run, the Jews were richly fed, so as to make the race more difficult for them and at the same time more amusing for spectators. They ran… amid Rome’s taunting shrieks and peals of laughter, while the Holy Father stood upon a richly ornamented balcony and laughed heartily (Kertzer).

In Warsaw, on December 25, 1881,

Twelve Jews were brutally murdered, huge numbers maimed, and many Jewish women were raped. Two million rubles worth of property was destroyed (Kelleman).

Julius Streicher, a particularly depraved assistant to Hitler, wrote a Christmas editorial to Der Stuermer, an Anti-Semitic newspaper. In it, he said,

If one really wants to put an end to the continued prospering of this curse from Heaven that is the Jewish blood, there is only one way to do it: to eradicate this people, this Satan’s son, root and branch.

Merry Christmas, everyone.

And that’s not the only thing that Christians don’t understand about their own beliefs. Many common themes and terminology don’t stem from the actual scriptures.

Dan Barker, an ex-Christian minister and author of many essays and several books, including, Losing Faith in Faith: From Preacher to Atheist, confronts this.

The next time believers tell you that “separation of church and state” does not appear in our founding document, tell them to stop using the word “trinity.” The word “trinity” appears nowhere in the Bible. Neither does Rapture, or Second Coming, or Original Sin. If they are still unfazed (or unphrased) by this, then add Omniscience, Omnipresence, Supernatural, Transcendence, Afterlife, Deity, Divinity, Theology, Monotheism, Missionary, Immaculate Conception, Christmas, Christianity, Evangelical, Fundamentalist, Methodist, Catholic, Pope, Cardinal, Catechism, Purgatory, Penance, Transubstantiation, Excommunication, Dogma, Chastity, Unpardonable Sin, Infallibility, Inerrancy, Incarnation, Epiphany, Sermon, Eucharist, the Lord’s Prayer, Good Friday, Doubting Thomas, Advent, Sunday School, Dead Sea, Golden Rule, Moral, Morality, Ethics, Patriotism, Education, Atheism, Apostasy, Conservative (Liberal is in), Capital Punishment, Monogamy, Abortion, Pornography, Homosexual, Lesbian, Fairness, Logic, Republic, Democracy, Capitalism, Funeral, Decalogue, or Bible.

 

1 person likes this post.

Cosmic Giggle

It’s been a busy and eventful few months. The biggest news I have mentioned, but it only gets better. Against all odds, against all logic, I have managed to meet the woman of my dreams. She is from New Zealand (who knew that my soulmate would be hiding on the opposite side of the world? Kind of a cosmic giggle, there, though I would prefer she had been nearby when this started. Like in the same country).

But be that as it may, the more time we spend getting to know each other, the more we see this magical kindredness; this inexplicable bond that can only come from two people who are meant to be together. We have many challenges ahead, but we are both sickeningly happy about the whole thing.

She is, like me, an author, and this is how we initially crossed paths. She wrote a review on one of my books and I wrote to thank her, and we exchanged some communications, and then eventually, she send just the right email, said all the right things, and a set of possibilities was born.

Now, we have become so close, so connected. I have never felt so understood, so appreciated, so adored and so loved. We are the very cliche of a whirlwind romance, and of two people who have fallen hopelessly, irretrievable in love. We have all the usual symptoms: constant, obsessive thoughts about each other, a constant need to be together (like Velcro), physical reactions to each other that are powerful even when we are not in the same room–a mere photograph or thought can engender the same response as if we were touching.  I miss her MADLY right now. She is currently at her home in New Zealand working on that book, and will be back here in July for a while.

How did I manage to get so lucky? She is intelligent, funny, witty, genuine, sincere, ethical, sensitive, creative…and it is icing on the cake that she is also incredibly beautiful. She is feminine, just quirky enough to delight me, and I have to say that the New Zealand accent is sexy as hell. (Think Lucy Lawless/Xena). She is not just some things on my list of the Ultimate Partner, but ALL THINGS on that list. I can scarcely believe my good fortune, after a life of cursing the luck fairies. Perhaps there really is some force in the universe that evens things out. My only regret is that we didn’t meet earlier. Even one complete lifetime with her would not be enough.

As many of my readers know, in the last year I have been suffering, for the first time, with writer’s block. My last two relationships sucked the creative life-force out of me somehow.  And that was capped off with betrayal and abandonment by my best friend, when I needed her the most. I still don’t understand how any of that made sense to her, but I had to find a way to move on, as painful as it was. I had not succeeded in doing that, and was circling the drain when Kate appeared. She managed to spark my creativity again, give me back those things that make my life worth living: Hope, Love, and Purpose. I knew that if I went much longer without them, I would likely not survive. So in a very real way, she has saved my life. And she has given me so much more than that. More than I ever dreamed possible. I am so proud to call her mine. She is my soulmate.

Another perk that I would have considered a scary specter, is that I am going to New Zealand at the end of the year, and will likely move there for awhile, where she has a house. I have always been fearful of getting on a plane, even more so of going out of the country. But I would board a hundred planes to be with her everyday. We will be getting married there (where it’s LEGAL), and after things are wrapped up there, we plan to return to Colorado and get a house in the mountains.

All very romantic and idyllic, and the stuff of dreams. But this is no dream. It is very real, and we both feel that we are in each others’ marrow. It’s as if we have known each other through several lifetimes, and have been searching for each other. The placard above the Door of my Life used to read, Abandon all hope, ye who enter here. Now it says Dreams really do come true. I have never felt a connection like this in my life. I adore her with every cell in my body. I finally know what it is to be truly happy….24/7. I have never felt joy like this. It has colored every other thing in my life and made it so beautiful.

Another thrilling aspect of this scenario, is that we both share the same passions–the strongest of which is the writing. We will be forming a Indie publishing business to handle all our books, soon, and are looking forward to that process.

We are also writing a book together, as well (Hanging the Moon–one that we think will be a series)…the process of which will begin in earnest after she finishes her current project, called Building Character. I managed to come up with the title for it, and she came up with a brilliant cover idea, which I rendered in anticipation of the project completion. The book is in first draft, but already, it is brilliant, and I feel it will do really well when we get it out in both print and digital form.

So, having moved to a new apartment for another year here, I will then be moving to another country–to be with my Kiwi girl, the love of my life. And the future is not just bright, but blinding–somewhat like a quasar.

Be the first to like.

Fish Should Learn to Walk

I think I’ve moved past my most recent dark night of the soul. This time it took about 7 weeks.

Had a couple of things go my way, though, (finding a new apartment to move to, which I love), and an online relationship deepening into intriguing and exciting possibilities….possibilities that become pissabilities…As is the trend with my life, I don’t get anything good without an addendum of aggravation or disappointment. Some reminder that no, fortune does not often smile on me and the Luck Fairies either have a millennium-old vendetta against my soul, have no GPS, or are somewhat retarded.

I have found some hope and solace and titillation from a wonderful woman. Yes, she’s online. And yes, she’s very far away, but I’m just trying to be a little open to pissabilities becoming possibilities, since she seems such a good match and I am wildly attracted to her. She is intelligent, witty, sensitive, absolutely stunning, also a very voluminous and gifted writer, has a sultry, calming voice, and foreign accent ( I heard it in a podcast where she talked about and read an excerpt from one of her books)… And she has used that delicious voice to say all the right things to me. MMmmm. Hard to resist that tempting package. It’s like The Official Bait for Jae Baeli.

It is now getting to that frustration-stage, though, which is normally avoided by actually going on a date or two. We are, by wretched geography, prevented from doing that. In one of our Facebook/text conversations, we said,

JAE: dammit. damn the geography..damn the oceans
we’d be married by now if you lived here. lol

HER: yeah. who the fuck needs oceans anyway? fish should learn to walk.

JAE: LOL. i just spewed my water

We should just look at it like a courtship phase. But it’s hard to court a woman when i can’t touch her. I guess I’ll have to use my other skills.

Dammit.

So we’ll continue to get to know one another, continue our writing project we’ve begun together, and just see what happens by August or so, when we’ll actually have the money saved for that horrendously expensive round-trip flight from where she is to where I am. Then we’ll see how we are with each other in the flesh. (I will forgo the obligatory sexual joke here).

I can say I don’t do long distance relationships. But it’s wise to never say never, because the Universe has a way of teaching you little lessons. Like, when I said that, I meant women from another state. IN THIS COUNTRY. And then I meet one in another country. Now I’d absolutely adore only having to drive four or eight hours to see her. Or 12.

Nothing is ever black and white, is it? I’ve said many times I make my camp in the grey areas.

Hopefully those grey areas will have color soon. Sort of like the color in What Dreams May Come. Ablaze with life not normally seen.

Be the first to like.

Chicken-Proper

The tendency for some humans to be weak-minded disturbs me sometimes. So often, it is easier to embrace the easy answer of “I don’t know” over the more difficult response, “I don’t know, but I’ll try to find out.”
Example: we’ve often heard the alleged conundrum “Which came first, the chicken or the egg?” as if this is some mind-bender of a riddle. It’s not as inexplicable as all that. To wit: from a scientific perspective, at one time, there were no chickens, and chickens appeared in the evolutionary chain because two non-chickens mated, created a zygote (first cell) of an offspring, and that cell divided, to create more cells that also divided repeatedly, with a mutation or two along the way that created the first chicken-PROPER. So the egg had to come first, before the First Chicken could exist. (the First Chicken: sounds like the president of the civilization founded on the planet of Hen).
I guess what I’m saying is, if you’re not intrigued, challenged and motivated by questions without answers (or with unsatisfactory ones) then you are an Intellectual chicken. I am loath to ever fall into that category, and I wish more people felt the same.
I don’t know what the chickens think about all this. I’m not bi-lingual.

Be the first to like.

No More Hall-Decking for You Guys

“Twelve Jews were brutally murdered, huge numbers maimed,

and many Jewish women were raped. Two million rubles worth

 of property was destroyed.”

~ Lawrence Kelleman

I
sn’t Christmas a wonderful time of year?
Consider this:
     Thus says the LORD, Do not learn the way of the nations, And do not be terrified by the signs of the Heavens, although the nations are terrified by them; For the customs of the peoples are delusion; Because it is wood cut from the forest, The work of the hands of a craftsman with a cutting tool. They decorate it with silver and with gold; They fasten it with nails and with hammers So that it will not totter” (Jeremiah 10:2-4).
     Okay, that’s it for all you Christmas-tree-hugging Christians. If you believe in what the Bible tells you, there will be no more Christmas trees or decorating!
     Thou mustest not decketh the halls!
     And lest you think the tree is the only borrowed symbol or tradition practiced by the God-fearing, allow me to shed a little light in a dark place.
In ancient Babylon, the date of December 25th was a celebration in honor of the son of Isis, the Goddess of Nature.
     In Rome, long before the birth of Christ, the Winter Solstice day of Saturnalia was celebrated in honor of Saturn, the god of agriculture. The Mummers, who went house to house, singing and dancing, sprang from this celebration, and from it, the tradition of caroling.
     Northern Europeans celebrated Yule, on Winter Solstice, the shortest day of the year, in honor of the birth of the sun god, Mithra. Kissing under the mistletoe began there, as a fertility ritual. Evergreen trees were brought indoors to remind them of the coming harvest.
     Even the Druids had a ritual around a tree.
     Since pagan Romans were in the majority in the year 350, Pope Julius I declared that the birth of Christ would be celebrated on December 25th, so as not to alienate them, and in hopes that they would convert to Christianity a bit more easily if they could keep the date of their feasts. The ritual of gift-giving began in Rome, as well:
     In pre-Christian Rome, the emperors compelled their most despised citizens to bring offerings and gifts during the Saturnalia (in December) and Kalends (in January).  Later, this ritual expanded to include gift-giving among the general populace.  The Catholic Church gave this custom a Christian flavor by re-rooting it in the supposed gift-giving of Saint Nicholas.[1]
The history of Saint Nicolas began in Turkey, where Nicolas was a bishop who convened the Council of Nicaea in 325 CE. After his death December 6, 345 CE, he was idolized, and eventually became the central figure when his bones were moved to Italy, and he replaced Pasqua Epiphania, “The Grandmother,” who used to put gifts for children in stockings. When The Grandmother was ousted, Nicolas became the focus of gift-giving. This cult made its way to Germany, where Nicolas was merged with the god Woden, and the white beard, winter clothing and his travel on a flying horse became the norm.
In a quest for adherents, the Catholic church adopted the Nicolas figure, and encouraged the pagans to exchange gifts on December 25th, rather than on the 6th. He soon became known by the Dutch version of his name, Santa Claus. The rest is just the natural progression of time and tradition.
     Christmas, then, is not a history of Christian celebration of the birth of Christ. It is more accurately a time when Jews were tortured and murdered, and a modified incarnation of the most reprehensible pagan rituals ever known. Here’s why:
     The pagans of Rome would force one community member to partake in debauchery and gluttony, and then when the festival ended on December 25th, they would destroy the dark forces by killing him.
Some of the most depraved customs of the Saturnalia carnival were intentionally revived by the Catholic Church in 1466 when Pope Paul II, for the amusement of his Roman citizens, forced Jews to race naked through the streets of the city.  An eyewitness account reports, “Before they were to run, the Jews were richly fed, so as to make the race more difficult for them and at the same time more amusing for spectators.  They ran… amid Rome’s taunting shrieks and peals of laughter, while the Holy Father stood upon a richly ornamented balcony and laughed heartily.[2]
In Warsaw, on December 25, 1881,
Twelve Jews were brutally murdered, huge numbers maimed, and many Jewish women were raped. Two million rubles worth of property was destroyed.[3]
Julius Streicher, a particularly depraved assistant to Hitler, wrote a Christmas editorial to Der Stuermer, an Anti-Semitic newspaper. In it, he said,
If one really wants to put an end to the continued prospering of this curse from Heaven that is the Jewish blood, there is only one way to do it: to eradicate this people, this Satan’s son, root and branch.
     Merry Christmas, everyone.
And that’s not the only thing that Christians don’t understand about their own beliefs. Many common themes and terminology don’t stem from the actual scriptures.
     Dan Barker, an ex-Christian minister and author of many essays and several books, including, Losing Faith in Faith: From Preacher to Atheist, confronts this.
The next time believers tell you that “separation of church and state” does not appear in our founding document, tell them to stop using the word “trinity.” The word “trinity” appears nowhere in the Bible. Neither does Rapture, or Second Coming, or Original Sin. If they are still unfazed (or unphrased) by this, then add Omniscience, Omnipresence, Supernatural, Transcendence, Afterlife, Deity, Divinity, Theology, Monotheism, Missionary, Immaculate Conception, Christmas, Christianity, Evangelical, Fundamentalist, Methodist, Catholic, Pope, Cardinal, Catechism, Purgatory, Penance, Transubstantiation, Excommunication, Dogma, Chastity, Unpardonable Sin, Infallibility, Inerrancy, Incarnation, Epiphany, Sermon, Eucharist, the Lord’s Prayer, Good Friday, Doubting Thomas, Advent, Sunday School, Dead Sea, Golden Rule, Moral, Morality, Ethics, Patriotism, Education, Atheism, Apostasy, Conservative (Liberal is in), Capital Punishment, Monogamy, Abortion, Pornography, Homosexual, Lesbian, Fairness, Logic, Republic, Democracy, Capitalism, Funeral, Decalogue, or Bible.[4]

 


[1]Clement Miles. Christmas Customs and Traditions: Their History and Significance, (Dover Publications, 1976), 178, 263-271.
[2] David I. Kertzer. The Popes Against the Jews: The Vatican’s Role in the Rise of Modern Anti-Semitism. (Alfred A. Knopf, 2001), 74.
[3]Lawrence Kelleman. “The Real Story of Christmas.” Simple To Remember. http://www.simpletoremember.com/vitals/Christmas_TheRealStory.htm.
[4]Dan Barker. “Quotations.” The Infidels: Infidels, Freethinkers, Humanists and Unbelievers. http://theinfidels.org/zunb-danbarker.htm.
Be the first to like.

Ignorance Revealed: Miss USA contestants on Evolution

The mindless regurgitation of these contestants sickens me. Most of these are stunning examples of the ignorance that still prevails in this country. Evolution is NOT a theory, in the colloquial sense. Scientific “theory” is not the same as the common definition of “theory.” That’s why I wish the scientific community would permanently change their references to it in some way, to clear up the misunderstanding. Since colloquial understanding usually RULES among the average person, we must begin to use terminology that leaves no room for erroneous interpretation. It is my contention that you are not entitled to respect or admiration if your opinions are based on ideas you were fed, which have no basis in fact. We should permanently append the word “unfounded” to the word “opinion” in this case. And any contest that bestows the title “Miss USA” should not allow ignorance to represent our country. “I was never taught evolution in school” –that’s the problem. Their opinions against it, are based on NOT KNOWING the facts. It’s easy to just swallow. Perhaps more people should refuse to stand in front of the hose.





