Archive for the ‘PUBLISHING’ Category

The (Un)Importance of Readers | The Misbehaving Mind

REBLOG:

The (Un)Importance of Readers | The Misbehaving Mind. (Kate Genet)

Thank you, Kira Lyn Blue, for nominating me for a Sunshine Award – “a recognition from fellow bloggers to those who positively and creatively inspire others in the blogosphere”. But the truth is, I’ve been feeling far less than sunshiny about writing lately. In fact, I’ve been in a major grump about it. And let me tell you, when a writer gets in a grump about writing, the sky’s pretty much falling.

 My book sales took a dip before Christmas. This wouldn’t usually bother me – I rarely used to check the sales numbers anyway. As long as that cheque was arriving in the mail every month, I was happy. I don’t write without expecting to be paid for it, but I don’t write for money either. Except this dip in sales was more like a crash off a cliff and my sales have lingered twisted and wounded at the bottom of the cliff ever since.

 I’m not going to go into the details of why I think this happened, because I’ve no real, sure idea. The consequences however, they’ve been on my mind. I’ve had to look about for a day job again, and that’s some big deal since poor health makes it impossible to work outside my home. But finding other ways to make money isn’t necessarily a problem, except that it means less time for writing. And I like writing. I like it better than anything else.

 Except once I realised I wasn’t getting as many sales, I began to question what I was writing, and why. Unfortunately for me, I write in a small niche genre within a small niche genre. I long came to the conclusion that lesbians don’t generally like reading horror. Even when it’s called supernatural suspense or some other fancy name. On the whole, they’re big romance readers. I hate writing romance. I might have romantic relationships in my books, but tell me to write a typical romance story and I’ll lock myself in a cupboard until you’ve gone home (and I have a particular fear of being locked in small cupboards ever since a rather alarming experience at the age of 9).

 But I found myself considering the task. Because of the money. Because of liking to pay the mortgage and eat and other unreasonable things. I knew however, that there’s no way I could do it. It’s just not in me. I’d be bored writing it, and it would never get finished. I’m already pissed off enough that my most popular books are slippy sliding into that paranormal romance category.

 Which led me to being really fucking annoyed with readers. Why, I ranted to myself (and my poor partner) does the average reader want so little from a book? Why do they like to stick to one genre? Why do they go loopy loo over incredibly formulaic writing? I got quite hot under the collar on the subject. When I calmed down a little, I looked at the work I’d been doing, writing my novellas about the dimension-travelling Reality Dawn and thought to myself that therein might lie my salvation. While not romance, they might find a decent audience. They might be my life-line back into being able to quit the day job and stick with the writing.

 Immediately upon having considered this possibility however, the fun was sucked out of the whole project. The Reality Dawn books were no longer me enjoying myself and trying something new, moving slightly north of horror into fantasy. Instead I found myself trying to figure out whether readers would like this or that about them, whether they would prefer if this or that happened, if they would want more of this or that from them.

 The whole thing suddenly got very boring and very painful. They weren’t even properly finished and they were no longer my stories. I wasn’t having fun anymore, and I wasn’t writing because it pleased me to. I was writing for a bunch of people I didn’t even know and wasn’t feeling at all impressed with. Worse, I was allowing this imagined crowd of readers to dictate the course of my stories.

 Well, that was a situation that couldn’t last. There were only a few options that I could see. I could drown my sorrows in the bottom of a glass of bourbon – useless suggestion as I don’t drink. I could write solely for profit, turning out copy I thought readers would buy by the bunch. Which could possibly work. I can write well enough to make just about anything sound good, what would it cost me to write what sells? Only my storywriting soul. So, not an option at all. I can slant my writing with an eye to the market, but I’m buggered if I’m going to sell my soul to it. I haven’t been able to get rid of the belief that the stories I have inside me are worth the telling, even if they’re light years from pure, unadulterated romances.

 So, one option left. Forget about the readers. Forget about their preferences, their desire for this sort of story over that. Stop thinking about the large group called average reader and what their average little hearts want, and just write as I damned well please.

 That’s the option I chose. I stuck a great big ‘fuck you’ sign over the picture of average reader slobbering over a cheesy romance, and went back to going my own way. Writing for myself and my ideal reader. Doing it, not just because I want to get paid, but because I’m a writer and I have stories to tell.

 The funny thing is, having thought this epiphany would lead me to start some deep, dark, and twisty novel full of scary shit and other things that go bump in the night, I opened Word and started the third Reality Dawn book. There are dragons in it, and Reality Dawn and her sidekick Rae are having the time of their lives. Just like me.

 As for the money? I might not have a large market of readers to keep me in furs and pearls, but I have plenty of books to write – for myself and the ideal reader who finds they like what I do. Time to get back to it.

=============

MY COMMENT:

You know I feel your pain, my love, as I am in the same boat. After over 20 years of honing my craft and evolving as a writer, I have found that many lesbian readers don’t want anything that makes them think too hard. Hell, some of them even get angry at plots that are unpredictable or complex. I want to write what I want to write, but get bogged down in the marketing aspect, and how little lesbians expand their literary horizons. I still read mostly mainstream fiction, and am not ashamed to say so, nor do I feel it’s some sort of betrayal to lesbians-what it is, is a testimony to the fact that there is more quality fiction in the mainstream than in lesbian literature. Maybe this cliquish lesfic genre needs to evolve–not maybe–in my opinion, it DOES. Writing, and the books that result, should ALWAYS be about the quality of the story, the skill of the author, and not about one genre or another. But alas, there is a hardcore popularity in cheesy romance that reminds me of all the Harlequins I read as a teen. I outgrew those as I matured, and needed deeper material. I don’t understand it either–why lesbian readers don’t thrive on good stories, instead of vapid, puerile drivel.

The other day on Facebook, a lesbian “writer” posted a short snippet of erotic dialogue/interaction, and I almost hurled. Especially when a slew of her fans posted fawning one-liner reviews below it, as if it were actually titillating, and not insipid, adolescent rubbish. Harsh? You betcha. It’s not that there aren’t any good romance writers out there. But most of it, frankly, is not good, it’s swill. I just wish lesbian readers would have a bit more integrity and pride in their literary pursuits; I wish they’d evolve, demand quality writing. What they are doing, is supporting something that speaks ill of us as a community–like we have nothing substantial to offer, and don’t take pride in things like solid storytelling, grammar, punctuation, depth and significance.