Be the first to like.

Supernatural Completion

I finally ordered the proofs for my 6 volume book, Supernatural Hypocrisy: The Cognitive Dissonance of a God Cosmology. It will be available for the Holiday Shopping season.
Volume 1: Cosmology of God & Jesus
Volume 2: Cosmology of Christianity
Volume 3: Cosmology of the Bible
Volume 4: Cosmology of the Dark Side
Volume 5: Cosmology of Science
Volume 6: Cosmology of Atheism



Three years in the making, this is not a project I would like to do very often. It was mentally, emotionally and physically draining. The amount of research, double-checking, rewriting, formatting and other such mundane details were often mind-numbing. Then there was the constant decision-making about what information goes where–the subject of each volume often overlaps the subject of another, and I was constantly trying to keep track of where it all should go. It was, literally, like working on six books at a time. I crashed my Firefox browser and Word frequently.


But I believe this work is unique, in that it is in 6 volumes; I didn’t have to hyperfocus on one area of the subject matter, and condense it down so much. I could cover the territory i wanted to cover–share my journey–without leaving out any crucial bits that ultimately led me to my personal cosmology. I addressed each one I felt was primary in the search for understanding. So the book is fairly comprehensive in that way, though i learned quickly that there could have been another 6 volumes.


Just a couple stats:

  • In all 6 volumes combined, there are 1,322 pages and I used 477 sources.
  • I referenced Wikipedia only once, because it was the only place to get a biographical tidbit on a certain person. Otherwise, i used only reputable sources–science, news magazines, journals, newspapers, books– including many translations of the Bible, and translations of the Septuagint, Pseudepigrapha and other apocryphal texts.

I drew from a wide array of source-types and areas of study. The information and examination I used considered many different disciplines. Some of those include:

  • anthropobiology –  study of human biology
  • anthropology — study of human cultures
  • archaeology — study of human material remains
  • astronomy — study of celestial bodies
  • bioecology — study of interaction of life in the environment
  • biology –  study of life
  • bionomics  — study of organisms interacting in their environments
  • Egyptology — study of ancient Egypt
  • epistemology — study of grounds of knowledge
  • genesiology  — study of reproduction and heredity
  • genetics — branch of biology that studies heredity and variation in organisms
  • geochronology — study of measuring geological time
  • geogeny –  science of the formation of the earth’s crust
  • geogony — study of formation of the earth
  • geography — study of surface of the earth and its inhabitants
  • geology — study of earth’s crust
  • geomorphogeny — study of the origins of land forms
  • glossology  –  study of language; study of the tongue
  • historiology –  study of history
  • ichnology  — science of fossilized footprints
  • iconography — study of drawing symbols
  • iconology — study of icons; symbols
  • ideogeny –  study of origins of ideas
  • ideology — science of ideas; system of ideas used to justify behavior
  • idiomology — study of idiom, jargon or dialect
  • lexicology –  study of words and their meanings
  • liturgiology  — study of liturgical forms and church rituals
  • metaphysics –  study of principles of nature and thought
  • microbiology — study of microscopic organisms
  • micropalaeontology –  study of microscopic fossils
  • mythology –  study of myths; fables; tales
  • neuropsychology — study of relation between brain and behavior
  • noology — science of the intellect
  • palaeoanthropology — study of early humans
  • palaeobiology — study of fossil plants and animals
  • palaeontology — study of fossils
  • patrology — study of early Christianity
  • philology — study of ancient texts; historical linguistics
  • philosophy — science of knowledge or wisdom
  • physics –  study of matter and its motion through spacetime
  • pisteology — science or study of faith
  • psychology –  study of mind
  • psychopathology — study of mental illness
  • satanology –  study of the devil
  • sedimentology  — study of sediment
  • semantics — study of meaning
  • sociobiology — study of biological basis of human behaviour
  • sociology — study of society
  • stratigraphy — study of geological layers or strata
  • theology –  study of religion; religious doctrine
  • thermodynamics — study of relation of heat to motion
  • zooarchaeology –  study of animal remains of archaeological sites
  • zoogeography — study of geographic distribution of animals
  • zoogeology  — study of fossil animal remains
  • zoology — study of animals

If understanding belief, religion, God, and truth creates a list like that, then over-simplification of science by Believers,  is a little  infuriating.

This has been a taxing journey for me, but one which had to be taken. I have grown so much in my knowledge and understanding, and I have absolutely no doubt where i stand on the issue of religion. For myself, or for the world. My hope is that readers will find this work compelling, entertaining, informative and helpful in their own discernment of what they do and do not believe.

Be the first to like.

Science Heals, Religion Steals

Excerpt from

Supernatural Hypocrisy: 
The Cognitive Dissonance of a God Cosmology
Volume 5: The Cosmology of Science
“Science has done more for the development of the Western civilization 
in one hundred years than Christianity did in eighteen hundred.”
~John Burroughs

WE ENJOY THE SPOILS OF MODERN SCIENCE and technology which allows us to soar into the clouds and reach any destination in this manner, both quickly and comfortably. Individuals from antiquity must have lamented — and had much time to lament — the laborious tedium of traveling from point to point by foot or by beast. It is no wonder that mythology hosts an inherent wish to fly by its creation of the Phoenix, Pegusus, Sirens, Harpies, Griffins, Cherubim, Angels, vampires (as bats) and even Superman. We seem to maintain an uncommon fondness for the miraculous and the mythical, even to our own detriment and to the annihilation of others in our species, as well as the lesser species in our food chain. But just as we have assimilated into this technological society with our actions, so must our hearts and minds move from the imaginings of despairingly tedious superstitious history toward the truth which resides in realism.
Science has proven itself valuable time and again. It has been the messenger of understanding to the human race for some time now. Even myths that are still stubbornly clung to, have been proven false through the process of scientific method and empirical testing and double-blind examination.
For instance, the hoopla about the Shroud of Turin was eventually shown to be just that. Carbon dating showed that the fabric was not old enough to have been the burial cloth of Jesus, even if we accept the postulate that Jesus lived at all. Archeologists have also recently found another shroud that carbon dates to the alleged time of Jesus, (between 1 and 50 CE) but its material (not available in that region at the time) and its weave (too complex for the time) supports the finding that the Turin shroud was created in the Middle Ages, between 1260-1390 CE.
The Jerusalem tomb in which the new shroud was found, had been sealed shut with plaster for the last 2,000 years, and scientists suspect it was not opened for the second burial (it was customary to rebury the dead after a year) because they were trying to prevent the spread of tuberculosis and leprosy, which was found in the DNA of the bones in the recently discovered shroud.
This information should act as precursor to our ability to scrutinize mysterious discoveries, before we attach a magical explanation to it. It should extend to other seemingly miraculous things.
For instance, we know now that God did not carve out the Grand Canyon with his giant cosmic spoon. We know it began to form almost 17 million years ago,[1] by the process of water and wind erosion, continental drift, volcanism and the behavior of the Colorado River.
We have been schooled in the realities of stage magicianship, and allowed ourselves to be amazed while also knowing that this performer has no mystical gift bestowed by an endowment from dark arts, or an omniscient being, but is merely fooling us with his skills at sleight-of-hand and optical illusion. And many will depart from that auditorium and next day, to be found in church, worshiping that invisible being with complete and utter devotion. Until those stalwart believers admit there that is no difference in the two, we will remain a nation with believers in the majority, and will suffer for its various consequences.
—————————
[1] Wilford, John (2008-02-06). Study Says Grand Canyon Older Than Thought. New York Times.

Be the first to like.

The Great Fib

excerpt from 
Supernatural Hypocrisy: 
The Cognitive Dissonance of a God Cosmology
Volume 3: Cosmology of the Bible
 by
Kelli Jae Baeli
The Great Fib

There’s a huge hole in the whole Flood drama, because anything that could float or swim got away scot-free, and it was the idea to wipe out everything, He didn’t say, “I will kill everything, except the floating ones and the swimming ones, who will get out due to a loophole. ~ Eddie Izzard

The story of the flood is a familiar to most people. A man is instructed by God to build a large boat to save himself and his family, along with the male and female of each animal species. God then sends a great flood, and all are drowned except for the occupants of the vessel.
Am I speaking of Noah and the Ark? Yes. But also of The Epic of Gilgamesh, and The Egyptian Book of the Divine Cow. (I kid you not.) From texts discovered in the tombs of pharaohs, we learn of a tale about the people turning bad and the sun god who had to kill them all and start civilization over. The Divine Cow was a transformation from the Goddess Nut. (I promise you, I’m not making this up. But someone did, and that’s the point here).
 
The Biblical motifs of the Fall and the Flood suggest a rupture, a necessary loss of “eternity”, forcing mankind to return to the original state of perfection through history. In the Judeo-Christian tradition, this cleavage between man and God ensued when the former ate from the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge (between good and evil). So history starts when, stripped naked, man, in blood, sweat & tears, has to work for his living. But this is not enough. Divine wrath floods humanity, leaving only a small percentage alife (cf. Noah). The literary parallels are obvious (cf. infra).[1]
The Gilgamesh story was itself a borrowed tale of Sumerian origin. Both these ancient stories were combined and altered to produce the Biblical flood story. The Gilgamesh epic was written on 12 clay tablets in cuneiform script, and dating to between 2750 and 2500 BCE—long before the story of Noah was to have taken place. In fact, The Epic of Gilgamesh is thought by ancient historians to be the oldest written story ever found.
Most Christians view the flood story as unique to Christianity, but it is, in fact, a copy of the two other stories, tweaked to fit the needs of the Christian religion. There are obvious similarities that cannot escape the attention of anyone capable of employing reason. For example, In the Biblical account, we see:

Make for yourself an ark of gopher wood; you shall make the ark with rooms, and shall cover it inside and out with pitch. This is how you shall make it: the length of the ark three hundred cubits, its breadth fifty cubits, and its height thirty cubits. You shall make a window for the ark, and finish it to a cubit from the top; and set the door of the ark in the side of it; you shall make it with lower, second, and third decks. Behold, I, even I am bringing the flood of water upon the earth, to destroy all flesh in which is the breath of life, from under heaven; everything that is on the earth shall perish. “But I will establish My covenant with you; and you shall enter the ark—you and your sons and your wife, and your sons’ wives with you. “And of every living thing of all flesh, you shall bring two of every kind into the ark, to keep them alive with you; they shall be male and female. “Of the birds after their kind, and of the animals after their kind, of every creeping thing of the ground after its kind, two of every kind will come to you to keep them alive. “As for you, take for yourself some of all food which is edible, and gather it to yourself; and it shall be for food for you and for them.” Thus Noah did; according to all that God had commanded him, so he did. (GEN 6:14-22).

In the Epic of Gilgamesh, we see:

Tear down the house and build a boat!
Abandon wealth and seek living beings!
Spurn possessions and keep alive living beings!
Make all living beings go up into the boat. The boat which you are to build, its dimensions must measure equal to each other: its length must correspond to its width. Roof it over like the Apsu. I understood and spoke to my lord, Ea: ‘My lord, thus is the command which you have uttered I will heed and will do it. (Tablet XI)

The Gilgamesh author also used the measurement of cubits[2] as did the Biblical story of the flood.
The child carried the pitch, the weak brought whatever else was needed. On the fifth day I laid out her exterior. It was a field in area, its walls were each 10 times 12 cubits in height, the sides of its top were of equal length, 10 times It cubits each. (Tablet XI)
Both stories also tell of the boat mooring or being stuck on a mountain. In the Bible, it was Mountains of Ararat, in Gilgamesh, it was Mount Nimush.
And just as the biblical story, a bird was sent out to seek land, and finally land was located, and the animals of the ark were released. In the biblical account, it says,
 
…and he sent out a raven, and it flew here and there until the water was dried up from the earth. Then he sent out a dove from him, to see if the water was abated from the face of the land; but the dove found no resting place for the sole of her foot, so she returned to him into the ark, for the water was on the surface of all the earth. Then he put out his hand and took her, and brought her into the ark to himself. So he waited yet another seven days; and again he sent out the dove from the ark. The dove came to him toward evening, and behold, in her beak was a freshly picked olive leaf. So Noah knew that the water was abated from the earth. Then he waited yet another seven days, and sent out the dove; but she did not return to him again. (8:7-12)
Notice the similarities in the Gilgamesh version:

I sent forth a dove and released it. The dove went off, but came back to me; no perch was visible so it circled back to me. I sent forth a swallow and released it. The swallow went off, but came back to me; no perch was visible so it circled back to me. I sent forth a raven and released it. The raven went off, and saw the waters slither back. It eats, it scratches, it bobs, but does not circle back to me. Then I sent out everything in all directions and sacrificed [a sheep].(Tablet XI)

Now, according to reason, it becomes plain that the flood stories are myth, based solely on this information, and common sense. The truth is even more illuminated by the obvious flaws.
Historically, the Tigris and Euphrates rivers did overflow and cause great damage, but nothing as severe as the biblical account relates. The only river in the region that could have been involved was the Jordan, but it was below sea level. There are no historical records, nor archeological nor geological evidence that show a flood of this magnitude in the region.
Aside from the obvious widespread killing of everyone who wasn’t on the ark, including children and animals who could not logically be regarded as “evil”—there are the usual problems.
Regarding the logistics of Noah and the Ark, first, the size of the Ark would have resulted in the boat breaking in half under the force of the first wave it encountered; modern ship builders know this for certain. They also know that Noah could not have constructed this Ark in the amount of time allotted.
The animals that Noah allegedly loaded onto the Ark (using both versions of that information found in two different places in Genesis) would not only be too numerous to fit, as our modern science tells us that 99% of the world’s species are now extinct, and it’s obvious that even if the Ark were built and loaded today, they wouldn’t fit; so why would they fit then, when there were millions. Remember there was only “one” creation, according to the bible. This, even though the fossil record shows us that there were many rebirths of new species when others were wiped out (remember the dinosaurs?). The fossil record also shows us that modern species began later—that’s why they are called modern. To hear the theists tell it, all the animals, of all kinds were created by God, during the Original Creation of the world. That’s easily explained, of course, by the facts of evolution; which theists insist isn’t accurate.
Back to the Ark: Also, there would be no room to store water and food for them, and no way the small group of people on board could care for them and clean up after them. Not to mention that it would collapse from the weight and sink. Then there’s the fact that all animals weren’t indigenous to the area in which Noah lived, yet there is no mention of a “road trip” to herd all those animals to the Ark. Additionally, if one only has a male and female of each species, this would create mutants due to inbreeding.
And what about this verse?

“…taking some of all the clean animals and clean birds, he sacrificed burnt offerings on it. The LORD smelled the pleasing aroma and said in his heart: “Never again will I curse the ground because of man, even though every inclination of his heart is evil from childhood. And never again will I destroy all living creatures, as I have done” (GEN 8:20-21)

Noah took “some of all” of the animals, which would mean there were some who couldn’t “be fruitful and multiply” because, as we know, Noah loaded the Ark with one male and one female of each kind. That would leave some without a mate. Those species must have just died out. Maybe that’s what happened to the dinosaurs, eh?
Also, the most glaring error of all: why did the animals have to be saved in the first place? Since God is omnipotent, why couldn’t he just re-create them all after the flood waters receded?
Other details in the flood story don’t add up, either. God places a rainbow in the sky to remind himself of the event—though why a Omni-everything being would need a atmospheric Post-it Note is beyond me.
There’s also the obvious belief by the author of the Book of Genesis that the Earth was flat, and there was only water above the dome of sky and below the ground. Again, if God created all these things, and then inspired men to write about them, would he not correct such a profound inaccuracy?
And what about the depth of the water as told in Genesis 7:19-20? “The water prevailed more and more upon the earth, so that all the high mountains everywhere under the heavens were covered. The water prevailed fifteen cubits higher, and the mountains were covered.” If we figure a cubit as on the average being 19 inches, that would mean the water level reached around 24 feet. Obviously not enough to cover all those mountains, even the smallest of the small. It’s another case of making a mountain out of a molehill; common in the Christian religion.
————————————
 
[1] See van den Dungen.
 
[2] A cubit was an ancient unit of length, equal to the distance from the elbow to the tip of the middle finger, approximately 43-56 cm (17-22 in) [14th century. Latin cubitum “elbow, forearm” (Encarta Dictionary).

Be the first to like.

Mind-Bending Esoterica

 Open Letter to Spiritual Person Regarding Belief in Supernatural
based on several posts on Facebook to my Wall. 
First, this subject matter does not lend itself to a sound-byte. That’s why science is often wrongly interpreted as unable to respond to wild claims from believers in the supernatural. Complicated things require complicated explanations.
Second, this content is not directed at you, CMorte, exclusively. I will be speaking both toward your comments, and toward the spiritual community at large.
Third, yes I was a little harsh.  I will try to keep my anger at bay long enough to explain why I react that way….this is where Political Correctness and progress intersect (if not with a simple fender-bender, then certainly with an eardrum-splitting crash). Political Correctness has discouraged us, as a society, from speaking the truth, for fear it might damage someone’s fragile sensibilities.  Progress should never be impeded by a need to coddle adults who respond to the world as children.
SH_vol2_COC_11Feb11frcvr1FINAL2_138x212
This leads to other things, the least of which is redefining the meaning of words, so that no one can communicate clearly anymore.
I am working on my own book as well, (Supernatural Hypocrisy: The Cognitive Dissonance of a God Cosmology) and the more I have researched and learned THE FACTS, the more I have moved toward a certain intensity about how damaging and ridiculous this subject is. So yes, I get intense, because this type of worldview has caused and is causing great suffering and peril and death to us all. It’s causing a great number of otherwise intelligent people to cling to a collection of atavistic concepts that have not, and never will serve humanity in any ultimately beneficial way. Any benefits that spirituality ostensibly provides to its adherents, can be found equally in the  worldview of philosophy and ethics, communities of other kinds, and so on. It’s a myth that the only morality, hope, purpose and comfort to be found, resides only in the supernatural. And this supernatural belief paradigm endangers ME and those I love, and humanity in general.
So yes, I take it personally, though not so long ago, I didn’t. I thought “live and let live”–as long as it didn’t infringe on my pursuit of happiness or my rights or my freedoms or my safety. Now, I take it personally, because it has been personalized and all those privately individual aspects are under siege. Now it DOES infringe on my pursuit of happiness, my freedoms and rights, and my safety. Now, we are seeing the results of people believing in the supernatural, and WANTING or NEEDING to believe in it, coupled with a technological society that allows them to act on it in a global way. It leads to the corruption of scientific principals, the twisting of facts to suit a more comfortable set of ideas in the believer. And that affects us ALL.
But I guess Christians are the only ones allowed righteous anger; because they are the bedrock of belief in this country. All other beliefs seem to just spring from there. How often in the last decade, have Christians backed off the dogma and simply adopted the tenets that they liked best, dropping the rest? How often do we hear “I’m spiritual, but not religious”? This indicates not only that morality and goodness is inherent in people regardless of the presence of religion, but also the often lethargic evolution of a realization; a concept no longer making sense. It’s  a rare individual who denies a prevailing and sanctioned lie with the severity of a guillotine. Mostly, the denial comes in incremental steps away from the doctrine, when a human brain is niggled constantly by cognitive dissonance. Thus, “spirituality” is one of those steps. It’s still a belief in supernatural, just without the main supernatural component of a supreme deity at the helm.
 You said,

i am at a stand-still in my research because I am convinced now that we have the power within our minds to recreate a haunting based on our beliefs. i refuse to say that nothing or everything can be debunked but that if we believe we are being haunted evidence will back it up simply because the power of our minds is so powerful it can manifest our beliefs on film.”

Yes i do have a strong mind. Not the point here. I asked for proof. You don’t seem to have any. You just have assertions.

“the proof lies in the research of Dr. Bohm and his colleuges. they believed so strongly in the holographic universe theory that it seems to explain alot of our mind’s capabilities”

If you’re referring to Dr. David Bohm, the physicist–he interpreted quantum mechanics in his own way, but his theory of holographic universe was overall rejected, since his premises required connections that are subliminal and which violate the principles of special relativity. There is no real evidence of his theory, nor of the subquantum forces he includes in his postulate. If there ever is any evidence to support his claims, then science will find it, test it and it will then be accepted if proven to a high degree of certainty. Until then, it is not to be considered “proof” in the true definition of the word.
But notice that Bohm was well known to be gullible and to entertain esoteric ideas with no basis in fact. Bohm carried a key around with him he believed Uri Geller bent, as if it were a holy relic. We now know exactly how this key-bending was done. Michael Shermer even demonstrated it on a video. So while Bohm might have been a brilliant mind, it didn’t preclude him having some erroneous, illogical, and delusional ideas about other things, which again, were never proven to have any veracity whatsoever.

CMorte: “Paranormal is anything that can not be explained by science. parapsychology is anything that our minds have created that can not be cured by medication – my definitions”

Jae Baeli:”I am aware of the definitions of these words.”

There are many things that haven’t yet been explained by science, but they do not fall into the category of paranormal. Also, to say “anything our minds have created” is to give the subject a wide field. There are also many things our minds create that aren’t explained fully, yet don’t require medication. This type of vagueness is also a component of the communication problem between rationalists and spiritualists.

CMorte: “I was being a smart ass bout meds. In this realm nobody is an expert. As far as im concerned nobody knows anything”

Jae Baeli: “there are quite a few people who know quite a few things. I find that statement absurd….especially since you seem to be so convinced of your own beliefs…so which is it? you believe in everything? nothing? only in what YOU believe, but not in anything else? the tooth fairy? Leprechauns?”

CMorte: “scientifically none of that is proven but i like to lend credit to the believers. when some people believe so hard in something it is true to them. miracles happen or whatever that motivate them to believe harder. i think (and i’m not telling anybody else what to think) anything is possible…by nobody knows anything i was talking about the paranormal. i figured as a skeptic you would agree. i just got off work and was catching up and saw all this. i am sorry really i am. i didn’t expect you to take it so personally. i just posted it on your wall because i didn’t want to send it in a message.”

Why do you “like to lend credit to the believers?” Why is that your goal? What purpose does that serve in your estimation? What you describe is a manifestation of delusion, created in the minds of those who are susceptible to magical ideas. The end result is that they “believe harder” and I contend this is a negative, not a positive, because it entrenches them even more deeply into delusion and denial, and perpetuates the deification of falsehood, and the dismissal of truth.
As a skeptic, I don’t accept as fact things unproven–that much is true. That doesn’t mean I don’t believe in anything. I believe in quite a few things. Like education, honesty, self-awareness, truth, self-responsibility, friendship, love, learning, ethics, separation of church and state, etc….These beliefs don’t affect my ability to recognize facts and truth. And they do not reportedly determine the fate of my soul, or exist under threat of suffering if i don’t choose to embrace them. They are concepts that inform the quality of my daily life and my interactions with others. I have imposed a subjective value on these things, for those reasons. This is nothing like the tenets of faith and belief in supernatural, as these ideas are attached to the concepts of guilt, fear, suffering and death, springing, as they did, from monotheistic belief systems. So it follows that supernatural belief systems are insidious in their ability to usurp the thinking mind, and instead draw on the primitive reactions of the amygdala, where reason cannot get a foothold.
So when you say you are a skeptic, CMorte,  I have to point out that the data seems to indicate otherwise. You say you “don’t believe in anything”–but that’s not any truer for you than it is for me, as I pointed out above. This statement is contradicted by the things you write. And you are even writing a monstrous book about guiding people on “the other side”!! That implicitly states a belief in souls, afterlife, and all things supernatural (it also assumes facts not in evidence, which is YOUR BELIEF in something). When you speak of demons and goddesses and anything else supernatural, and you frame it in a context of having experienced phenomena like this, then you BELIEVE IT. The fact that you have labeled these things, means you think you know what the experiences actually were, and thus, they are real to you. This, while admitting to drug use during at least some of those experiences. It’s easy to see why you would count those experiences as “real”–you were under the influence of something as strong as your own wishes and needs, namely, a drug.
The significance of this becomes clear. It’s not Astrophysics. We know that the drug katamine can induce a Near Death Experience in the brain, too. We also know that electrical impulses in the brain, when pinpointed and excited manually by a surgeon, can also produce other experiences of that sort. That doesn’t mean it “happened” objectively, it only happened subjectively. This is not, however, indicative of truth. When people say “It’s true because i saw it” or “It’s real because I felt it” or “I know it in my heart”–they are misusing the terminology of true/real/know. True and meaningful are not the same in this context; nor is Knowing and believing. But the spiritual folks among us continue to try to blur the line, and combine belief with fact. It can’t be done, unless you change the defintions.Additionally, when you announce you have no beliefs, I wonder why that seems a badge of honor to you?  “no belief” would include love, honesty, ethics, conservation, charity, alternative fuels, voting, kindness, equal rights, etc–the word “anything” in this context is all inclusive, just like the word “nothing” which is “no thing.” Believing “in nothing” doesn’t make you an atheist. NOT believing in supernatural beings and realms is what makes you an atheist. You are not, by definition, an atheist. Semantics is an important issue, here. I can say that I believe in UFO’s and
this would be a true statement because I know that UFO is an abbreviation for Unidentified Flying Object, and yes, there have been instances when an object was flying and it could not be identified. That doesn’t mean I believe that they are spaceships, piloted by extraterrestrials. And it doesn’t speak to my opinion on whether or not that might be possible. These are more examples of logical fallacy, and the variables inside these arguments are the catalyst for misunderstanding. Thus, you must understand what you are saying, and you must use the same dictionary everyone else has agreed to use. That’s what a standardized dictionary is for.
Additionally, saying that you don’t believe in anything means you can’t make a logical decision based on facts; and that ought not be referenced as a source of pride, in my opinion. Then, in a heel-spin of contradiction, you speak of things as if they are true, when they are not. So perhaps you’re not communicating yourself accurately. Is that it?  Or do you merely deceive yourself by saying you don’t believe in anything? I contend that you do believe in many things (as all humans do), and it comes through repeatedly in everything you talk about. I’m not sure what compels you to deny participation in the act of owning what you believe. It requires no courage to stand aside and say you don’t believe in anything. That’s not being open-minded, that’s refusing to take responsibility for your own ability to make decisions. I find that stance intellectually dishonest.My issue with it is that belief should be predicated on truth. So I don’t use it in the same context as it is used colloquially and theologically. And yes I do get intense about it, because it’s high time the logical and rational among us stop allowing Believers to make all the rules and get all the free passes, while systematically destroying everything that would save us, the planet and honor our own evolution as sentient beings. It’s no longer innocuous to be spiritual or religious. It now bleeds over into the lives of EVERYONE. Unfounded beliefs keep children from learning the science that will allow them to understand how life and the universe really operates; unfounded beliefs map young minds into knots of hatred, superstition and fear rather than in acceptance, discernment and clarity; unfounded beliefs cause people to neglect proven medical care for themselves or their children; unfounded beliefs cause people to kill each other, start wars, commit acts of torture, genocide, infanticide, hate crimes, cause oppression, starvation,  child abuse, rape; unfounded beliefs incite groups to intend and plan
takeovers of our secular government; unfounded beliefs cause someone in power to put their finger on a red button that will annihilate life as we know it.
Damn right I get intense. 
I have a right to live, and THEY don’t have the right to take it from me.
Now you might think you are not in this category, but I contend you are only a step away, because all it takes is the willingness to accept ideas without proof, which you have already demonstrated repeatedly. So I’m sorry if my intensity offends you. But I’m pretty weary of biting my lip about it. As Frantz Fanon said, “There comes a time when silence becomes dishonesty.” I have no desire to be guilty of either.You said, “i am not trying to be offensive. i am not trying to argue.”  This is the way spiritual people weasel out of the fray. They deny any malice, and say they don’t want to argue. The reason is, if they engage in a rational argument, their beliefs and postulates will be shown false and even sometimes absurd, and this is not something they are open to.
Now, I have been accused of being single-minded in my recent full conversion to atheism. And further, been accused of hypocrisy on some level, because I cannot be persuaded to believe again. But the point to be had here, is that I WAS A BELIEVER. I  said all those same things, clung to all those same ideas, and defended them to others, just as believers do now to me. So I have been on the “other side” in that regard (pun intended) and made a logical decision to deny its veracity, based on the development of my intelligence, and the evidence and clarity of thought and reason. So implications of my stubborn single-mindedness are unfounded. I came to conclusions based on facts, and now honor my conclusions, since there have been no other facts or evidence to change them.
You said,

“in fact, I was posting something personal to me that was mainly just some ideas. wasn’t trying to get everyone riled up. i was just speaking to you as a friend not as a scientist or an expert.”

So, if you speak casually, in a friend-kind-of-way, this excludes the necessity for truth? or rational thinking? or clarity of belief? If you are merely ruminating innocently, why work so hard on a book that is quite copious and detailed regarding supernatural forces and conditions in a plane of existence no one has proof for, and even you yourself haven’t experienced in reality? I think what you are really doing is back-peddling in the face of a rational argument.

“in this realm evidence is anything that happens consistantly and with documented evidence. alot of this eye/camera/orb stuff can only be based on the ghost documentary shows i saw on tv. not saying it is real but it is “believeable” to me. i can’t physically show you or else it wouldn’t be paranormal. some things are consistant with the research tho and that is electromagnetic energy that when charged from a source lights up. and seems to be consistant with a haunting and the frequency of our chakras. that is all i have as far as evidence. sorry to have let you down today.”

You mention “evidence” so glibly, it’s clear you  don’t understand the meaning of the word as I mean it, which is as science sees it. When I  speak of evidence, I refer to empirical, not anecdotal. I refer to the use of scientific method with falsifiability and double-blind procedures at play; not a photograph that “seems” to indicate something magical or out of the ordinary. You mention the “Frequency of chakras”–yet, again, you use another unprovable item to prove your other unprovable item. Chakras are an IDEA that became a cultural meme, but have no basis in fact.  Adherents imbue the idea with some supposed authority beyond the realm of science, but this also places it beyond the realm of fact and thus, of truth. But try to get a believer to understand this, and you’ll be at it for eons. The irony with this sort of thought-paradigm is that if you don’t know how to think things through properly and logically, you are unaware that you don’t know how to think things through properly and logically. That’s why the arguments go on between the rational and the irrational–between atheists and spiritual/religious individuals. The problem can only be solved by educating as many people as possible in the skills of rational thought.
At the risk of this eons-long head-butting, I will point out that you have repeatedly utilized logical fallacy, and in fact, used almost all of the most common ones:
  • Tautology, or circular reasoning (A=B because A=B).
  • Special Pleading, AKA ad hoc reasoning, (arbitrarily adding new elements in an effort to repair their lack of validity)
  • Non-sequiter, (implying a logical connection where none exists)
  • Moving the Goalpost (A method of denial that moves the criteria out of range of the evidence)
  • post hoc ergo propter hoc (Latin for after this, therefore because of this; assuming a cause and effect relationship of things simply because one thing came before another),
  • Inconsistency –Applying criteria or rules to one belief, claim, argument, or position but not to others).
  • God of the Gaps (which is merely explaining something mysterious by plugging in a supernatural explanation);
  • Confusing association with causation, (similar to post-hoc, except it’s when two things happen in proximity of time or location, and are assumed to be related).
  • Argument from Personal Incredulity, (lack of personal understanding is interpreted to mean it cannot be true)
  • Argument from Authority, (stating a claim is true because a person or group perceived as an authority says so)
  • Argument from Ignorance (a statement must be true because we don’t know it isn’t true)
Understand that in all the 200,000 years that humans have been on the earth, not once has there been empirical evidence of supernatural claims. Never. Not even enough to serve in a court of law under the “beyond a reasonable doubt” edict. This fact must give us pause. If something were indeed true, in all those millennia, wouldn’t we have some shred of proof for it?
But humans are relentless in their need to depend on the supernatural to find their value in this life. Matthew Alper, author of The God Part of the Brain: A Scientific Interpretation of Human Spirituality and God, approaches this subject head-on, in what seems to be an emerging understanding among scientific circles about why humans are so staunchly attached to the ideas of the supernatural:

“Essentially, what I’m suggesting is that humans are innately “hard-wired” to perceive a spiritual reality. We are “hard-wired” to believe in forces that transcend the limitations of this, our physical reality. Most controversial of all, if what I’m suggesting is true, it would imply that God is not necessarily something that exists “out there,” beyond and independent of us, but rather as the product of an inherited perception, the manifestation of an evolutionary adaptation that exists within the human brain. And why would our species have evolved such a seemingly abstract trait? -In order to enable us to deal with our species’ unique and otherwise debilitating awareness of death.

With the dawn of human intelligence, for the first time in the history of terrestrial life, an organism could point its powers of perception back upon its own being; it could recognize its own self as an object. For the first time, when an animal kneeled down to drink from the watering hole, it recognized its own reflection. Only humans possess the advanced capacity for self-awareness. Though, in many ways, this capacity has helped to make our species the most versatile and powerful creature on earth, it also represents the source of our greatest affliction. This is because once we became aware of the fact that we exist, we became equally aware of not just the possibility that one day we might not, but the certainty that one day we will not. With the advent of our species, with the emergence of self-conscious awareness, a life form became cognizant of the fact that it is going to die. All we had to do was to look around us to see that death was inevitable and inescapable. More terrifying yet, death could befall us at anytime. Any moment can be our last.

All life is “hard-wired” to avoid those things that represent a threat to its existence. When an animal gets too close to fire, for example, it reflexively pulls away. It is this negative stimulus, this experience we call pain, that prompts all forms of life to avoid such potential life threats. Pain, therefore, acts as nature’s electric prod that incites us to avoid those things which may jeopardize our existence.