Be the first to like.

Thoughts from a Literary Contrarian

I enjoy the commonality and compatibility in my current relationship. (Wait. Current relationship makes it sound temporary. It’s not. Let me give that another go: I enjoy the commonality and compatibility with my love, my life, my soon to be wife. (Better).

NightKindleAnyway, we have this ritual of reading every night before sleep, if not also in blocks of time during the day.  As authors, that ritual would be expected, but I’ve never been with another author before, so I’m going to notice these things.

I like it. A lot.

Digression Alert: I remember one night, I’m lying in bed with my honey, reading my Nook book, and she tries to get up, and ker-plunk! falls right in the floor. She just had a little dizzy spell. I like to think I have that effect on women. Especially in bed. Hu-HURRR!holdhandsinbed

Anyway, Last night we were settled in with our Nook and Kindle, respectively, holding hands between page turning, as usual, and I wanted to tell her how much I was enjoying my book, so politely asked about hers first.

“What are you reading?”

“It’s about a vampire private investigator,” she said. “I don’t recall the title…”

 I offered, “Sucking Dick?”

This got me a smirk and an eye-roll when I was sure it warranted an irrepressible guffaw.

I donned the cloak of maturity enough to let that go and told her how pleased I was with the Michael Stark book I was reading.  This is important only because I rarely enjoy the fiction I find these days… Unless it’s Kate’s work (not obligatory; I really do love her writing) or the few authors I’ve come across that don’t bore me or aggravate me (like recent discoveries of Michael Robotham, Nelson DeMille).  I have, in fact, developed a zero-tolerance for all the tripe out there, especially since the onset of indie publishing, which has compounded the number of authors who can now publish themselves, but shouldn’t. It’s so difficult to chop through the editedwritingunderbrush of hackneyed formulas, stilted, uninteresting dialogue and purple prose. I wince at the deplorable disregard for the basic skills a writer must nurture, confronted too often with atrocious spelling, horrible grammar, sloppy mechanics and punctuation, and the specter of writers unacquainted with concepts like story arc, characterization, and plotting. Oh why do so many these days think they can write a book just because they are titillated by the idea of it and not because writing is a part of their core identity, and they care about the craft and are willing to do the hard work? When will they understand what an insult it is to writers who have spent the last 10 or 20 years paying their dues, writing and rewriting, honing their skills and studiously applying what they continue to learn?

…and perhaps more to the point, how did I become such a literary contrarian?

(Take a breath)

Probably, there is no singular path for an authentic writer to have taken. Each of our histories are as diverse as the books we write. The one common denominator for all writers, though, seems to be a love of books and reading.

When I was younger, I was a voracious reader – I devoured everything I could wrap my fingers around. Yet, perhaps oddly, I have no memory of being read to by either of my parents. I have no beloved childhood classics burned in my brain and recalled fondly as a bonding exercise with mommy or daddy. In fact, I read most of that genre during one of my stints in college when I took a Children’s Literature course. From that experience, I can say I loved The Velveteen Rabbit, Dr. Seuss (et al), Maurice Sendak (Where the Wild Things Are), and Alice in Wonderland, among others that escape me at the moment.johncartermarsseries

My earliest memories of reading were perhaps preteen years. I read the Chronicles of Narnia and all of Madeleine L’Engle’s books (and later enjoyed a written correspondence with her for a while; back when people still sent letters via snail mail).

I was also a huge fan of Edgar Rice Burroughs– mostly the Tarzan series and the John Carter on Mars series– as well as Robert A. Heinlein (Though, regrettably, never exchanged letters with either). All of these books shared a genre of adventure, and that’s what my mind craved. I wanted to escape, I suppose, from my hum-drum life.

For some inexplicable reason I then moved into a catalog of cheesy romance books– Harlequin, Silhouette, and bodicerippersthe like. Perhaps out of some peer pressure, perhaps as a means of at last viewing myself as a romantic creature headed for sexual exploration.

Looking back on it now, I can see that it served to keep me in my puerile, late-bloomer stage a little too long. I finally outgrew those types of books, when I started pursuing the vocation of writing seriously and with the single-minded focus of a true passion and identity; I realized the only thing those bodice-rippers had taught me was jejune thinking and to write badly. I understand young girls or teenagers reading and enjoying that genre; what I don’t understand, hindsight having such impeccable vision, is how grown, ostensibly mature women continue to make those bodice-rippers their primary literary interest.

In one dictionary, this romance genre is defined as: a novel dealing with idealized events remote from everyday life.

Let’s face it: the fairy tale never happens like that in real life. So if it’s not naïveté, then it’s compliant escapism; and what a sad commentary on a life, that one would need such callow, fanciful stories to avoid being present in it. First of all, if your life is so terrible that you need an escape from it—any escape, no matter how paltry—then it’s time to recreate your life. Shallowness, ignorance and vapidity has done little to advance the human species, and quite a bit to keep it rooted in those ideas that could bring about our demise as a civilization. The whole point of maturity is to evolve into a more knowledgeable, wise and sophisticated being. If that’s not your goal, then you are merely taking up space needed by those who are actually contributing something worthwhile to the collective whole. Caustic? You bet. I make no apologies for expecting the best out of the human race. I never understood the free pass for any other than children, animals, or those with brain damage.

I didn’t exit the birth canal with superior intelligence or the proverbial silver spoon in my mouth. In fact, my family was of the mind that one did not need higher education, and should just “go get a job.” Nonetheless, I had access to the ideas of those more discerning and intellectual, and paid attention to the messages they shared—mostly by way of the printed word. I decided early on that I wanted more from my life than the little staringatabyssone-horse town with its blue collar sensibility could provide. I looked at the precedents set by relatives and peers and pronounced them abhorrent. I stared into the abyss, the abyss stared back at me, and I spun on my heel and sprinted in the opposite direction. I wanted education. I wanted experience. I wanted to suck the marrow out of the world instead of letting it suck the marrow out of me.  I can’t say that my quest was a resounding success, but I certainly reached a point beyond that fate, having done my fair share of sucking.