In the “higher” animals, most particularly among the mammals, threatening circumstances elicit a particular type of pain we refer to as anxiety. Anxiety constitutes a type of pain meant to prompt these “higher” order animals to avoid potentially hazardous circumstances. For example, a rabbit is cornered by a mountain lion. In such a situation, the rabbit is pumped with adrenaline, charged with the painful symptoms of anxiety, all meant to incite the rabbit to most effectively escape from the source of its discomfort, in this case the mountain lion. In its healthiest form, anxiety is meant to prompt an animal to avoid or escape a potentially hazardous experience. In humans, however, once we became aware of the fact that death was not only inescapable but that it could come at any moment, we were left in a state of constant mortal peril, a state of unceasing anxiety – much like rabbits perpetually cornered by a mountain lion from which there is no escape. With the emergence of self-awareness, humans became the dysfunctional animal, rendered helpless by an inherent and unceasing anxiety disorder. Unless nature could somehow relieve us of this debilitating awareness of death, it’s possible our species might have soon become extinct. It was suddenly critical that our animal be modified in some way that would allow us to maintain self-conscious awareness, while enabling us to deal with our unique awareness of our own mortalities, of death.

Here lies the origin of humankind’s spiritual function, an evolutionary adaptation that compels our species to believe that though our physical bodies will one day perish, our “spirits” or “souls” will persist for all eternity. Only once our species was instilled with this inherent (mis)perception that there is something more “out there,” that we are immortal beings, were we able to survive our debilitating awareness of death.”

And that is a compelling argument about why people believe in the supernatural, and why logic and reason seem so out of reach for those who desperately need something outside of themselves to give them courage or purpose or hope. It is my fervent desire, to see the swelling of ranks in those who find these things inside themselves, instead.

Be the first to like.

Jaime Kilstein (on Gays & God, mostly)

Be the first to like.

Cosmology of the Dark Side–Hell

Excerpted from
“Supernatural Hypocrisy:
The Cognitive Dissonance of a God Cosmology”
Volume 4: The Cosmology of the Dark Side
by
Kelli Jae Baeli
Gnashing of Teeth
“God says do what you wish, but make the wrong choice and you will be tortured for eternity in hell. That’s not free will. It’s like a man telling his girlfriend, do what you wish, but if you choose to leave me, I will track you down and blow your brains out. When a man says this we call him a psychopath. When god says the same we call him “loving” and build churches in his honor.” ~William C. Easttom II
Hell. The most successful fear-tactic ever devised.
The most blatantly obvious flaw in the logic here, is that people will be sentenced to life in eternal pain and torment for behaving naturally. God created humans, then punished them for acting according to the natures HE ostensibly gave them.
The punishment of Hell, could not rationally be in place as a deterrent to sin, since an omniscient God would already know who and how many would be sinful and go to Hell. Since this number is in a sense pre-ordained, that number of people would be sentenced to Hell anyway, and thus, cannot act as a deterrent, since a deterrent acts to change something inherently changeable.
According to Christian dogma, those who don’t know God and accept Jesus as their personal savior, are doomed to spend eternity in torment. The obvious flaw here, is that there are many people who will never even have the opportunity to be exposed to the Christian religion. What of that? If a person is not privy to the information, how can they rightfully be condemned to a horrible eternal fate? Christians are quick to say that’s why they have ministries in the far reaches of Earth. This does not, however, address the original incongruity: God has put a system in place that is neither rational, fair, nor loving.
Any reasonably loving and sane person of good mental health, who has children, will tell you that they love their children in spite of the bad things they might do. Mistakes and even egregious errors will not delete the love a parent has for the child.
The main reason for this, skipping the biological details, is that the parent created this child and that’s a bond that endures. And we have so anthropomorphized God in that two-direction expressway of God creating us in His image, that we assume, perhaps without being aware of it, that God would behave toward us, much like we would behave toward our own children. Yet, we dismiss the absurdity and cruelty of this God when he threatens to send us to hell for something as negligible as a lack of faith in Him.
Parents, if your children, in a fit of pique, said they hated you, would you pour gasoline on your child and set him ablaze? Not unless you are one of those mentally deranged people we hear about periodically. So why is God any less deranged and cruel to do that to HIS children? The flaw in the logic here, is obvious.
The usual rebuttal from defending Christians is the “free will” refrain. But how is it free will to choose to love or worship a deity, when he’s holding a god-sized gun to your head? I have already refuted the free will defense, and I won’t belabor the point here, other than to say coercion does not inspire trust, love, devotion or respect in me. I can’t speak for anyone else.
But this should, at the very least, make one question the existence of a Hell, or God, as a benevolent being, and even make you question the existence of God altogether.


 0

The First Spark

According to Christianity, eternal suffering awaits anyone who questions 
God’s infinite love. That’s the message we’re brought up with, believe or die. 
“Thank you, forgiving Lord, for all those options.”
~Bill Hicks
The belief in a terrifying underworld first began with the Egyptians, and their religious tome, The Egyptian Book of the Dead. This text delineates the ways in which the underworld is successfully traversed, to include the necessary spells and rituals. There were seven gates a soul had to pass through, before arriving for judgment in front of the King Osiris, which was the mythological equivalent to the Christian God.
By the 6th Century BCE, the concept of Hell was embodied in the religion of Zoroastrianism, springing from the teaching of the prophet, Zoroaster. In this version, the dead were judged by walking across a paper-thin bridge called Shin Vah. The good souls passed over and the condemned ones fell into the fiery pit below.
This new characterization of God began during the Babylonian Exile, when the Israelites crossed paths with followers of the prophet, Zoraoaster, who lived circa 630-550 BCE. Zoraoaster’s adherents believe that time was divided into a current age of darkness and a future age of light, which would end in a final battle between good and evil, wherein the good would receive reward and the evil would be annihilated.
This eschatology soon became part of the Christian dogma, and appeared in apocalyptic writings such as that found in the Book of Daniel, 200 years before Jesus appeared. Though Daniel was said to have been written by the prophet of the same name 400 years preceding, it was instead written by an unknown author who told of disasters happening in his time. So Daniel was not a forecast, but a reporting of current events. This was just another way that Christian dogma borrowed and altered facts to its own devices.[1]
0

The Evil Landlord

After Hell was successfully embedded in the human consciousness, the concept evolved. Someone decided that if this underworld existed, it needed a landlord. And the landlord had to be evil.
If, as the Christians claim, God created the Universe and everything in it, then that would include Satan. The immediate question that arose for me was, if God’s answer to the unworthiness and evil of men was met with a giant flood that killed them all, then why didn’t he annihilate the Devil when he rebelled in Heaven?
According to Christian underpinnings of belief, Satan had this little slice of real estate called Hell in which to operate his business of tempting humans into his fold, in opposition to God. The Devil would reportedly take the form of a human female, have sex with unsuspecting men, possibly just for his own entertainment, and then transform again to a human male and have sex with a female, thus implanting the seed of Satan, and interbreeding with humanity. There have been reports of nuns being attacked by Satan—in the form of priests. No great mystery here; it didn’t occur to them until the modern age that maybe they were actually being raped by a priest.
Even so, the overwhelming suggestion was always that women must be careful not to tempt men into the act of forced sexual intercourse, as if this were a possibility. Thus, it was again the woman’s fault when a man misbehaved. Christianity used scapegoating as part of its dogma, whether this is admitted openly or not. I contend that at the very least, Satan, in this regard, was merely a representation of the belief that sex was inherently dirty, and maybe also that men can behave in ways that embody that evil.
Nonetheless, besides the females of our species, Satan is the ultimate scapegoat. Humanity seems to need this being to blame for their own transgressions. Again, this is part and parcel of individuals not taking responsibility for themselves and their actions.
Joseph Conrad said, “The belief in a supernatural source of evil is not necessary; men alone are quite capable of every wickedness.”
0
The backstory is that God created Satan as good, but Satan rebelled and became evil. There are immediately some issues with the nonsensical nature of the existence of such a being. Why would God—who is supposedly an omni-everything being—create something that had the capacity for becoming evil? Isn’t this a flaw in logic? If God is omniscient, then He knew Satan would turn bad. So, either God intended this to happen, or He didn’t care. This would make his creation process frivolous at least, and contradictory to His own nature at most. If God did NOT know Satan would turn evil, then God is not omniscient. Which renders Him ungodlike.
That aside, God did not destroy Satan when he went to the quintessential Dark Side. Why? Because he thought Satan could serve some greater purpose? And what purpose might that be, when we are talking about an omnipotent god who can make anything happen, without the aid of some rogue angel? It negates the supposed nature of God.
As with the biblical story of Job, Christians have been taught that God would not allow Satan to inflict more harm than one of his creations could handle. Logically, this contention would lead to the conclusion that Satan would not ever successfully recruit one of God’s humans. So, then, what’s the point of going through the motions, if God knows the outcome already. To merely inflict suffering on those beings he created? If there is that tired exception of free will, and in it, the possibility that a human will choose the sin over the obedience, then again, this deity will have shown himself manipulative of the very natures he ostensible instilled in humans to begin with.
0
The Satan myth infiltrated our literature, most commonly known in a Faustian way. Faust, a closet play[2] by Johann Von Goethe, is often touted as the greatest work in German literature. In it, a devil named Mephistopheles makes a wager with God that he can sway the studious human, Faust, one of God’s favorites, away from his righteous life. Faust then makes a deal with the Devil, apparently exercising that free will I spoke of. There are, of course, striking similarities with this and the Book of Job.
0
Lost Inferno Paradise

Throughout the ages, both art and literature has informed the modern beliefs about Hell and the afterlife. Satan was blended with the idea of Lucifer through various similarities in language found in the Bible, other religious texts, and in the works of John Milton and Dante Alighieri—Paradise Lost and Divine Comedy, respectively. It is from these literary works that many Christians derive their concepts of Satan, often without conscious awareness.
“So compelling is the character of Satan in Paradise Lost,” Neil Forsyth contends. “that generations of English speakers, knowing their Milton better than their Bible, have assumed that Christianity teaches an elaborate story about the fall of the angels after a war in heaven, and have been surprised to find no mention of Satan in the Book of GEN.”[3] 
G.B. Caird echoes the sentiment: “The Bible knows nothing of the fall of Satan familiar to readers of Paradise Lost.”[4]
In Paradise Lost, Milton manages to transform the personage of Satan as an egotistical warlord. One could say that Milton actually humanizes Satan. The Dark Prince and his minions are mirrors that Milton holds up to humans. Satan becomes, then, a metaphor for the darker natures of humankind.
 
 
I’ve heard some Christians explain the problem of evil in the world by saying that God is both: good and evil, and we are representations or manifestations of this in human form. With this line of reasoning, since Satan represents evil in Christendom, then God is Satan. This is a concept, while shocking to Christians, is nonetheless in alignment with the behaviors of the vengeful, petty, petulant and volatile deity found in the Bible. The god of the Bible kills, tortures and maims while the Devil stands aside, representing nothing as ominous as the god who represents his antithesis. It is perhaps one of the greater ironies that the Christian god is less worthy of worship than the being assigned as the ultimate dark force. So, perhaps this explanation that God is both evil and good, is represented in these two beings: Satan and God. Though, one could argue that if God represents the good, he certainly didn’t take any pains to embody the part.
0
The people of ancient times could not be profoundly more ignorant than modern people, yet a certain amount if ignorance was at play. Information and education was hard to come by, and there was no instant access to it via the Internet and mass media that we enjoy today. It is easy to understand how a certain amount of ignorance gave rise to superstition and mythology. However, there are still those among us who display their atavistic ignorance with jejune pride.
Here’s an example of just how ignorant modern humans can be. If the spelling and misuse of terminology is not an indication, consider the shallow, regurgitated argument he offers:
(posted by malchus5)
 “Its no game
Heres a perspective, if the Supreme Being was playing with us ,so what are you going do about it ? If a Supreme Being created you He did it for His purpose.His purpose.God is Holy that means He can not tolerate any rebellion.Jesus said if you think it its rebellion.BUT He created a lupole. Someone to satify that holy reconpense.///////satan free will made him turn rebellious.(detail)God is good ,being all knowing their is a purpose/////////// I am sure this does not help you.” [1]
Why no, malchus5, it doesn’t help me, because helping me would require the use of a brain. Where does he get the definition of “holy” as being a state where no rebellion is allowed?
Interestingly, Malchus was the name of a slave in biblical days, whose ear was lopped off by St. Peter. So you probably can’t hear me when I say: educate yourself!
Never mind the fact that a Saint goes around cutting off the ears of slave people. Maybe Malchus was reincarnated as Vincent Van Gogh.
But I digress.
The dictionary defines “holy” as:
1. specially recognized as or declared sacred by religious use or authority.
2. dedicated or devoted to the service of God, the church, or religion: a holy man.
3. saintly; godly; pious; devout.
4. having a spiritually pure quality: a holy love.
5. entitled to worship or veneration as or as if sacred: a holy relic.
6. religious.
7. inspiring fear, awe, or grave distress.
In definition number one, this would mean that God is holy only because he declared himself holy. In definition number two, this would mean that God was devoted to the service of himself. In number three, God would be compared to himself. In number four, we run into still another contradiction: God is of course, godly. So again,t he comparison can only be made to the thing being compared with. A logical fallacy of the worst order. In definition number five, we see the first chance for a sensical relationship between God and the word, Holy; God being worthy of worship or veneration because he is holy. In number six, we lose it again, because one cannot assign the god to the condition of being religious, since a religious person worships another being, and that would mean God would worship another being, more Holy, and more godlike, than himself. Or that he would worship himself. Which leads us to definition seven: inspiring fear, awe, or grave distress. Certainly, a case could be made for God being holy by the fact that he inspires all these things.

      So, the only definition that makes any sense, is that God is only holy because he inspires fear, awe or grave distress. And this is the god that Christians choose to worship. And they seem absurdly proud of this choice.


[1] History Channel.com. Oct 14, 2002. http://boards.historychannel.com/


[1] Sheehan, Thomas. “The First Coming: How the Kingdom of God Became Christianity.”
[2]Meaning, meant to be read, but not performed.
[3]Neil Forsyth, The Satanic Epic (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003) p. 66.
[4]G.B. Caird, The Revelation (London: A. & C. Black, 1984) p. 153.
[5] History Channel.com. Oct 14, 2002. http://boards.historychannel.com/
Be the first to like.

NEAT But Not Reassuring

What were you doing on February 17, 2003?
Did you know that date was almost the end of the world?
We narrowly missed annihilation in 2003, and few knew about it.

A comet called NEAT not so neatly came close to impacting the sun. This comet was over twice the size of jupiter. A well-timed solar flare blasted it out of its trajectory orbit and so disaster was avoided.

NASA’s SOHO satellite camera caught it all on video. Go here to see the video.

For perspective, the thick dark line at the left bottom is the arm of a mechanism on the camera that holds a plate in front of the sun, to block glare, so that other objects surrounding the sun can be seen. The white circle in the center of that plate represents the size of the sun.

Now, note the large white object entering at the top-right and moving down the screen on the right. This is the NEAT comet. Compare its size to the size of the sun, and you have some idea what it means to say it’s over twice the size of Jupiter. The comet narrowly escaped impact with the sun due to that solar flare–or as the scientists call it, CME (Coronal Mass Ejection).

There are at least a thousand comets that orbit the sun, 160 of those that are near enough to be seen via telescope.

So. In 2003, we were all facing the end of the world, and most of us didn’t even know.

Be the first to like.

New Videos of Supernatural Hypocrisy

SH_vol2_COC_11Feb11frcvr1FINAL2_138x212
I have posted a widget to show my videos of my 6-volume book,
Supernatural Hypocrisy: The Cognitive Dissonance of a God Cosmology
on my blog for that project–the other blog is at the link.
I hope it will be a more accessible way for those busy-bees among us to enjoy the content.
As for the book itself, it has become such a Magnum Opus. I am considering breaking it into several volumes. But even if I do that, it is still taking more time than i like to complete. The reference section alone is up to 20 pages.
So I have some decisions to make and more work to do. But in the meantime, i will post these videos which are taken from the completed portions of the book, and hope that they might enlighten, explain, or otherwise inform those who wish to know more about the process of purposeful loss of religion.
And who knows, maybe I’ll get a few crackpots who wish me all manner of flesh-burning in their loving God’s hell. Won’t that be fun?

Be the first to like.

Kindred Molecules, Deja Vu, and Noosphere

There are people we meet who seem to be immediately familiar…these familiars are somewhat vexing, in that it often doesn’t make much sense why you are drawn to certain people and feel like they are part of your molecules, somehow.Whatever that little cosmic thing is that seems to be going on somewhere under the radar…I seriously believe in the concept of Kindreds. I rarely have that sense with people, but I have been enjoying that connection with a new one–Tanya. I feel a connection with Tanya that defies logic. We haven’t seen each other in 30 years. But I have seen her, 30 years ago. In High School. She’s in the back of my consciousness somewhere. And even then, I was drawn to her, and my immature brain may have completely misunderstood what that connection was. So combine that with the current interaction we’ve had in phone calls, emails, texting, photos…and maybe our brains just fill in those extra parts where they are supposed to go. The brain does this with memories as a matter of course, but I wonder if it can do it on this other level, where the stuff that gets filled in isn’t memory, unless it’s cellular or on some cosmic level we have yet to understand…
She recently dreamed she and I were talking and I was wearing a blue striped shirt. She asked if I had one. I sent her a picture of the only one I owned, and she said that was just like the one in the dream. She thought it was freaky and spoke of other times when she has dreamed things and they appeared later in her life…felt a little like deja vu when we have moments like that, she said. And I agree that it’s odd–when we seem to tap into something beyond our normal comprehension.
My friend Justice believes in the collective consciousness, and she says that’s where it comes from. I like the idea of the Collective Consciousness (AKA Noosphere, Universal Mind, Cosmic Consciousness, Collective Unconscious, Akashic Record, etc). It’s similar to the concepts I’ve been exploring in my book, Quintessence… although not about this specifically, it is about the idea of Alternate Realities, the Unified Field, and what if DNA can find copies of itself in other alternate realities. What if the same is true for Kindred Molecules? What if there’s some beacon that can pick these things up, that science has not discovered yet? What can we really know for sure about the Noosphere? I don’t know. But fascinating to think about.Back to deja vu. I do think that it falls into a category of neuroscience, most of the time–people believe essentially what they need or want to believe, and it gets embellished until it’s an outright lie. I’ve been guilty of that. I realized this most recently in an experience while walking on a golf course on the evening of 4th of July. In realizing that I had taken an accidental picture that looked mysterious, my brain started on that tangent and I wondered if I took a bunch of those types of photos, and then posted a blog with a bunch of B.S. in it, packaged to look like the real thing–how many people would fall for it. About 75% FELL FOR IT. You know who fell for it? The Christian, religious and/or highly spiritual people. They already have the tendency well in place, you see, to swallow whatever seems mysterious as something… MYSTERIOUS. Which means they are ripe for the picking, and don’t use their reason enough.I am reading this book (one of many on my nightstand that I read in turns) called The ‘God’ Part of the Brain. In it, the author explains his quest for his own cosmology (much like my cosmology book, but a different genre) and apparently, there is something about the human brain that inherently wants to believe in things that are not true.One example, from just today. Each time I got up from my desk to go refill my coffee or some other household errand in another room, I noticed that the light was on in my closet. I had turned it off before that. This happened repeatedly, and I had this little moment…that moment that happens in the primitive portions of our brains that wants the mysterious to stay mysterious… wherein I ALMOST thought there was something MYSTERIOUS happening. Then my rational mind kicked in and I reminded myself of how I had gone into that closet about 20 times that day, since it’s as much storage as closet. I had just not consciously noticed leaving the light on each time. I only notice it when I get up and am facing the open door and see the light in this otherwise dim room. Contrast is part of that explanation. I don’t notice leaving it on, because I’m walking OUT of the light. My eyes are sensitive to light, and I only notice when it hits my eyes, and they have to adjust. Perfectly rational, plausible, and HONEST. Nothing mysterious there.
In storage recently, I came across another photo that spoke to this very concept, and used myself as the guinea pig. I took a photo of a UFO when I was a kid, and when I revisited this photo and the story surrounding it, realized I had fabricated the whole thing. I WANTED TO SEE A UFO and so I saw one. But just like the photos of the light worms on the golf course, it was created by moving the camera while taking a picture, resulting in the dragging of a light source into a glowing object. It took a great deal of honesty to admit that to myself. It had started as a weird photo I didn’t understand, and it had then morphed into the thought of UFO’s, and then, over the years, I continued to lie to myself in increments, to the point where I believed it. The memory was so distant– and I hadn’t seen the photo in so long. Finding the photo in storage, it reiterated the situation with the post about the glowing night worms. This photo had the same glowing effect on it. And it was not due to something in the sky. It was an error in the photography, and a glitch in my human software. The glitch that has us believing the lies we tell ourselves. Until we can all nip that in the bud before 30 years go by–like the minute we do it–we will always be subject to the machination of the psyche, and all it’s variant bad sectors on the Human Hard Disk. What was I talking about? Oh yeah. Deja Vu. (I have had just as many experiences with what (I think George Carlin) called Vuja De–which is the sensation that no one else has ever had this experience, ever. lol). There are many things that science has yet to explain… or prove…one of those is the concept of a Collective Consciousness.
Justice believes that’s where she gets her psychic information. I can’t say. All I know is, she seems to have this gift for knowing things I can’t find any explanation for. So yes. THAT’S a mystery. Science doesn’t know yet, what that’s about. I’ve had many experiences myself about knowing things I “shouldn’t” know. First memory of that which sticks with me is when I knew Elvis was dead before they announced it. I was sitting in the living room watching soaps (back when I had only 3 wrinkles in my brain, and didn’t know any better) and a bulletin came on with a little splash screen. Just a nondescript logo on the screen, Nothing else. I turned and called to my Female Parental Unit, who was in the kitchen, saying, “Mom! Elvis died!” She came rushing in, wiping her hands on a dish towel, and said “What?” About that time, the announcer came on…stuttering, “Elvis Presley…has…died…” I’m sure my mother didn’t know that my shock at that moment was not about the death of Elvis, but the realization that I knew about it a few seconds before they said anything.

And over the years, I have known other things. (As I’m sure many people have). Some simple, like knowing the phone was going to ring–I’d reach for it to answer, and realize it wasn’t ringing. And then it would ring in my hand. Or knowing what people were going to say in movie dialogue, and saying it right along with them, when I had never seen the movie.

I wonder if any of you have had this experience, or do it on a regular basis: you are listening to someone talk–whether on an audio book, on television, the radio, or in person–and in your mind, you are following along with them in perfect unison, as if they are talking from your head….I’m sure there is a scientific explanation for that, having to do with how the brain works….but i find it interesting…

Sorry, DIGRESSION.

Also–these other examples of connection–I’m sure many people have had this experience–I would think about Justi, and tell her, mentally, to call me, and within a few minutes, she would. I can’t explain those things, but it’s obvious there is something “out there” we don’t fully understand yet, and it does seem mysterious.

Anyway, I’m curious about my connection with Tanya, as I’ve rarely felt it with anyone else… It’s a different species….I’m not sure I can put my finger on it….she is an oddity. (I mean that in the most loving way…I’m an oddity, too). It’s like I feel I know her much like I know myself…maybe that’s  just a load of malarkey. Maybe it’s just that we see eye to eye on so many things….and yet, that doesn’t make much sense; we’ve had two completely different life paths, and yet arrived at most of the same conclusions. Maybe we’re just a higher degree of kindred. But this is partly why I am so anxious to spend some face-time with her. I want to know what that’s all about.

I want to learn more about the noosphere.

Be the first to like.

Satan believes in God, therefore God exists

From Mothrust.com, the following delightful exchange.

Apparently I do believe in God, I just won’t admit to it. One cocky seventeen year old fellow, Micah Sonatra, (Deven Hoffpauir, with his truly kitschy myspace) who I thought was a middle-aged lady, said that it was obvious God existed because even Lucifer believes in God – that was the crux of his argument. What the..! Stating that one imaginary character exists because another imaginary character believes it exists is like saying, “Of course Santa Clause is real, heck… even the tooth fairy knows that”.
——-

-
Sonatra: You see, you have no case. This is your case and still you think you have a case. This isn’t about wheter or not God exists. You know God exists.

Umm… no, but I think it absolutely amazing that you think you can tell people what they believe. No, I don’t believe there is a god and you telling me that I do isn’t going to change that. I don’t believe there’s a bogeyman under my bed.

Sonatra: The God you guys apparently don’t believe in, yet still feel the need to mock – a God you believe doesn’t exist

I can’t speak for everybody else, but I think I’m mocking your beliefs and possibly you personally, not the imaginary friend you play with.

Sonatra: To see that no matter how much I care about monsters, I can’t save them.

Ahhh, such a flatterer… you could love your enemies, or simply call them names.

Sonatra: and I will now take my leave. Take heed, for punishment draws near, wheter you belive in it or not. Just because you don’t believe in a sword, doesn’t mean it isn’t there.

Are you really gonna leave? ’cause you said something like that about 12 posts ago when you said you aren’t to throw your pearls to swine. My invisible pink unicorn keeps me safe from invisible swords, so I’ll be fine I think. It really is cringey when Christians start talking in Ye Olde English.

Sonatra: Goodbye, I have said all that is required of me to say.

If any of those other little voices in your head tell you to do anything involving swords, knives or weaponry again, could you do your neighbours a favour and drive out into the desert immediately.

_______________________
from http://www.mothrust.com/2007/04/satan-believes-in-god-therefore-god.html

Be the first to like.

Must-Reads for Modern Fiction & Non-Fiction

[cross-posted from my other blogs, due to some content being atheistic in nature]

*I present my list (which continues to get larger) of books I feel are more than worth the time to read…these are based on my own opinions and preferences, and yours may vary. But check them out just in case there’s a gem in there for you.1. One Door Away From Heaven (Dean Koontz)
[I think this is Koontz's best book).

Amazon.com Review

Dean Koontz virtually invented the cross-genre novel, and in One Door Away from Heaven he mixes an action thriller with post-X-Files alien paranoia to remarkable effect. Micky Bellsong is a young woman at a crisis point in her life, using a stay at her Aunt Geneva's to sort things out. Then the precocious and deformed Leilani Klonk walks into her life, telling stories of her stepfather and drugged-up mother, who believe aliens will beam the girl into their mothership and heal her deformities before her 10th birthday. But tales of the stepfather's vicious past, including his hand in several murders, leave Micky believing that a far more terrible fate awaits her friend. So when the parents take off with Leilani, Micky pursues.

As is typical with a Koontz novel, nothing turns out to be what it seems, and the meticulously crafted plot tightens like a noose with every turn of the page. His characters are exceptionally drawn, driving the novel forward with realism and warmth. Micky is one of his more attractive young heroines, but the real star is Leilani, a mature young girl whose plucky nature and sparkling dialogue instantly make her Koontz's most memorable creation. She embodies his belief that despite violence, pain, and suffering, there is always goodness to be found in every person and situation. Koontz has once again proven why he is one of the premier novelists of his generation. --Jonathan Weir, Amazon.co.uk

From Publishers Weekly

Koontz's latest is powered by an impassioned stand against utilitarian bioethics, and it's chock-a-block with trademark characters vulnerable kids, nurturing parental substitutes, a dog of above-average intelligence and a villain of insuperable nastiness sure to provoke a pleasurable conditioned response from his readers. The discursive story coalesces from two converging subplots steeped in the weirdness of fringe ufology: in one, loser Michelina Bellsong struggles to save crippled nine-year-old Leilani Klonk from an evil stepdad planning to pass off her imminent disposal as a benevolent alien abduction; in the other, a strange boy who goes by the alias Curtis Hammond is the quarry of two cross-country manhunts, one led by the FBI and the other by mass murderers who, like the messianic Curtis, may not be what they seem. En route to a pyrotechnic finale in rural Idaho, Koontz shoots bull's-eyes at target issues that shape his theme, including assisted suicide, substance abuse, the irresponsibility of the counterculture and the goofiness of true-believer ET enthusiasts. Koontz's once form-fitting style has gotten baggy of late, however, and readers may find themselves wishing he had better filtered the flights of fancy his characters sometimes indulge at chapter length. For all that, the novel is surprisingly focused on its inspirational message "we are the instruments of one another's salvation and only by the hope that we give to others do we lift ourselves out of the darkness into light" and conveys it with such conviction that only the most critical will demur. (Dec. 26)Forecast: A terrific cover, depicting two female figures on a country path beneath a star-filled night sky, will alert browsers to the awe and mystery within the novel; Koontz's name and Bantam's promo machine will do the rest. Koontz could hit #1 with this one.

2. Another Day in the Frontal Lobe: A brain Surgeon Exposes Life on the Inside (Katrina Firlik, M.D.)

From Publishers Weekly

The brain is my business," says Connecticut neurosurgeon Firlik. "Many of the brains I encounter have been pushed around by tumors, blood clots, infections, or strokes that have swollen out of control. Some have been invaded by bullets, nails, or even maggots." In these pages, a carpenter with a nail in his left frontal lobe goes home within a day of surgery; a boy develops a raging bacterial meningitis because his New Age mother gave him herbs instead of antibiotics for a routine ear infection; and an infant with hydranencephaly looks cute despite the absence of brain matter in his skull. Along the way, Firlik muses that a healthy brain has the consistency of soft tofu, and she flies solo in the OR for the first time as she saves an 18-year-old victim of a car accident who didn't buckle up. A woman in a male-dominated specialty, Firlik doesn't get worked up over minor things that can be construed as sexist; she finds that handling a patient's anxiety can be more complicated than the surgery itself, and she expects to be sued someday for malpractice. This witty and lucid first book demythologizes a complex medical specialty for those of us who aren't brain surgeons. (On sale May 2)

From Bookmarks Magazine

Katrina Firlik shatters the myth most of us hold of brain surgeons as superheroes: they're merely masters of the trade. Critics agreed that her engaging, witty insight into the profession, her layperson's explanation of complex medical terms and routine surgeries, and her compelling stories more than overshadowed the blood-and-gore factor. A few critics expressed disappointment that Firlik only touched on her challenges as a woman in the field, particularly as the first woman admitted to University of Pittsburgh Medical Center's neurosurgery residency program. Others noted some self-indulgent tangents, though she amply covers her personal inspirations. Overall, Another Day provides a fascinating look into the oh-so-routine practices brain surgeons face daily.

3. Forbidden Knowledge: From Prometheus to Pornography (Roger Shattuck )

Amazon.com Review

An intellectual tour-de-force, Forbidden Knowledge is a study of the ethics of literary and scientific inquiry. Shattuck first approaches his subject indirectly, conducting an engaging tour of Western literature: Adam and Eve, Prometheus, Milton's Paradise Lost, Goethe's Faust, and Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. He then uses these tales to address the moral questions raised by mankind's tendency to search for dangerous knowledge. He contrasts J. Robert Oppenheimer's acceptance of guilt for the atomic bombings with Edward Teller's dismissal of the same. In his own field of literary criticism he argues against the neutral analysis of immoral works as "pure literature," illustrating his point with a critique of the Marquis de Sade. Forbidden Knowledge is a stimulating and forceful intellectual argument against moral relativism, as well as a practical approach to difficult ethical problems, from genetic engineering to pornography.

From Publishers Weekly

In this scholarly, provocative and gracefully written study, Shattuck?a distinguished critic (The Banqueting Years) and translator (of Apollinaire)?argues that there are moral taboos (even if they are sometimes unclearly defined) that we dare violate at our peril, that there are indeed limits?both philosophical and physical?to what humankind is meant to know and experience and that from the very beginnings of civilization, a central theme in our thought and literature has been the struggle to understand what those limits are. The book begins in theory and moves to more concrete examples of "forbidden knowledge," from discussions of myths (Prometheus, Orpheus, Adam and Eve), through the Victorians' perplexity over Darwin, to an examination of works of literature (Faust, Paradise Lost, Billy Budd, Frankenstein, Emily Dickinson's poetry, Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, The Stranger) that indicate a fascination or concern with those limits. The second half of this study focuses on what Shattuck calls case histories of what can happen when those limits are pushed and include discussions of the Manhattan Project, DNA research, genetic engineering, serial killers (Ted Bundy; the so-called Moors Murderer) and finally?and at great length?the Marquis de Sade. The book might seem but a thoughtful warning about the destructive power of de Sade and what Shattuck considers sadistic pornography, but a concluding essay makes it clear that his subject is really the history of human curiosity and of the glories and dangers inherent in trying to learn more than one is prepared for. First serial to the New York Times Book Review; Reader's Subscription Book Club main selection; BOMC and History Book Club alternates.