I’m old enough to say that information was not so easily accessed back then. Books were the reason I made any progress at all. Not just any book, but good books.

 bookshopIn those younger, avid reader days, my idea of a perfect weekend was going to one of those quaint used bookshops with whatever allowance or income I had, and spending five hours touching books, gazing at covers,  reading blurbs and, I admit, like some atypical addict, sniffing the pages. This olfactory sentimentality has been compromised somewhat by our electronic readers. It’s just not the same,  using a Nook or Kindle. One would have to carry a screen cloth to rub off the nose prints, without ever enjoying the maudlin comfort of that book-smell. Just the smell of …what? technology? At least paper cuts are less common. Although I have to say I was rather proud of my paper cuts. I had something to show for turning all those pages. It made me feel purposeful. A badge of literary accomplishment, sequestered inside a Band-Aid.

Now, with our lighted reading devices, we can cease the quest for a proper reading lamp. Especially as you get older and those lamps are next to a bed shared with a lover or spouse…some bed-mates don’t appreciate the glare of the incandescent or fluorescent bulb, nor the ritualized nightly reading, especially after a session of lovemaking; it somehow offends their sensibilities that instead of basking in the afterglow of their amorous ministrations, you are instead basking in the glow of a lamp, continuing your bibliophilic devotionals while they lie there with a pillow over their face, feeling somehow slighted. These are the bed-mates who never enjoyed a prolonged position in my bed, it seems. They simply HAD TO understand the status of books in my life. And if not, then sayonara amigo, thanks for letting me defile you for a while…

{Guiding the tangent digression Sport Utility Vehicle back on the Stay-Focused Highway}

Over those college years in my 20′s and 30′s, throughout and around 8 years of higher education, I jammed technicalwritinginformation and facts into my head with all the fervor of true autodidact and student of life. I gained more practical experience by being often on the yearbook staff, and also worked as a reporter for several newspapers, as a newsletter editor, desktop publisher, in-house graphic artist/label designer; I was a Managing Editor for a small women’s press in Connecticut; I studied under a Bible scholar when I wanted to understand Christianity, religion and the Bible. I held several positions as a technical writer (to include a stint with Raytheon Corporate Jets, where I was in charge of creating sales, technical presentations and documents for $10 million corporate aircraft), and almost from the start, I was an Indie Author and publisher, since I was not impressed with what traditional publishers offered, nor was I at all interested in what the medium and small presses could provide. I could much more effectively publish myself and maintain creative and quality control that way. So I learned about formatting, typesetting, cover design, marketing.

All these experiences only deepened my love of learning and inevitably led to a quest for what was true, what was knowable, and what was unknown. My periodic forays into fiction-reading ultimately disappointed me. I suppose I just chose the wrong authors, but for whatever reason, I became chagrined and disillusioned with novels and novelists, even though I continued to write novels myself.

I do believe that the whole paradigm of traditional publishing will come crashing to the ground soon. It’s already losing serious altitude. They will have to reinvent themselves, change their business model, or die. Mainstream publishers will have to address the fact that authors can reach readers without their help, and keep a larger portion of the Profit Pie, as well.

Just as Indie Authors like myself have to compete with writers who are still neophytes, yet able to publish anyway, so do publishers have to get with the program and realize that there are indeed talented writers out there who have yet to make any bestseller list, or garner any blurbs in the the New York Times or Publisher’s Weekly, lauding them as a “fresh new voice in the Esoteric Apocalyptic Adventure genre.”

michaelStarkWhich brings me back to Michael Stark. Sort of. I’ve been enjoying his serialized theIsland_MichaelStarknovel, The Island. It’s delicious. Every last page. I go to sleep thinking about his book, and wake up thinking about it. And while I’m reading I am jealous, wishing I had written it. I’m getting a callous on my finger turning digital pages. It’s so refreshing to discover a writer who knows how to tell a compelling story, has masterful command of language and nuance, and character development and plotting, and still manages to take a rather glutted genre and breath new life into it. All this, seemingly without the misplaced hubris found in so many Indie authors these days. This guy is the real deal, and I hope he offers a stack of other books for me to read soon, because he has now sufficiently whetted my literary appetite, and I will want to follow his career with all the enthusiasm of that young girl who thrilled at Heinlein and Burroughs all those years ago.

2 people like this post.

Demanding Better of Lesfic

typewriteroldblack4I am reposting this here, because I was so relieved to see that someone else out there sees this issue clearly. I am hoping we can overhaul the lesbian literature environment, eventually.

From the Lynn Pierce blog….

 

 

 

Piercing Fiction: Straight Arrow Reviews
Literature, movies and whatever else occurs to me.
Sunday, April 7, 2013

It’s time to be more discriminating in the books
This is a post I made on a the group I moderate on Yahoo called Lesfic_Unbound. I’m sharing it here as a thought to put out to the community.I had contact with an author this weekend that I think needs to be shared if we truly want to see the literature get better. I suspect many of us have talked to lesbian friends about reading the books only to hear, “I tried a couple. They weren’t (very good/had too many mistakes/were poorly produced/nothing but an excuse to write about sex – you pick) so I won’t read them anymore.” The author who contacted me has quit every group she belonged to and is considering not writing anymore because, and I’m going to quote her, “I don’t know who I can trust anymore.” I suppose the fact that she reached out to me means that she thinks I can be trusted. That’s nice, but it’s not relevant to the point.

She has published more than one book, all of which got rave reviews from the standard people – friends, group members, some reviewers. She was feeling pretty pumped up. Then other reviews started coming in and they pointed out the mistakes and weaknesses in the books. Yes, one of them was a review by me. I actually thought the story was very good, but it needed some work. The author said she went back and looked more closely at her books and realized that there were some problems in them. I’ve only read one book, so I can’t speak to the others.

Anyway, the author apparently felt that the people on the groups had let her down. She was led to believe something that wasn’t quite true. Now these books are out there, with her name on them, and people are pointing out weaknesses. She’s embarrassed and didn’t know what to do. I think we settled that problem between us. I know there was a time when there weren’t many lesbian novels out there and we lapped them all up like they were honey. We cherished every one of them and applauded the authors in every way we could so that we could get more. Those were the days when I could read every lesbian novel that was published in a year in that year and did.