4. The God Delusion (Richard Dawkins)

From Publishers Weekly

The antireligion wars started by Daniel Dennett and Sam Harris will heat up even more with this salvo from celebrated Oxford biologist Dawkins. For a scientist who criticizes religion for its intolerance, Dawkins has written a surprisingly intolerant book, full of scorn for religion and those who believe. But Dawkins, who gave us the selfish gene, anticipates this criticism. He says it's the scientist and humanist in him that makes him hostile to religions—fundamentalist Christianity and Islam come in for the most opprobrium—that close people's minds to scientific truth, oppress women and abuse children psychologically with the notion of eternal damnation. While Dawkins can be witty, even confirmed atheists who agree with his advocacy of science and vigorous rationalism may have trouble stomaching some of the rhetoric: the biblical Yahweh is "psychotic," Aquinas's proofs of God's existence are "fatuous" and religion generally is "nonsense." The most effective chapters are those in which Dawkins calms down, for instance, drawing on evolution to disprove the ideas behind intelligent design. In other chapters, he attempts to construct a scientific scaffolding for atheism, such as using evolution again to rebut the notion that without God there can be no morality. He insists that religion is a divisive and oppressive force, but he is less convincing in arguing that the world would be better and more peaceful without it. (Oct. 18)

From Scientific American

Richard Dawkins, in The God Delusion, tells of his exasperation with colleagues who try to play both sides of the street: looking to science for justification of their religious convictions while evading the most difficult implications—the existence of a prime mover sophisticated enough to create and run the universe, "to say nothing of mind reading millions of humans simultaneously." Such an entity, he argues, would have to be extremely complex, raising the question of how it came into existence, how it communicates —through spiritons!—and where it resides. Dawkins is frequently dismissed as a bully, but he is only putting theological doctrines to the same kind of scrutiny that any scientific theory must withstand. No one who has witnessed the merciless dissection of a new paper in physics would describe the atmosphere as overly polite.
~George Johnson is author of Fire in the Mind: Science, Faith, and the Search for Order and six other books. He resides on the Web at talaya.net

5. The Bible
(yes, the Bible. But Cover to cover, without any help. Just read it all. And don't lie and say you have--most HAVEN'T, especially Christians. For myself, as anyone who knows me understands, my spiritual path was halted by reading the Bible. By the time i got to the end, i was an atheist. Amazing what the clergy will hide form you. It's worth your time to really read it, cover to cover. I don't have any reviews to place below here, as that would be a bit absurd, considering. But a review, of sorts, will be had in my book about this journey, Supernatural Hypocrisy: The Cognitive Dissonance of a God Cosmology, hopefully available by the end of this year).

 

 

6. Maximum Ride series (James Patterson) The Angel Experiment, Book 1
*you won't often catch me reading Young Adult fiction at this age...but I'm telling you, I could not resist these. Each one, just as compelling and entertaining as the last.

From Publishers Weekly

Themes from Patterson's popular adult titles When the Wind Blows and The Lake House waft through this YA thriller, the author's first in the genre. Wood stars as Maximum Ride, 14-year-old leader of a band of kids who have escaped the lab where they were bred as 98% human and 2% bird (wings being a key component) and developed a variety of other-worldly talents. In Patterson's unusual universe, Max and her young cohorts are soon forced to rescue one of their own—a girl named Angel—from a pack of mutant wolf-humans called Erasers. Wood nails Patterson's often adult-beyond-their-years dialogue with a jaded tone. But the result of this pairing makes Max sound more off-putting than cool or intriguing. The listening experience is stalled in the starting gate, keeping the action-adventure earthbound rather than high-flying. Ages 12-up. (Apr.)

From School Library Journal

Grade 7 Up–A group of genetically enhanced kids who can fly and have other unique talents are on the run from part-human, part-wolf predators called Erasers in this exciting SF thriller that's not wholly original but is still a compelling read. Max, 14, and her adopted family–Fang and Iggy, both 13, Nudge, 11, Gazzy, 8, and Angel, 6–were all created as experiments in a lab called the School. Jeb, a sympathetic scientist, helped them escape and, since then, they've been living on their own. The Erasers have orders to kill them so the world will never find out they exist. Max's old childhood friend, Ari, now an Eraser leader, tracks them down, kidnaps Angel, and transports her back to the School to live like a lab rat again. The youngsters are forced to use their special talents to rescue her as they attempt to learn about their pasts and their destinies. The novel ends with the promise that this journey will continue in the sequel. As with Patterson's adult mystery thrillers, in-depth characterization is secondary to the fast-moving plot. The narrative alternates between Max's first-person point-of-view and that of the others in the third person, but readers don't get to know Max very well. The only major flaw is that the children sound like adults most of the time. This novel is reminiscent of David Lubar's Hidden Talents (Tor, 1999) and Ann Halam's Dr. Franklin's Island (Random, 2002).–Sharon Rawlins, Piscataway Public Library, NJ

*we interrupt this booklist for an important announcement. I thought the above byline was from Pissedaway Public Library. Until i looked at it again. I'm sure i Pissed Away many hours at the libray in my lifetime. Okay, not Pissed away. It was time well spent.

We now return to your regularly scheduled Booklist, already in progress....

7. The Dictionary of Cultural Literacy by James Trefil, Joseph F. Kett, and E. D. Hirsch

From School Library Journal

This book belongs in high-school libraries, if only because of the tremendous amount of publicity and controversy surrounding its compilation. It has large gaps in minority literature and history, but in other areas it is fascinating in its coverage. Adults will enjoy browsing to find what is included and what's not, while students will appreciate the quick reference.
Copyright 1989 Reed Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

Product Description

A National bestseller, The Dictionary of Cultural Literacy has been widely acclaimed for identifying and defining the core body of knowledge that no literare American should be without. Now in this newly revised and updated edition, the authors provice a comprehensive look at cultural literacy for the nineties. New entries reflect suggestions from hundreds of readers. The dictionary takes into account the growing consensus over the specifics of multiculturalism, the political and geographic changes in the world, and the new ideas and terms that flow constantly from scientific research and technological development. The Dictionary of Cultural Literacy challenges us to find out more about what we know and helps us make sense of what we read, hear, and learn. It is a "must have" book for every home.

8. Everything You Know About God Is Wrong: The Disinformation Guide to Religion (Russ Kick, Neil Gaiman, and Richard Dawkins)

Product Description

In the new mega-anthology from best-selling editor Russ Kick, more than fifty writers, reporters, and researchers invade the inner sanctum for an unrestrained look at the wild and woolly world of organized belief.

Richard Dawkins shows us the strange, scary properties of religion; Neil Gaiman turns a biblical atrocity story into a comic (that almost sent a publisher to prison); Erik Davis looks at what happens when religion and California collide; Mike Dash eyes stigmatics; Douglas Rushkoff exposes the trouble with Judaism; Paul Krassner reveals his "Confessions of an Atheist"; and best-selling lexicographer Jonathon Green interprets the language of religious prejudice.

Among the dozens of other articles and essays, you'll find: a sweeping look at classical composers and Great American Songbook writers who were unbelievers, such as Irving Berlin, creator of "God Bless America"; the definitive explanation of why America is not a Christian nation; the bizarre, Catholic-fundamentalist books by Mel Gibson's father; eye-popping photos of bizarre religious objects and ceremonies, including snake-handlers and pot-smoking children; the thinly veiled anti-Semitism in the Left Behind novels; an extract from the rare, suppressed book The Sex Life of Brigham Young; and rarely seen anti-religious writings from Mark Twain and H.G. Wells.

Further topics include exorcisms, religious curses, Wicca, the Church of John Coltrane, crimes by clergy, death without God, Christian sex manuals, the "ex-gay" movement, failed prophecies, bizarre theology, religious bowling, atheist rock and roll, "how to be a good Christian," an entertaining look at the best (and worst) books on religion, and much more.

About the Author

Russ Kick is the all-star editor of five previous Disinformation Guides and three Disinformation books. He has been labeled as an "information archaeologist" by the New York Times in a major profile. He runs the popular blog TheMemoryHole.org and is well known for his intelligent and successful FOIA requests and unveilings.

9. Letter to a Christian Nation (Sam Harris)

Reviews

“A breath of fresh fire.”–Wall Street Journal

"This combination of ruthless argument with polemic designed to provoke (he describes the Catholic Church as the “institution that has produced and sheltered an elite army of child-molesters") will further delight Harris’ supporters and infuriate his critics.” – San Francisco Chronicle

“Harris has consolidated his disdain for religion in a withering attack on Christianity, delivered in the form of an open letter. . . . Mr. Harris wants to grab your lapels and give you a good shake. . . [he] makes a good case for a new and intellectually honest conversation about morality and human suffering.”–NY Observer

“As infidels go, Harris is an astonishingly successful one. . . Letter is a readable, exhortatory screed.”–Newsweek

“Bracing.”–The Nation

“[Letter to a Christian Nation] crackles with a focused, potent energy. . . . [Harris’] arguments resonate with a satisfying common sense.”–Contra Costa Times

“Sam Harris’s elegant little book is most refreshing and a wonderful source of ammunition for those who, like me, hold to no religious doctrine. Yet I have some sympathy also with those who might be worried by his uncompromising stance. Read it and from your own view, but do not ignore its message.”
–Sir Roger Penrose, emeritus professor of mathematics, Oxford University, author of The Road to Reality

“Reading Harris’ Letter to a Christian Nation was like sitting ring side, cheering the champion, yelling ‘Yes!’ at every jab. For those of us who feel depressed by this country’s ever increasing unification of church and state, and the ever decreasing support for the sciences that deliver knowledge and reduce ignorance …

“A breath of fresh fire.” —Wall Street Journal

“I dare you to read this book…it will not leave you unchanged. Read it if it is the last thing you do.” —Richard Dawkins, author of The Selfish Gene and The God Delusion

“It’s a shame that not everyone in this country will read Sam Harris’ marvelous little book Letter to a Christian Nation. They won’t but they should.” —Leonard Susskind, Felix Bloch Professor in theoretical physics, Stanford University

10. Atheism: The Case against God (George H. Smith)

Product Description

With this intriguing introduction, George H Smith sets out to demolish what he considers the most widespread and destructive of all the myths devised by man – the concept of a supreme being. With painstaking scholarship and rigorous arguments, Mr. Smith examines, dissects, and refutes the myriad “proofs” offered by theists – the defenses of sophisticated, professional theologians, as well as the average religious layman. He explores the historical and psychological havoc wrought by religion in general – and concludes that religious belief cannot have any place in the life of modern, rational man.

Review

Is theism a reasonable and rational position, or can a better case be made for atheism and against faith in the existence of gods? The goal of George Smith’s books is to demonstrate that irrational beliefs are in fact harmful and that theism and religion are prime examples of irrationality. The conclusion, then, is that both must be abandoned and new ways of thinking about the world adopted in their place.

The first place he starts is, naturally enough, to define what atheism is. This he does well, explaining the difference between “weak” atheism, which is simply the lack of belief in any gods, and “strong” atheism, which is the outright denial that any gods exist (he uses the less common terms “implicit” and “explicit”). This is the definition which most atheists today understand, which atheists have been using for the past couple of hundred years, and which is attested to in most major, unabridged dictionaries.

But the heart of Smith’s book is his discussion about reason vs. faith. According to Smith, reason and faith are two ways of thinking which are diametrically opposed to each other. His explanation of the nature of “reasonable” thinking is very good, and something which most people should read.

Reason isn’t simply one “mode” of thinking, or one possible choice out of a variety of equally valid options. Reason is, instead, our very ability to think in abstract, complex ways. Similarly, rational demonstration is not simply one way to demonstrate something, but rather it is the ability to demonstrate anything at all. The denial of reason is thus the denial of our basic ability to think coherently about our lives.

This in turn is contrasted with faith – but here his argument breaks down somewhat. The perception is given that he is making an argument which is valid against all forms of faith and thus all forms of theism, but this is mistaken on two accounts.

First, what he says does not apply to all the ways in which people – even religious people – understand the nature of faith. It is true that it is valid against the usual way in which you will see a religious person using it, and particularly in the way which Christians use it. Because of this, his discussion will be very useful on a practical level, and what he says, when limited properly, is very accurate: “Insofar as faith is possible, it is irrational; insofar as faith is rational, it is impossible.”

It is undeniable that a defense of reason is probably the best argument against the “faith” many religionists promote; but in not making it clear that this is one of many ways to understand “faith,” he makes an error similar to that of religionists who claim that if the atheist has “faith” in a spouse or in the sun rising tomorrow, then that is equivalent to the theist’s faith in their god.

A second error is in the premise that all forms of theism are equivalent – further compounded by the exclusive use of Christianity as the theistic foil for his arguments. Not all theists necessarily resort to “faith” in the way he describes – some refuse to use it at all and insist that their beliefs can be defended with reason alone. They may be mistaken in their belief that they would be successful, but that doesn’t change the fact that an assault on one type of faith is not the same as an assault on all forms of faith and all forms of theism.

To a degree, Smith seems to understand this, because he devotes a significant portion of the book to refutations of common attempts to provide rational arguments for the existence of gods. Although these rebuttals are limited because they do not take into account more recent formulations, they do provide a clear, understandable introduction to them and how to go about dealing with them.

All of the book’s problems stem, I think, from the question of theory vs. practice. In practice, most atheists will encounter Christians making the sort of faith-based arguments Smith describes and refutes. Because of this, his book is very good and very useful. But in theory, an atheist could easily encounter theists and religions who make different arguments, and the atheist will look foolish trying to formulate rebuttals to positions which the theist does not hold.

Unfortunately, this isn’t just speculation – I see it happen all the time that atheists essentially construct straw man arguments against principles which are associated with Christianity and particular ideas of faith, only based on learning that a person is a theist or is a Christian. The chief reason is, I am sure, because they don’t often encounter different sorts of theists and because they are most familiar with Christianity. Even worse, some atheist books contribute to the problem when they could be working to eliminate it.

And Smith’s book isn’t alone in this – not by a long shot. Most of the atheist books out there may start out with a more general discussion about the nature of atheism and broad considerations about general beliefs in the existence of gods, but few stick with just those arguments. Most end up attacking Christianity in the end – understandable, for the practical reasons I describe above, but ultimately problematic.

Too many atheists are simply ignorant of the variety of ways in which theists defend their beliefs, and while educating them about Christian arguments is a good idea, it is self-defeating to only focus on Christianity. It is also self-defeating to mix up anti-Christian arguments with anti-theism arguments, without making the clear distinction between the two. A true “Case Against God” book would not spend much time on Christianity-only arguments, but instead would have left that to a second volume entitled “The Case Against Christianity.”

Nevertheless, this book still provides a sound introduction to atheism – what it is, what it is not, and how it can be effectively defended against the most common critiques. It also provides a basis for atheists to critique religious faith and common theistic arguments, so long as they keep in mind the limitations described above. ~Austin Cline, Guide at atheism.about.com

10. God Game (Andrew M. Greeley)

Product Description

Andrew M. Greeley, the phenomenally popular novelist and priest, is best known — and loved — for his understated Catholic morality and compassionate understanding of human foibles. In The God Game, now available in a brand-new trade paperback edition, Father Greeley takes a new and fascinating twist on an old cliché: What if — by using a sophisticated computer game with a healthy dose of heavenly intervention — you really could play God? What if you actually had the power to control other people’s lives?

This is the dilemma that faces our hero, who quickly finds that being given the kingdom, the power, and the glory is dangerous–but addictive. The troubles of the people he sees flashing on his computer screen are all too real–and his troubles are just beginning. . .

About the Author

A native of Chicago, Reverend Andrew M. Greeley, is a priest, distinguished sociologist and bestselling author. He is professor of social sciences at the University of Chicago and the University of Arizona, as well as Research Associate at the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago. His current sociological research focuses on current issues facing the Catholic Church-including celibacy of priests, ordination of women, religious imagination, and sexual behavior of Catholics.

Father Greeley received the S.T.L. in 1954 from St. Mary of Lake Seminary. His graduate work was done at the University of Chicago, where he received the M.A. Degree in 1961 and the Ph.D. in 1962.

Father Greeley has written scores of books and hundreds of popular and scholarly articles on a variety of issues in sociology, education and religion. His column on political, church and social issues is carried by the carried by the Chicago Sun Times and may other newspapers. He stimulates discussion of neglected issues and often anticipates sociological trends. He is the author of more than thirty bestselling novels and an autobiography, Furthermore!: Confessions of a Parish Priest.

 

11. That’s Not in My American History Book: A Compilation of Little-Known Events & Forgotten Heroes (Thomas Ayres)

That’s Not in My American History Book collects an illuminating treasury of stories edited out of your textbooks. It explains why the Fourth of July isn’t really our Independence Day. It dispels the myth of Paul Revere’s ride. It reveals nineteenth-century political mudslinging that labeled Andrew Jackson a murderer and his wife an adulteress. It even unveils the only vice president ever to compose a number-one pop hit.
For generations, history classes reduced the American story into a dry litany of dates, names, and places. Now, Thomas Ayres fills in the gaps, supplying the messy details, reclaiming the overlooked heroes, and correcting the facts you thought you knew. With insight, irreverence, and wit, That’s Not in My American History Book uncovers our unknown past.

12. The Greatest Stories Never Told: 100 Tales from History to Astonish, Bewilder, and Stupefy (Rick Beyer)

Reviews

“Full of tasty morsels.A delightful book to arm one for the next dull cocktail party.” (Chicago Tribune )

“History like you’ve never read it before.Amusing.” (The Tennessean )

“100 stories you haven’t heard will delight in knowing..Lively, offbeat and surprising in quick-hit snippets.” (Denver Rocky Mountain News )

“Surprising.the essentials of fascinating stories are here.” (Dallas Morning News )

Product Description

History isn’t always made by great armies colliding or by great civilizations rising or falling. Sometimes it’s made when a chauffeur takes a wrong turn, a scientist forgets to clean up his lab, or a drunken soldier gets a bit rowdy. That’s the kind of history you’ll find in The Greatest Stories Never Told.

This is history candy — the good stuff. Here are 100 tales to astonish, bewilder, and stupefy: more than two thousand years of history filled with courage, cowardice, hope, triumph, sex, intrigue, folly, humor, and ambition. It’s a historical delight and a visual feast with hundreds of photographs, drawings, and maps that bring each story to life. A new discovery waits on every page: stories that changed the course of history and stories that affected what you had for breakfast this morning.

Consider:

* The Pilgrims landed on Plymouth Rock because they ran out of beer
* Some Roman officials were so corrupt that they actually stole time itself
* Three cigars changed the course of the Civil War
* The Scottish kilt was invented by an Englishman

Based on the popular Timelab 2000® history minutes hosted by Sam Waterston on The History Channel®, this collection of fascinating historical tidbits will have you shaking your head in wonder and disbelief. But they’re all true. And you’ll soon find yourself telling them to your friends.

13. Borrowed Lives (Laramie Dunaway) first published in the UK as “Wicked Women”

From Publishers Weekly

Written in a frisky, wisecracking style, Dunaway’s second novel (after Hungry Women ) kicks off smartly when good friends Luna Devon (a timid, lackluster graduate student) and Wren Caldwell (a clever, outspoken, gorgeous budding writer) both get shot by a crazed, suicidal pal. Only Luna survives. with a bullet hole in her chest. Boldly deciding to change her ho-hum life, Luna gathers Wren’s brilliant literary efforts, responds to Wren’s job offers and reinvents herself as a brainy journalist for a trendy California magazine. As Wren, she finds that the sassier her act, the bigger the payoff. Assigned to interview jailed husband-killer Season Dougherty, she becomes Season’s ally and lands a fat contract to script her story for Hollywood. Playing on her borrowed name and credentials, she breezes into an affair with the amiable Davis Richard, himself a chaser of filmworthy stories. As her adventures as Wren hilariously pile up, Luna begins to see her criminally scripted double life as the stuff of movies, especially when she gets the surprise package of her pilfered identity–the arrival of dead Wren’s shady, handsome ex-con husband, Byron, who is all too ready to go along with the scam. Blending a wealth of entertaining, good-humored tough talk with a rugged and ready sexuality, Dunaway keeps this romp of a novel moving with dexterity and panache. A snappy denouement shows Luna, having played Wren to the hilt, now primed to reenter her own life bolder and wiser. This is the first title in Warner’s new Fresh Voices Program, which aims to publish quality fiction by unsung writers. Literary Guild and Doubleday Book Club alternates.
Copyright 1992 Reed Business Information, Inc. –This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

Product Description

Luna Devon is at a crossroads in her life when she and her good friend Wren Caldwell—a clever, outspoken, gorgeous, budding writer—are shot by a crazed, suicidal pal. When Wren perishes, the timid, lackluster, graduate student Luna survives with a hole in her heart and decides to reinvent herself . . . as Wren. Luna thinks she has it made after taking the job her friend has landed sight unseen at a hot new California magazine; yet if Wren’s life offers a bed of roses, it certainly has its thorns. With moxie, pizzazz, gutsiness, and fingers crossed, Luna will try her best, even if it means pursuing her happiness with a group of ecological terrorists, a floating high-stakes chess game run by a hoodlum named Grudge, her anthropologist father who has taken a preteen Indian medicine woman for his new wife, and a man who wants what may be impossible—for Wren to be herself.

* * *

Jae: I have often aspired to produce writing like this in my novels. I can’t say enough about how thoroughly enjoyable and addictive this writing is. I must instead show you by giving you an excerpt from the opening pages…

“When i finally arrived at the police station, Wren was standing on the front steps under a bright light, a pair of blue panties balled up in her right fist. She was waving her fist around as if she was about to do some sort of magic trick with her panties, turn them into a dove or something. At the same time, her flushed face was leaning into some young uniformed cop’s pale face, yelling at him. The top to my Rabbit was down, so i could hear each word as crisp as snapping carrots.

“This is total bullshit!” Wren hollered.

The skinny young cop was leaning as far back as he could without flipping backward over the railing. His eyes were wide and unfocused, as if he’d just been told he was the offspring of incest. Like most men who’ve come face-to-face with Wren’s temper, he looked both a little murderous and a little in love.

I quickly swung the Rabbit to the curb and honked twice.

Wren didn’t take her fierce eyes off the young cop. She continued to glare at him as she backed down the steps toward my car without actually looking where she was going. As if she were guided by some psychic homing device. Anyone else I’d have been worried would trip and fall. But not Wren. She had never done one ungraceful thing in her entire life. She’s probably pirouetted out of her mothers’ womb and did the Maypole dance with the umbilical cord. Finally, Wren turned toward me. This is when i noticed the huge tan bandage the size of a business card angled across her forehead, partially covering her left eyebrow. A moist rusty spot soaked through the center of the bandage. Three drops of blood formed a teardrop constellation on her white T-shirt.

Wren had only descended two steps when she stopped abruptly and pivoted back around toward the cop. Her tennis shoes squealed against the smooth cement. The startled young cop flinched. His hand dropped to his gun.

“And you are an asshole!” Wren proclaimed, pointing her panties at him. “You hear what I’m saying, Officer? Do you?”

She marched toward my car, climbed in, and slammed the door. “Let’s get the fuck out of here before I kill someone else.”

14. Earth Angel (Raymond Obstfeld)
*Not surprisingly, Obstfeld is the real name of Laramie Dunaway, one of my other favorite authors. It’s him, writing under a female pseudonym.

From Publishers Weekly

After Dr. Season Gottlieb’s fiance, Tim, goes on a shooting spree and murders five people before being shot by the police, Season feels both grief and guilt. But rather than explore what provoked Tim’s rampage, Season dubs herself Grace Weiss and tries to make amends to the victims’ families. While the heroine’s good intentions are credible, her way of playing “angel” is nonsensical and the plot ridiculously convoluted. One victim’s cousin refuses Season’s no-strings gift of $50,000, then calls the cops; when Season tries to set up another victim’s stepbrother with the woman of his dreams, the woman recognizes her from TV newscasts and blackmails her. And when Season visits a third man linked to Tim’s crime-the ex-husband of a witness who committed suicide-she falls for him. Her benevolent mission ends there; she’s less interested in philanthropy than in concealing her identity from her new lover. As the book drifts into the doldrums, Obstfeld loses all control of his material, allowing a serial-kidnapping subplot to come to the fore. Season, a movie-trivia whiz, is among the few people who can decode the kidnapper’s cryptic clues, and the police force her to help them by threatening to expose her ruse. With each new scenario, Obstfeld shows that no good deed goes unpunished. Unfortunately, such relentlessly zany methods prove dull rather than remotely humorous.
Copyright 1995 Reed Business Information, Inc.

Product Description

Dr. Season Makenzie, an accomplished thirtysomething physician at a Southern California walk-in clinic, finds her life devastated when her boyfriend visits her at work with a gun and opens fire on her patients.

15. Life 101:Everything We Wish We Had Learned About Life in School–But Didn’t (John-Roger and Peter McWilliams)

Product Description

From the back cover:
WHEN YOU ARE…
Angry, Depressed, Anxious, Tired, Resentful, Upset, Nervous, Unhappy, confused, Frightened, or in any way not healthy, wealthy and happy, then School is in Session!

But it’s not “school” as you remember it. This is a book about learning, doing and enjoying that’s actually fun. Really.

By the time we graduate form high school, most of us have spent more than 14,500 hours in the classroom. Along the way, we learned (and promptly forgot) several million little facts.

But in all that time, did we learn–or even explore–the meaning of life? Did we learn how to love ourselves? Did we learn the importance of forgiving ourself and others? Did we learn about worthiness (and how to get it), the power of thoughts (and how to use them), or the value of mistakes? Did anyone teach us how to use guilt, resentment, pain and fear for our learning, upliftment and growth? Did we learn our purpose in life?

If not, it’s not too late. You are holding the class you’ve been waiting for in your hands.

16. An Underground Education:The Unauthorized and Outrageous Supplement to Everything You Thought You Knew About Art, Sex, Business, Crime, Science, Medicine, and Other Fields of Human (Richard Zacks)

Amazon.com Review

Forget the history you were taught in school; Richard Zacks’s version is crueler and funnier than anything you might have learned in seventh-grade civics–and much more of a gross-out, too. Described on the book jacket as an “autodidact extraordinaire,” Zacks is also the author of History Laid Bare, making him something of an expert guide through history’s back alleys and side streets. There’s no fact too seamy or perverse for Zacks to drag out into the light of day, from matters scatological and sexual to some of history’s most truly bizarre episodes. Curious about ancient nose-blowing etiquette? What about the sexual proclivities of Catherine the Great? Throughout chapters such as “The Evolution of Underwear” and “Dentistry Before Novocaine,” Zacks proves a tireless debunker of popular myths as well as a muckraker par excellence. –This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

Reviews

Astonishing facts!

Bizarre photographs!

Fascinating & sometimes deeply weird true stories!

Just a small taste of the intellectual smorgasbord contained in this volume.

Did you know:

….that in the original story of Goldilocks the bears torture and kill their impolite visitor?
…that Pope Leo XIII appeared in an advertisement for cocaine-laced wine in the 1880s?
…that people didn’t eat with forks until the 1700s?
…that Sir Isaac Newton’s famous humble-pie quote “If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants” was actually written to a dwarf scientist named Robert Hooke and clearly meant as an insult?
…that Thomas Edison secretly helped develop the electric chair in a scheme to have the lethal machine named after his arch-rival, George Westinghouse?
that the first pediatric guide written in the United States recommended that expectant mothers breastfeed puppies?
…that for two centuries French scientists obsessively experimented on freshly decapitated heads in an effort to discover whether the bodiless brain still functioned?
…that Cleopatra was ugly as sin?

17. Everything You Know is Wrong:The Disinformation Guide to Secrets and Lies (Russ Kick)
*in fact, all of these Disinformation Guides are Must-reads. They are a wealth of information not found through normal channels.

From Library Journal

From the people who brought us You Are Being Lied To, here is another engrossing and infuriating compilation of muckraking articles, expos s, and provocative claims. Some of the pieces in the book are very timely: an assertion that the government had advance warning of the September 11 terrorist attacks, reports of additional gunmen at Columbine High School, and additional details on Senator Bob Kerrey’s actions in Vietnam. Most of the articles were written for this volume, though some appeared previously in reputable magazines and journals (e.g., the Village Voice, Toronto Globe & Mail, and Journal of Medical Ethics). Not all the pieces deal with political issues; readers will find a wide range of social (“Mad Cow Disease”), financial (“World Bank and the WTO”), and cultural topics. A few familiar names appear among the contributors (Howard Zinn, Paul Krassner), but most are investigative reporters not well known to the public. This contrarian collection will attract a diverse readership from conspiracy nuts to academics and is recommended for most public libraries. Thomas A. Karel, Franklin & Marshall Coll. Lib., Lancaster, PA

Reviews

“Even if you just check it out from the library, you owe it to yourself to read it.” — Movement (Jacksonville, FL), May 2002

“It’s a great read.” – Jane Magazine, August 2002

“Much of it will shock your sensibilities. It’s mindboggling stuff. But read it you should.” Discourse & Disclosure, Summer 2002

“The kind of book you want to buy and give to everyone you know” – Rain Taxi Summer 2002

“These stories can be scary” – Seven Magazine, July 2002

“This book could change the way you process information. This book could actually make you smarter.” – Tacoma Reporter, July 25, 2002

“[A] fun and compelling read” -- Enter Stage Right, June 2002

“[A]nother engrossing and infuriating compilation of muckraking articles, exposes, and provocative claims … recommended for most public libraries.” – Library Journal

“a bracing collection of contrarian articles covering a broad spectrum of subjects” – The Guardian, October 5, 2002

“bold and brash and just a little bit frightening, irregardless of which side of the political center readers find themselves” – The Boox Review, July 10, 2002

18. Lessons in Survival (Laramie Dunaway)
*surprise! I really do love “her” writing. Thanks, Raymond.
You might have to find a copy of this in bookstores and libraries–it’ s a little hard to track down sometimes.

From Publishers Weekly

Dunaway’s latest (after the beguiling Borrowed Lives ) is an overambitious and bluntly unromantic tale of a mixed-up child- and adulthood. Narrator Blue Erhart, a 32-year-old high school biology teacher, has a notorious past: her parents were hippie bank robbers who followed the Robin Hood ethic and were sent to prison after Blue bought an ice cream cone with a marked bill. Nineteen years later, their sentences are served, and Blue, who stopped visiting them when her mother turned down parole on principle, can no longer fathom the role of daughter. And with good reason. Her folks aren’t just quirky, they’re downright unpleasant. When Blue first catches up with them at a dingy apartment, her mother answers the door stark naked and cracks jokes about homophobia. Besides having to contend with such oddities, Blue also spends time dodging reporters, fending off an aspiring movie producer who wants the rights to her story and pursuing Thomas Q, the messianic subject of her dissertation. That a small-time filmmaker is curious about Blue seems credible, but it’s a stretch to believe that paparazzi spend hours each day monitoring her apartment. Blue is too gruff to win over readers (making love with her ex-husband, biology-minded Blue imagines the dust mites that inhabit the carpet.) Readers are more punished than rewarded for perseverance as Dunaway’s sitcom-ish material slips out of her grasp.

Divorced high school biology teacher Blue Erhart leads a quiet, conventional life until her notorious bank-robbing parents are released from prison. Hounded by the press and TV-movie producers, she goes on the lam, much as she did in her youth with her fugitive Mom and Dad. Led largely by her libido, Blue leaps from Rush, a sometime Hollywood agent, to cult-leader Thomas Q, the subject of her master’s thesis. Her quest for identity and renewed focus gets pretty frenetic, and her parents’ continuing lust for robbing banks doesn’t help. But, just in time, true love finds a way, and Blue and Rush live happily ever after. Not as clever and refreshing as Dunaway’s first book, Borrowed Lives ( LJ 10/15/92), this is nonetheless very innovative, entertaining, and itself a prime candidate for a TV movie. Recommended.

19. The Illustrated Brief History of Time & The Universe in a Nutshell (Stephen Hawking)

The Universe in a Nutshell

Stephen Hawking’s phenomenal, multimillion-copy bestseller, A Brief History of Time, introduced the ideas of this brilliant theoretical physicist to readers all over the world.

Now, in a major publishing event, Hawking returns with a lavishly illustrated sequel that unravels the mysteries of the major breakthroughs that have occurred in the years since the release of his acclaimed first book.

The Universe in a Nutshell

* Quantum mechanics * M-theory * General relativity * 11-dimensional supergravity * 10-dimensional membranes * Superstrings * P-branes * Black holes

One of the most influential thinkers of our time, Stephen Hawking is an intellectual icon, known not only for the adventurousness of his ideas but for the clarity and wit with which he expresses them. In this new book Hawking takes us to the cutting edge of theoretical physics, where truth is often stranger than fiction, to explain in laymen’s terms the principles that control our universe.

Like many in the community of theoretical physicists, Professor Hawking is seeking to uncover the grail of science — the elusive Theory of Everything that lies at the heart of the cosmos. In his accessible and often playful style, he guides us on his search to uncover the secrets of the universe — from supergravity to supersymmetry, from quantum theory to M-theory, from holography to duality.

He takes us to the wild frontiers of science, where superstring theory and p-branes may hold the final clue to the puzzle. And he lets us behind the scenes of one of his most exciting intellectual adventures as he seeks “to combine Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity and Richard Feynman’s idea of multiple histories into one complete unified theory that will describe everything that happens in the universe.”

With characteristic exuberance, Professor Hawking invites us to be fellow travelers on this extraordinary voyage through space-time. Copious four-color illustrations help clarify this journey into a surreal wonderland where particles, sheets, and strings move in eleven dimensions; where black holes evaporate and disappear, taking their secret with them; and where the original cosmic seed from which our own universe sprang was a tiny nut.

The Universe in a Nutshell is essential reading for all of us who want to understand the universe in which we live. Like its companion volume, A Brief History of Time, it conveys the excitement felt within the scientific community as the secrets of the cosmos reveal themselves.

The Illustrated Brief History of Time

In the years since its publication in 1988, Stephen Hawking’s A Brief History of Time has established itself as a landmark volume in scientific writing. It has also become an international publishing phenomenon, translated into forty languages and selling over nine million copies. The book was on the cutting edge of what was then known about the nature of the universe, but since then there have been extraordinary advances in the technology of observing both the micro- and the macrocosmic world. These observations have confirmed many of Professor Hawking’s theoretical predictions in the first edition of his book, including the recent discoveries of the Cosmic Background Explorer satellite (COBE), which probed back in time to within 300,000 years of the universe’s beginning and revealed the wrinkles in the fabric of space-time that he had projected.