Those days are over. The books are flooding out now, whether from companies or indies. Some of them are truly outstanding, some are very good, some are fine for light entertainment and then some of them are just not good. I don’t mean the topic doesn’t appeal to you. You’re not into romance or mystery or science fiction. I mean they’re not good. They’re full of mistakes – words missing, misspelled words, incomplete sentences, sentences that don’t make sense – and the plots are either mundane or full of holes. I started reading a book not long ago and began telling myself that I’d already read the book, but I didn’t know how that could be because the book was a new release and I remembered reading it years ago. Then I realized that it has a plot so close to another older book that it’s difficult to distinguish them. I know there are only so many plots, but you can put fresh angles on them.

I have stacks and stacks and stacks of lesbian literature that I’ll probably never get to read now and still the books are pouring into my mailbox or onto my Kindle. Don’t we owe it to the authors? Don’t we owe it to the readers? Don’t we owe it to the literature to stop treating EVERY book like it’s a masterpiece? They aren’t all good stories. They aren’t all well produced. They aren’t all worth reading and sure not worth spending money on, I don’t care how cheap they are. Or, at least be honest about the kind of book it is. If it’s the lesbian equivalent of a Harlequin romance, just say so. Harlequin romances are tremendously popular with some people. I have no problem with that. My mother consumed them like M&Ms and it made her happy. I don’t want to read them though or I at least want to know that’s what I’m going to be reading if I buy it.

The emails with this author went on all day. I felt deeply for how she felt and I hope I gave her some suggestions that will help. Let me repeat though that she isn’t upset with the critical reviews. She’s upset with the community that told her how “wonderful” her books were when there was a lot of room for improvement. Haven’t we reached the point where we need to be more discriminating in what we say? Or do we just put up with the people who say “I tried a couple. They weren’t very good/had too many mistakes/were poorly produced/nothing but an excuse to write about sex so I won’t read them anymore.”
Posted by Lynne Pierce at 8:45 PM
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook

4 comments:
1. lesbrary.comApril 7, 2013 at 10:35 PM
WOW was this a post that needed to be written! I get that there was a point that we were glad for any lesbian book we can get, but we’re at a point where we need to start improving, and yes, clearly separating the trashy romance from the general fiction from the literary/classics. There are some fantastic lesbian books out there, but they’re lumped in with guilty pleasure reads and badly edited novels, and we need to be able to offer more to new readers, especially if we want anyone but lesbians to read these books. Thank you for writing this post, and I’ll love to hear more in this vein!

Reply
2. RebekahApril 8, 2013 at 11:20 PM
great post. i’m struggling to improve my plots and characters with every book, but as a reader this is something i’ve noticed not only with lesbian romance, but across the board. i’ve read two digital first books (one was lesbian, one hetero) from a large publisher that were full of errors. i’m talking i had to go back and reread whole paragraphs because something key was missing or the wording was just so off. plot problems, all sorts of stuff. i liked reading everything from trashy romance to epic dystopian tales, but i want the product to be clean as a reader. as an author i do want to know if my work is not as its best when it hits the reader’s hands.

Reply
3. BaxterApril 9, 2013 at 7:44 PM
Excellent post, Lynne. Exactly why you are one of the few lesfic reviewers I read. I trust you to tell me where to spend my hard-gained time and money. Thank you.

Reply
4.
Jae BaeliApril 9, 2013 at 8:26 PM
Oh, thank you thank you thank you….my partner Kate and I (both of us are authors) have been so discouraged by this very thing! -That there are so few good lesbian books, and all the lesbian readers give them five stars, even when they are HORRIBLE, for exactly the reasons you state. Where is our pride, really? It’s amazing how many lesbian books make money when they are so poorly done, and meanwhile, quality lesbian writers are overlooked or ignored. We should expect the same excellence from lesbian writers as we do from others. I addressed this issue in one of my recent blog posts: http://jaebaeli.com/blog/2013/04/lesbian-readers-writers/

Again, THANK YOU for saying this PUBLICLY, instead of perpetuating lesfic’s dirty little secret. Kelli Jae Baeli http://jaebaeli.com

Be the first to like.

Lesbian Readers & Writers

Another writer friend of mine recently posted a blog about the inordinate amount of winking that goes on in lesbian fiction.

I had to think about that….I know what she means. There are always some little irritants with those books…I just haven’t read a bad one in so long…because I…sort of…avoid bad books whenever possible. As for the winking…I may not have noticed this in lesbian books, because I really don’t read much lesfic (And like Diana, I hate that word too…in fact, I really don’t even like the word lesbian. Never have. But I guess we’re stuck with it).

catreading1Anyway, the reason I stopped reading lesbian books was because I was so frequently and so profoundly disappointed in them. (and in fact, it was the reason I started writing novels–I was so dissatisfied with lesbian fiction, and I wanted to write a book *I* would want to read).  Now, granted, I probably haven’t read enough of them to have an unbiased view–definitely not a scientific sampling….but after trying repeatedly, and finding that 9 out of 10 of them were awful, I just went back to writers I knew and respected. And yes, most of them are mainstream authors, not lesbians. I cut my literary teeth on Edgar Rice Burroughs, Edgar Allen Poe, Darian North, Raymond Obstfeld/Laramie Dunaway, Robert A. Heinlein, Dean Koontz, (and yes, some Stephen King); and most recently am enjoying Nelson DeMille and Michael Robotham. The only lesbian writer I read nowadays is Kate Genet. Yes, she’s my partner, but just know, dear reader, that I felt this way about her writing before we met, and in fact, that’s how we met. We both appreciated each other’s writing. I seem to recall liking Curious Wine quite a lot, but that’s been so long ago…and I liked books by Gabriella Goldsby and Georgia Beers….But I always know that I will not be disappointed with Kate’s work. She is brilliant, in my humble opinion. She just seems to write in lesbian sub-genres that aren’t all the rage with the masses of readers, and so doesn’t get the kudos she deserves, as far as I’m concerned. I’m sure there are some high quality lesbian writers out there, but I guess I just gave up trying to find them.

Insofar as feeling some obligation to read authors who are also SAPPHIC–I mean, who wants to slog through womanreadingbadkindlebad books, when you can just stop reading and look for something else you can really enjoy? I will never live long enough to read all the GOOD books I want to read, so if the first two pages make me roll my eyes, I put it away and look elsewhere. With the advent of self-publishing, anyone who thinks they can write, can publish, without ever paying their dues, honing their craft. I know. I have been writing for something like 25 years, and I rewrote every book I have until I could be proud of it, applying all I’d learned to make it the best book it could be. I can go back and read through my first manuscripts and literally CRINGE at the mistakes I made; how truly amateurish it was. So I kept writing, kept studying the craft of writing, paying attention to the writing of those I admired–studying them, and kept applying that learning to those stories of mine. And that process will never end. There will always be something else to learn, to make me a better writer.

Curiously, I think there is this concept among lesbian readers (and some lesbian writers) that lesbian fiction is some type of sacred cow–and should never be criticized or spoken ill of, which means, they should not be held to the same standards as all other examples of “good” writing. I wonder why that is? I won’t defend a book or give it a five star review unless I really feel it is excellent. If I am not impressed with it or even hate it, I don’t bother with a review at all. To me, posting a horrid review is less about reviewing the work, and more about making yourself feel superior in public. And besides, I don’t see the value in trashing someone else’s work. I wouldn’t want anyone to trash mine. Call it a professional courtesy. But that doesn’t mean I won’t speak my mind on my own blog. That’s what it’s for. I just won’t post it under that author’s Amazon or Smashwords listing.

Having said that, I will mention that as treacherous as these waters can be, I find most lesbian romances to be cheesy and puerile, with no regard for clever plotting, character development, or style. I stopped reading het romances for JUST THAT REASON. I usually abhor formula fiction of any kind, and the romance genre is replete with every example of what NOT to do if you want to write a really good book. Great sales and great writing aren’t always on the same tandem bicycle. Sometimes, it’s simply that there are fewer discerning readers out there, and quite a few readers who are easily impressed or entertained. I take my vocation seriously, and I wish they would too. For one thing, it would be nice if these mediocre or bad writers would learn about mechanics, spelling, grammar, sentence structure, story arc, and…how about a fresh, unique premise every now and again?

talk thru handOkay, I have probably pissed off some people by now, so maybe I should hush. It’s really awful to have to mince words simply because it might alienate someone who could be a potential reader. But then again, do I want those types as my readers? If those readers who are now huffing and puffing and busting a vein on their foreheads would give it a bit of thought, they’d see that they should be glad that I care that much about the quality of my own work. I hold myself and others to the same standard, and it’s because I want every reader to get to the end of my books and feel satisfied, knowing their time and money was not wasted.

This whole business is so populated with irony, these days, I can hardly stand it.

4 people like this post.

Thatness & Whatness – being snarky

Bound to happen….don’t know why I’m surprised. I’ve been publishing excerpts intended to market thatness&whatness2013Apr1_248Supernatural Hypocrisy. Someone just gave me a pissy little review on one of them a while ago, so I went to his site and left one of my own. Amazing what people do.

His review was on Thatness & Whatness, and only said
“Review by: Brent Adams on March 31, 2013 : star
Not impressed. Doesn’t seem well thought out or researched.”

So I looked at his wordpress site, and it was one of those generic, newly made ones with all the defaults still up, and I left a snarky comment:

“Kelli Jae Baeli on April 1, 2013 at 3:49 am said:
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Your site “doesn’t seem well-thought out or researched.” How does that feel?
Before you slam someone else’s work on smashwords, perhaps you should read the whole book rather than an excerpt–and as for your comments, it took 3 years of research-something like 475 references from reputable sources, and it was nothing BUT well-thought out and researched. I spent my whole life compiling for that book, and working on it, to some degree, and also studied under a bible scholar. So how about you keep your opinion to yourself until you know what you’re talking about?”

I just get so weary of that sort of thing. Sigh. It’s a shame that reviews can be posted by just anyone, whether they’re qualified or not, these days. In the golden yesteryears, one had to be educated in the subject area and hold a position as a reviewer with some reputable entity, before posting reviews. I guess those days are over. I do appreciate responses and reviews from readers, but sometimes, I wonder if we’d be better off without them.

1 person likes this post.

1st Review of Jael.In a Tent. With a Spike.

SHcomplete6vol_138Recently, I’ve been trying to market my 6 volume magnum opus, Supernatural Hypocrisy: The Cognitive Dissonance of a God Cosmology, as I am in the unique position of being a relatively small fish in a big pond, where that material is concerned.

Since I am no Sam Harris or Richard Dawkins or Christopher Hitchens, my name alone will not sell a book–especially one like this.I do mention this in the Author’s Note:

I am not a Bible scholar or a Ph.D.–wielding lecturer, nor a scientist. I was one semester away from a degree in Professional Writing & Editing, and intend to finish it, plus complete a Masters Degree program in writing as well, soon. The actual writing and life in general seem to have interfered with my academic pursuits. Other than that, I am just an author who is many other things, not the least of which is a voracious lifelong learner and seeker of truth. Though I have, at odd intervals, been accused of being an elitist—I think an elitist would not encourage the sharing of ideas by those without an alphabet soup after their name, a prestigious university at their back, or a mainstream publisher hawking their work. I believe everyone has something to say, and should be able to say it. It should be up to the readers whether or not the content is worthy of perusal.

In an effort to get the information out there, I decided to offer excerpts for free in eBook form, so that readers would have a chance to preview some of the material; see what the book is like, before buying. Yesterday, I published another of those excerpts, Jael. In a Tent. With a Spike –which is excerpted from Volume 4, Cosmology Of The Dark Side: Hell, Satan & Misguided Jael.InaTent.withaSpike2013Mar30_232x344Adherents. The blurb for it is:

Directed at agnostics and those struggling with the inconsistencies in Christianity in particular, and religion in general, an author struggles to find her own Personal Cosmology by examining and sharing her beliefs and discoveries about God, the Bible and Christianity.

In this excerpt, Baeli responds to an online pastor’s site. “During some research, I came across a page that stopped me in my cyber-tracks. It’s the most hateful, war-mongering, misogynistic, atavistic, hate-crime supporting, and sickening example of Christian brainwashing I’ve ever seen. And it’s intended for kids.”