Eager to bring to his original text the new knowledge revealed by these many observations, as well as his most recent research, for this revised and expanded edition Hawking has prepared a new introduction to the book, revised and updated the original chapters throughout, and written an entirely new chapter on the fascinating subject of wormholes and time travel.

In addition, to heighten understanding of complex concepts that readers may have found difficult to grasp despite the clarity and wit of Hawking’s writing, this edition is magnificently enhanced throughout with more than 240 full-color illustrations, including satellite images, photographs made possible by spectacular new technological advances such as the Hubble telescope, and computer- generated images of three- and four-dimensional realities. Detailed captions clarify these illustrations, enabling readers to experience the vastness of intergalactic space, the nature of black holes, and the microcosmic world of particle physics in which matter and antimatter collide.

A classic work that now brings to the reader the latest understanding of cosmology, The Illustrated A Brief History of Time is the story of the ongoing search for the tantalizing secrets at the heart of time and space.

20. Friday -Robert A. Heinlein

Review

“FRIDAY IS A SUPERBEING…Engineered from the finest genes, and trained to be a secret courier in a future world of chaotic ferocity and intrigue, she can think better and make love better than any of the normal people around her”.– The New York Times Book Review

Product Description

Engineered from the finest genes, and trained to be a secret courier in a future world, Friday operates over a near-future Earth, where chaos reigns. Working at Boss’s whimsical behest she travels from far north to deep south, finding quick, expeditious solutions as one calamity after another threatens to explode in her face….

21. Atheist Universe (David Mills)
* I have to say, this was one of the most clear and helpful books to make the case for atheism. David is a master at explaining it. I am proud to have him as one of my friends on Facebook.

Review

David’s work will be very useful for anyone combating harmful religious beliefs. Honest, frank, and right to the point! — Albert Ellis, Ph.D., father of modern psychotherapy, author of ‘A Guide to Rational Living’ and 54 other books

With impeccable logic, intellectual bravery, and professional clarity Mills points the way past religion. — Dorion Sagan, science writer, son of Carl Sagan

Product Description

Clear, concise, and persuasive, Atheist Universe details exactly why God is unnecessary to explain the universe and life’s diversity, organization, and beauty. The author thoroughly rebuts every argument that claims to “prove” God’s existence — arguments based on logic, common sense, philosophy, ethics, history and science.
Atheist Universe avoids the esoteric language used by philosophers and presents its scientific evidence in simple lay terms, making it a richly entertaining and easy-to-read introduction to atheism. A comprehensive primer, it addresses all the historical and scientific questions, including: Is there proof that God does not exist? What evidence is there of Jesus’ resurrection? Can creation science reconcile scripture with the latest scientific discoveries?
Atheist Universe also answers ethical issues such as: What is the meaning of life without God? It’s a spellbinding inquiry that ultimately arrives at a controversial and well-documented conclusion.

Be the first to like.

Yes There IS Something in the Water

Another popular meme in mainstream esoteric spirituality is the buzz about the Japanese guy who takes pictures of water crystals at a microscopic level, to prove that water responds appropriately to negative and positive input.Dr. Masuru Emoto is enjoying the proceeds from his book, The Hidden Messages in Water. Mr. Emoto’s book reveals photographs of water crystals which apparently respond to certain words positively or negatively in correlation with the nature of the words. He contends that not only are thoughts things, but that these thing-thoughts can alter the shape and design of water crystals. As if water has emotion.No one in the legitimate scientific community is taking it seriously, and Stephen Lower, a Chemistry professor, even debunks this on his site. [1]First, according to Lower, these photographs are not of water molecules, and “convey no information about water.” And apparently, Mr. Emoto has only published in “Explore: The Journal of Science and Healing.” This would seem to cover the peer-reviewed journal stipulation of credibility, and Emoto reportedly did a double-blind and a triple blind study. This would normally impart a stamp of credibility on the work, but let’s ask the questions: who were the “peers” in this journal, and was it really a double-blind study?Who Were His Peers?
It is my understanding that invoking the “peer” stipulation, implies the peers are reputable, and accordingly scientific. This does NOT refer to HIS peers, since his title of “Doctor” comes from his certification from the “Open International University for Alternative Medicine” in India.According to The Skeptic Dictionary,

“For $3,750 USD one could buy any of the following degrees: M.D. (M.A.), M.D. (T.M.), Dr. Ac., or Ph.D. These letters stand for Doctor of Medicine (Alternativa Medicina), Doctor of Medicine (Traditional Medicine), Doctor of Acupuncture, and Doctor of Philosophy. Registration was an extra $1,000…” [2]

Okay, a diploma mill for a shady institution. It’s bad enough to get a fake diploma from a RESPECTED educational institution, but to buy a fake diploma from a fake one…well, that’s just rubbing it in.

Among his “peers” –the ones who “Reviewed” his findings–are:

Larry Dossey, M.D., the author of Healing Words: The Power of Prayer and the Practice of Medicine and Prayer Is Good Medicine and How to Reap the Healing Benefits of Prayer. First of all, prayer is NOT medicine. The ineffectiveness of prayer has been debunked many times over in legitimate scientific experiments, and I debunked it again in my own book, Supernatural Hypocrisy: The Cognitive Dissonance of A God Cosmology.

Among the many other claims embraced by Dossey:

Uri Geller’s powers; voodoo and “distant hexing”; a “93 percent accurate” cold-reader “Therapeutic Touch” (the New Age technique recently scandalizing the Colorado Board of Nursing); Robert Jahn’s random-event generator experiments which “transcend space [and] time” (and which have since been debunked in a parapsychology journal!); William Braud’s experiments showing that “the mental images of one person can modify the activity of the autonomic nervous system of a distant person [who is] unaware that the attempt is being made”; the Biblical story (Joshua 10:12-14) of the sun standing still: “In addition to standing still, could time become ‘disjointed,’ such that the future would precede the present, or the present precede the past?” (Anecdote: an unidentified man was spontaneously cured of colon cancer through his minister’s prayer before the prayer was even said!) “ [3]

Another peer? Dean Radin, who “has a master’s degree in electrical engineering and a Ph.D. in educational psychology from the University of Illinois. He is director of the Consciousness Research Laboratory and Senior Scientist and Laboratory Director at the Institute of Noetic Sciences. He also does research for the Boundary Institute. He’s been active in psi research for several decades and has published more than 200 papers related to parapsychology.” [4]

Interestingly, Radin was both a peer who reviewed it, and a co-author. Radin admitted to removing the double-blind aspect to get rid of some results that didn’t match what he wanted to see. That’s most definitely NOT scientific. Nor is it honest.

Radin is also the the Co-editor-in-Chief of….wait for it…

Explore.

The journal that published Emoto’s work. Do you smell a rat? I do.

Was it Double-Blind?
Only to the truth, apparently. Dean Radin, Emoto’s partner in aqua-crime, has a reputation that precedes him; albeit a bad one.

“Radin has been known to select data that fits his hypothesis and ignore that which doesn’t, and so there’s no reason to think that hasn’t happened here. Radin even admits he un-blinded the study to eliminate some data he didn’t like. Add the fact that there was no control group, the null hypotheses were not even rejected, and the only interesting thing they found required some (admitted by the authors) post hoc rationalization, and there really isn’t much left worth looking at.” [5]

In a paper entitled, “Review and analysis of Dr. Masaru Emoto’s published work on the effects of external stimuli on the structural formation of ice crystals,” Vermont’s Castleton State College professor Kristopher Setchfield had this to say:

 

” It is this crucial lack of scientific foundation that prevents Dr. Emoto’s work from attracting interest by widely accepted and respected scientists at long-standing research institutions. This is unfortunate for the world if there is, after all, truth to his claims–as reproduction of his results by any scientist would lend much credence to his work. A little change in Emoto’s experimental design would do great things for the credibility of his claims. I recommend the following to ground his work in sound scientific principle:

  • * Eliminate the possibility of the scientist’s bias affecting the experiment’s results by implementing double blind procedures.
  • * Publish the entire collection of photos for all water sample tests that he has performed, not just the ones that support his claim.
  • * Minimize the sources of possible error in his procedures, such as variation in temperature and humidity between sample.
  • * Pay more attention to the time-tested methods of the scientific community rather than disregarding them. Emoto’s research could go much farther if he could interest scientists around the world in testing his hypothesis.


After the lengthy review of Emoto’s research methods and results, I have come to believe that Dr. Emoto is offering pseudoscience to the masses in the guise of defensible research. Only time and review by others will tell if there is any truth at the heart of Mr. Emoto’s claims, as Emoto himself thoroughly believes in his findings but does not value the scientific method or community. What is truly fearsome is the great numbers of people that accept his words as proven facts without looking deeper to find out if his claims are truly justified. While I respect Dr. Emoto’s desire to save the Earth’s water from contamination and pollution, unless he can produce a scientific paper and get it published in a scientific journal, I believe that he will continue to be ignored by the scientific community, and his claims will never be soundly proved or disproved.” [6]

James Randi, the infamous debunker of all things paranormal, has offered his usual one million dollar prize to Emoto if he can reproduce, in a REAL double-blind study, showing all his methods and results, that his claims are true. Emoto has not accepted the offer.

This is a sure sign of esoteric spirituality at its most embarrassing. Now, there is a whole slew of products based on this magical water, and gullible consumers are lining the pockets of those who offer it.

I can only call on an altered version of that beloved Styx song and say, “Domo arigato, Mr. Emoto.” Thank you for giving us another reason to scoff at the scientifically ignorant, and for the opportunity to expose you for the charlatan you are.

——————————————————————–
[1] Water Cluster Quakery: The Junk Science of Structure-Altered Waters
http://www.chem1.com/CQ/clusqk.html. Stephen Lower is a retired faculty member of the
Dept of Chemistry, Simon Fraser University Burnaby / Vancouver, Canada

[2] http://www.skepdic.com/microacupuncture.html
[3]
http://www.gpposner.com/Healing_Words.html
[4]
http://www.skepdic.com/refuge/radin1.html
[5]
Skeptico: Critical Thinking for an irrational world. Mar 28, 2009. “Distant From Science”
[6]
Vitalis News. http://www.vitalisnews.com/emoto.htm

Be the first to like.

The Stuttering Murderer Who Was God’s Bitch

Excerpt from
Supernatural Hypocrisy: The Cognitive Dissonanceof a God Cosmology

WHILE A PHARAOH WAS ordering all male Hebrew babies killed, the mother of Moses attempted to spare his life by placing him in a basket as a three month old infant, and sending him floating down the river, where the daughter of Egyptian royalty found him and raised him. All very dramatic, but not in the least original.

In fact, this story was originally a Babylonian tale about King Sargon, rendered a very long time before Moses was born. Again, this is a borrowed myth found in the bible, but presented as a unique bit of biblical history.

According to scripture, Moses was a humble man with a speech impediment. God never praised him for his servitude, other than to say “…my servant Moses; he is faithful in all my house.” (Numbers 12:7). That’s why I see him as God’s Bitch.

Chosen by God, though he was, Moses was nonetheless a murderer. One wonders why God chooses murderers as his favorites. Moses had killed an Egyptian man for beating a Hebrew man, and escaped once his crime was found out (Exodus 2:11). Maybe the tainted past of Moses is precisely why he was chosen. God wanted him to do some unsavory things. He needed to know he was capable of it.

And he even broke the Ten Commandments—literally. Broke the tablets. When he returned from the mountain, with those big, huge, heavy tablets in hand, and saw the big party going on, he threw them down and broke them in anger (Exodus 32:19). Now, if you had words written “by the finger of God” in your hands, would you thoughtlessly throw them down and break them? Just a postscript. In the famous Rembrandt painting, Moses is depicted holding these two stone tablets over his head, as if they were made of Styrofoam. This would of course be true for Charlton Heston in the movie version, but obviously wouldn’t be true at the alleged event. I just find things like that comical.

Oh, and the story of the tablet? Also previously found in Babylonian myth of Hammurabi. A child is born in secret, the child had to be sent away because of events going on, the child was placed in a basket of bulrushes, sealed with tar and sent adrift on a river, and then the child was discovered by someone who became a foster parent. Just like many of the stories in the Bible, this one is no different. There can be found striking parallels to other ancient stories. The birth of Moses is merely one.

Later, Moses gets married and becomes a shepherd, and then sees the burning bush, and it’s God, who introduces Himself and tells him He wants Moses to free his people (The Hebrews) from the oppression of Egypt, and guide them all to the Land of Canaan, where there is milk and honey and all that jazz. But first, he has to take the magical powers God will give him and show the Egyptians, so they’ll let him go, and God also demonstrates a few magic tricks, then gives Moses permission to plunder the Egyptians before he begins the journey.

Moses is still a little hesitant, because he doesn’t communicate well, and has a speech impediment, and God assures him he will be able to do it properly because He will help. Moses is still unsure and this makes God mad, so he says he will allow his brother Aaron, who is well-spoken to relay God’s message, and so Moses can tell Aaron, and then Aaron can do the talking. And what does Moses finally have to say, at the behest of God Almighty? “Israel is my son, My first-born[1] and…Let my son go so that he may serve me, but you have refused to let him go. Behold, I will kill your son, your first born.” So, more killing, sanctified by God.

God then decided to kill Moses, but no one seems to know why, and changed his mind, when the mother of that first-born, cut the end of her baby’s penis off[2] and threw it at Moses.

When Moses confronts the Pharaoh, his parlor tricks weren’t all that impressive, because it seems the Pharaoh’s magicians could do the same things. So what was so special about God giving Moses the same abilities?

Then, Moses turns the river to blood, and the magicians could do that too, so the Pharaoh still didn’t listen. The Nile was polluted and undrinkable, yet the Egyptians lived for 7 days, and maybe longer, who knows, with no water. Egypt, kids, is in Africa. It was hot. Wonder how everyone survived?

Then came the plague of frogs, which the magician’s were also able to replicate.

Then the plague of gnats, and the magicians couldn’t seem to replicate that trick, and thus announced it “the finger of God” finally.[3] The same type of thing happened repeatedly with different plague-forms afterward; from dying cattle, to boils, to hail, to locusts.[4]But notice that with the plague of boils, the repeated phrase, “But the heart of the Pharaoh was hardened” or “but Pharaoh hardened his heart” then became “And the LORD hardened Pharaoh’s heart.”

Now, if God was trying to convince the Pharaoh to listen to Him, through Moses, then why in the world would He harden Pharaoh’s heart? God was playing his own Devil’s Advocate. Makes no sense.

Then when the Hail Plague was on its way, the bible states that those who did not heed the warning would die. If God wasn’t yelling this from the heavens, how did everyone know about it? Again, a flaw in the plot written by God.

After the hail, the Pharaoh finally got the picture and admitted he had sinned against God. Then changed his mind when the hail ceased. Was God toying with him again?

Next, God sent the plague of locusts (because the gnats weren’t insecty enough, I suppose).

Then finally we see that God was indeed doing all this so he could make fools of the Egyptians and word would travel about how God doesn’t screw around. But why would an omnipotent being need to go through this song and dance when he could have just smote the Pharaoh and left a burning, handwritten message on the floor next to him?

Then the Pharaoh repented again, but God flipped the hard-heart switch and he reneged once more. Then the same thing happened with three days of darkness over the land, and finally, Pharaoh was so flustered by being bandied about by the manipulations of God, that he told Moses to go and take his livestock and his people, and if he ever saw his face again, Moses would die, and Moses said something like “you’re right, I won’t see your face again!” These men were just marionettes for the Almighty.

Then for good measure, God sent one more plague.[5] And it was a doozy. He decided to kill all the first born sons of every family in Egypt, (to include the first born of the animal kingdom present there). Seems God was just as fond of killing first-born sons, as Pharaohs. In this case, when God saw enough blood running in the streets, he would protect the Hebrews from the massacre He Himself rendered. And this, my friends, is known as Passover. The lovely festival celebrated by Jews. A holiday rendered in the blood of innocents. Amen, and praise His name.

This was by no means the whole story of Moses, but with these points in mind, it’s hard to view the Pentateuch[6] as anything other than another myth, unless you instead choose to worship a god of this ilk. And yet, Christians base their beliefs on information of this sort.

———————————————————————————————–

[1] That would make Jesus the Second-born?
[2] AKA, circumcision.
[3] Though why it wasn’t the “hand of God” I cannot surmise; perhaps because gnats are small, they assumed it must only take a God-Finger.

[4] Didn’t he already do the insect thing?
[5] He must have been having too much fun and couldn’t help Himself.

[6] The first five books of the Hebrew Bible, also called the Torah. In Greek, the word Pentateuch means “five volumes.”

Be the first to like.

Switch to our mobile site