When I woke to start my day this morning, there was a Review Notification from Smashwords. Already? My first thought was, Okay, here we go. Some Bible-thumper is going to lambast me with admonitions and warnings that I will burn in their loving god’s hell for such blasphemy.…so it was a pleasant surprise to instead see this:

Review by: David H. Keith on March 30, 2013 : star star star star star
At last, someone with the courage to take these charlatans and hate-mongers to task, and to do it with eloquence and the sarcasm these would-be “holy” men so richly deserve. Good on you, Ms. Baeli! Good on you.

Of course, you do know that you are now the target of all these soldiers of their Ghod, don’t you? Well, you are not alone. It is way past time these criminals are called to account and you have done so with effect. My hat is off to you.

Five stars without hesitation.

David H. Keith
www.novemberfirstpublications.weebly.com

My thanks to Mr. Keith.

I know there are plenty of people out there who are at least agnostic, whether they know it or not. And there are plenty of others who have always questioned the veracity of religion, but these days, who has the time to research it? Well, since I am a writer, and I did have the time, and I was on my own personal journey in that regard, I felt it was a good idea to get a book out of it. I just never imagined the books would have to be 6 volumes, and take me 3 years, off and on, to write. I had to take breaks from the project, because it was so overwhelming. I studied more disciplines in that span of time than in all my college years combined.

Anyway, I suppose releasing these free eBooks is a way of directing people toward a purchase of this book I worked so hard on, and don’t have the big name to sell much of.

There are two more available, so far as well…

The First Family (Adam & Eve & Sons)

and Science Vs. The Flood

 

 

Be the first to like.

Irony-Fest on Giving it Away

criticnametagWelcome to the Irony-Fest, please sign in and wear your name tags.

This topic has become a comedy of ironies.

Herein lies the oft-repeated back-handed compliments and erroneous and mixed opinions we authors often deal with, in relation to our work. It seems that some readers just don’t understand nor appreciate what authors are offering, and why. And they don’t seem to understand the function of short works in this regard. Would that we could be treated with the same respect that other professions enjoy, without  suffering the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune.

In one blog, Distracting Fiction: Brand Vs. Generic, I tackled the criticism of including brand names of things in my stories,  in another, Diversify & Die, I address the challenges of marketing yourself and why I started concentrating on writing in just one major genre, and in another, Stranger Fiction, Reviews & Truthiness, I said “Historically, there has been a notable chasm between the author’s craft and the reading public’s knowledge of what that craft includes” and discussed the odd complaints of readers who missed critical nuances and story elements, and in Bloody Hands, I revealed the intensely personal emotional development a writer must have in order to write well, and the abject vulnerability that revealing yourself on the page entails.

Imagine my dismay when, in the second review of Giving it Away : Spoilers as Both Noun & Accusation (Why Book Reviews Matter & How to Write a Proper One), I found:

Review by: (MT) on March 19, 2013 : star star star star
This book is 10 pages and 20+ promotional pages for the author’s other work. It is a short read. It goes a little long on don’t give away spoilers. The meat of the book for me was in two pages. The author gives useful tips on doing reviews. Which I plan to use in the future when reviewing ficiton. Thanks for your work. Your other books look interesting as well.
(review of free book)

In the first review, this:

Review by: DHK on March 19, 2013 : star star star starstar 

I found this book timely, although a bit vague and short on specifics. I’m not knocking the book – it’s only some 5100 words long, after all – but simply saying Baeli could have done more with it even if that entailed a much larger book. I think the topic itself – writing thoughtful reviews – is certainly something that needs addressing and I applaud Baeli for beginning that conversation. I hope she expands it into something a new reviewer can keep readily to hand just as one should a good dictionary or manual for one’s primary job.

DHK
(Website)

Yes, the MT review, she gave it 4-stars, (thank you) and she did say something nice in the last few sentences, (thanks again) but also seemed troubled by the fact that the article was short, and had promotional material in it.  [IRONY ALERT] she also said at the end of the review that my other books looked interesting…um, wasn’t that the material at the back of the book she complained about? I included that extra data for both marketing reasons, and because [IRONY ALERT] I wanted to be able to toss more in there for the reader, so it wouldn’t seem they were getting nothing for something, even though they were actually getting something for nothing, because the eArticle was FREE.

Then she said it also  “goes a little long on don’t give away spoilers” when [IRONY ALERT] the article was ABOUT SPOILERS.

Why do some readers seem offended when we add information in the back of the book about our other work? Do they not understand that this is our vocation, and the goal is to sell the creations we toil over? Don’t we have the same right as others to advertise the fruits of our talent and hard work? And when we offer some of our writing for free in order to do that, why is that such a burr under their saddles? And why do they seem pissy that a SHORT work of say, 10 pages, is not LONGER, when it’s not intended to be a thorough examination of a subject, and the download of it is even FREE????

bangheadwall1

 

In the FIVE star DHK review, he said the “book” was “a bit vague…” (when there was nothing vague about it, even though I had said in the book blurb, “This is one time when you should be vague.”) Isn’t it ironic? Doncha think?

He also said the article was “short on specifics”  while the MT review said it “goes a little long on don’t give away spoilers” (when that was indeed the TOPIC of the article). DHK said, “Baeli could have done more with it even if that entailed a much larger book”  when it wasn’t a book, but a short article, and the intent, clearly stated, was that it was a micro-topic, not a topic under a microscope.

As I said in the previous blog post, I don’t have TIME to devote to expanding nonfiction subjects, even though I have published quite a few nonfiction books, with a list of them still sitting unfinished, as I am busy writing full-length novels, for which I hope to get quality reviews from those who know how to properly WRITE a review, which is what this article was about. If they want full-length works exclusively, I could point them to 33 of my other BOOKS.

Oh, and did I mention that the article WAS FREE?

All this, after a collection of respected and qualified authors posted thanks and kudos for what I was sharing in that article, the author and board member of Lambda Literary Foundation, KG MacGregor, sent me an email saying “Thanks so much for your blog on spoiler reviews. As a board member at Lambda Literary Foundation, I forwarded it to our LL Review editor and asked him to share it with our reviewers. That’s the best set of questions I’ve ever seen!”

So much for the mistaken concept that you can please everyone, which is also something I said in the article:

But remember that we writers can’t please everyone, we can only write the stories we feel compelled to write, and hope there are those who are interested in reading them. And more importantly, writing well is hard work; we pour ourselves into the job, and we have feelings, just like you do.

And in the blog before this, I asked the burning question: Ironically, I wonder what the reviews for his publication will be like?

I’m beginning to think that we authors need a place to review the reviews  on our books. Hardly seems fair that the public at large can say what they want about our work, even if it’s erroneous or misinterpreted, and we just have to sit there like we’re in the dunking booth at the county fair.

Be the first to like.

Giving it Away:1st review

So, got the first review on the eArticle I published today on Smashwords. The article is

Giving it Away : Spoilers as Both Noun & Accusation
(Why Book Reviews Matter & How to Write a Proper One)

 

Creativity GivingitAway2013Mar18_138Review by: David H. Keith on March 19, 2013 : starstarstarstarstar
I found this book timely, although a bit vague and short on specifics. I’m not knocking the book – it’s only some 5100 words long, after all – but simply saying Baeli could have done more with it even if that entailed a much larger book.

I think the topic itself – writing thoughtful reviews – is certainly something that needs addressing and I applaud Baeli for beginning that conversation. I hope she expands it into something a new reviewer can keep readily to hand just as one should a good dictionary or manual for one’s primary job.

David H. Keith
www.novemberfirstpublications.weebly.com

I wanted to write to the reviewer, David H. Keith, and thank him, but most of his links don’t work, and could not find any contact info for him elsewhere…so thought i would respond here.

First, if you find this, thanks for your review, David. Next, let me just point out that it wasn’t a “book” I published, but an article which was necessarily brief. I wish I had had the time to commit to expanding the idea, but I’ve been very busy writing full-length books, ironically. LOL. And nonfiction is something I’m trying to spend less time on, as I’ve made a commitment to fiction for now. As for the article being vague–not sure what was vague about it, but I suppose you can’t please everyone, which is something i mentioned, again ironically, in the article to which David refers.

Nonetheless, I’m glad he was able to eke out some value in the article, and I appreciate his taking time to jot off a review. Stay tuned. This is shaping up to be an expanding discussion. One can only hope it gains meme status, so that hard-working authors can be treated with the respect they deserve.

Toodles.

Jae

Be the first to like.

Giving it Away Giveaway

In response to the unusual interest paid to one of my recent blogs, Giving it Away: Spoilers as Both Noun & Accusation,

I decided I  would publish that entry in digital form, so I could spread the word. I will be offering it for free download –that’s right: Giving it Away, will be GIVEN AWAY>

on Smashwords, and on Amazon, too, hoping they match the FREE price. Otherwise, Amazon might list it for .99 at first. But I felt this information was too important, and it needed to be available to those who would write book reviews.

from the article:

Author’s Note

ThiCreativity GivingitAway2013Mar18_138s article stemmed from an ongoing issue with book reviews. It became apparent that most reviewers did not understand what the intent of book reviews were, nor how to write a proper one. Even in the case of positive reviews, often the reviewer would accomplish something counter-productive, by including spoilers that kept other readers from buying a book, or enjoying it. A great deal of the enjoyment to be found in fiction, is through the author’s ability to surprise the reader with plot twists and turns. If the reviewer reveals all of these in a review, the story is then compromised, and this leads to fewer sales for the hard-working, conscientious author, and an undermining of other reader’s ability to fully enjoy the story. I have made this article free for purchase through various vendors, in the hope that it will help alleviate at least a portion of this ongoing modern problem in the area of fiction and book publishing.

 

Title: Giving it Away : Spoilers as Both Noun & Accusation (Why Book Reviews Matter, & How to Write a Proper One)

Description: Good authors spend a lot of energy and time on constructing a plot and providing surprises to keep the reader engaged and entertained– when you come along and tell those twists and turns and outcomes, you have just spoiled it for anyone else–which is why it’s called a SPOILER. This is one time when you should be vague.

Ironically, I wonder what the reviews for his publication will be like?

typingsmile

 

 

 

2 people like this post.

Glaring Errors

 

bloodyhandscratch_cropThis is a wide subject area, but I want to focus on just a few things.

As a segue, I have to share this post I came across. I was on a forum where people were posting for help about making money blogging. One poster was frustrated and confused and posted this:

“Been using these for over a year and made 2 penies.  How do I earn money on goggle.  It is simply frostrating.  I posted so many adds  on my blog but I have earned no money. what is happening? I have been trying to write all the rite types of subjects,and no one buys. the codes is on the page but the adds are never seen I geuss.what am I doing wrong.what do I need to do.”

 

whack{you need to give up, right now, before anyone else gets hurt. The Grammar Nazis are watching….}

Now, no one had the heart to tell this guy the truth. I almost did, but realized it would just make me seem like a pompous ass. It probably wouldn’t have helped anyway. Anyone who writes a short post and has, at my first count, 13 obvious errors, not to mention the errors in INTELLECT, can never expect to make money as a writer.

It baffles me how so many people think that writing is a cush job. It’s hard work just like any other profession. But if you can’t spell, can’t construct proper sentences, and generally present yourself as a moron (because, of course, you ARE a moron), you will have no luck. You have to possess a command of language in a broad sense, and an understanding of human nature–what’s interesting and what is not–and your ideas about plot points and events in general have to be unique or at least rendered in an interesting or entertaining way. There are plenty of talented writers out there, and THOSE are the ones you will really be competing with, not the frostrated [sic] imbecile quoted above…

Still, it bears mentioning that presentation is just as important as content, because if your presentation sucks, no one will read your content.

Notwithstanding the Village Idiots out there, in a manuscript, Glaring Errors can pop up frequently, just by virtue of the length of the work. That’s why you have to be doubly careful to check and recheck your writing. (And as I typed that, I was terrified that perhaps I had used too many commas in that sentence…there’s a down eatingcrowside to criticizing someone else’s writing, when you’re WRITING your criticism. It pays to invest in a good helmet, quality running shoes, and to develop a taste for crow).

One example of this need for vigilance, is when a character or element or object is mentioned, described, given a bit of backstory, and then halfway through the book, this character/element/object disappears, and it has nothing to do with the plot (for instance, there are no magicians or wizards populating your pages). This usually happens when the natural evolution of the plot might cause this thing to vanish unintentionally. If you’re an organic writer like me, the story will take you places you didn’t plan, and sometimes certain people, places, or things will become unimportant. Always go back to the beginning and read over it, with an eye toward catching those absconding Nounages…(yes, go ahead and notify the nearest Grammar Nazi. I made that up, and am prepared to take my demerits).greyhound

I had a character in one of my novels (Achilles Forjan) who owned a dog she was very fond of. The animal was with her frequently. Then, as the story morphed and took on a life of its own, I noticed that the dog had evaporated. This would qualify as a Glaring Error.

Sometimes the Glaring Error is that a character’s name or physical description changes. This is often caused by the act of changing a character’s name and then missing some instances of it. That happened to me in another novel, As You Were, – before I changed that character’s name because it was too close to another character’s name in another of my books (Armchair Detective). When I changed that main character’s name, using global Find and Replace, I forgot that there were instances of it in the possessive form (i.e., “Beth’s”) and the replace feature didn’t find it. So you have to be mindful of that, so that your reader won’t snag on it, and say who the hell is Beth?

Also remember that sometimes another character uses that character’s name, and so the instance would be “Beth,” –you have to watch for that too. And the same goes for text like, “Beth, always aware of the unusual, “  That comma keeps search from finding Beth all by itself. That’s where the variations on FIND and REPLACE in Microsoft Word can be helpful. (And if you’re a writer, you should be using MS Word. It is the most versatile MSwordFindreplaceand powerful word processing program–more on that in another article).

But to avoid a character name error like this to begin with, you should have at least a clear vital stats sheet on each of your characters to refer to while writing, although sometimes your muse won’t always allow you to do that, and that’s not necessarily a bad thing. (More on that in another article as well).  Just be mindful of this and the other glaring errors that can disrupt the clarity and quality of the writing to which you attach your name. It is often permanent, and you can’t take it back. Although, with the advent of today’s self-publishing, those errors can usually be corrected and the file re-uploaded. That’s both good and bad–that anyone can publish, not that you can correct errors. (More on that, too, in still another article.)

Be the first to like.

Reading, Muses, Curses & the Pick-A-Project-Polka.

 

Since completing the third and fourth books (simultaneously) of the AKA Investigations series, I am doing that Writers-blockPick-A-Project-Polka; a dance we writers do when we’re trying to decide what we feel like working on next; we listen to our muse, we dance with our muse, we kick our muse out and get practical, and we sometimes curse our muse and send it to bed without dinner. All of these I’ve done this time around, as well.

Fortunately, I seem to have spent enough time on a particular draft to safely assume it’s the one I will be finishing next. I have always had a collection of half-written books that one day I intend to finish (Quintessence, Somewhere Else, and Another Justice, to name a few). Most writers can probably say that. But the interesting thing is being faced with tangible examples of how far you’ve come as a writer. Stories I recalled as really good, needing to be finished because of their value, I now look at, and consider them lining for a birdcage.

Take the one I’m rewriting, now….it started out years ago as The Curse of Madagascar. Then the TV series, Lost, began to air and I was afraid I’d be accused of plagiarism to some degree, if I tried to publish that story, even though I had written it years before the TV series came about.  The book was about a straight couple, newlyweds, who are on their way to Saint-Denis, in Africa for their honeymoon, and instead get stranded on a tropical island (Madagascar, though they don’t know where they are) after their transport boat sinks. They battle a shark, then get on shore with nothing, and struggle to survive in an environment that is filled with strange creatures, is unfriendly and mysterious, and soon discover there is something sinister going on, and their lives are in danger, because there are some villainous men who are using the island for….er…um…

Here is where the story fizzled (Honestly, it fizzled from the get-go, but for the sake of explanation–) I needed to pinpoint what the “curse” in the title referred to….

Originally, it was in third person omniscient, then I changed it to third person limited. Originally, it was also set in Africa, but then I decided I didn’t want to spend the research time necessary to write anything about a setting I knew little about, and opted instead to change the setting to Cache La Poudre, a wilderness area in Northern Colorado. I am familiar with my home state. Also, at different times it was about drugs, human trafficking, and I even considered something supernatural, likecatfacekeyboard the island was a living entity somehow, and perhaps it was a sort of purgatory, and my characters were already dead, but in some alternate reality after death (See? Very similar to Lost). It hardly mattered what my story was about, though, because the whole shebang was a cheese-fest. Dialogue smarmy and uber-romanticized, like something out of a bad Harlequin (not to suggest there was ever a GOOD Harlequin). But I noticed all the stereotyping I was doing, with gender-roles. I, of course, had to have the man save the woman, and she was, of course, weak and frightened and only able to feel safe while in his arms. Repugnant, all around.

[finger in my throat, and a retching noise].

So then, in the spirit of focusing my writing endeavors on the one genre (lesbian), and more importantly, in the spirit of putting my name only on stories I’m not ashamed of, I decided to rewrite what I already had on this story and finish it.

One rewrite focus area, as mentioned, was the dialogue–cheese-be-gone….another was the sentence structure. Too same-same, too often. Then I ran into that whole stylistic quagmire of having two females in almost every repeatkeyscene and getting tired of using “she” and “her” so having to fix that with sentence structure, and stylistic tricks. Another was beginning paragraphs and sentences with the same word repeatedly, over and over, again and again, until it became a repetitious, recapitulation, reiteration, replay, reproduction, rerun, reshowing and also a duplication.  Amazing, the little lessons we learn about our craft that we hardly notice until being faced with them in the form of our own literary apparitions, ghost stories from the past. My muse was quite wispy and frail back then. Largely attributable to my early years of reading too many of the aforementioned romance novels, and also watching too many soap operas. I learned how to write poorly from both (these sorts of things also have a way of retarding your intellect, as well). My writing only improved when I began to read more accomplished, masterful authors. Like Edgar Allen Poe, Edgar Rice Burroughs, Robert A. Heinlein and later, Dean Koontz (in whom I have lost interest in recent years, perhaps because his writing has become a little tedious–though I did learn a great deal by studying his writing, to find out what he was doing to get me to turn that page every time).

In fact, most of my reading experiences have been about finding a set of authors I could follow; but they were few and far between, and so I read widely in many genres, and ultimately discarded most of them after reading only one of their books.  It takes quite a lot to get me to turn a page, and if it’s not a strong enough pull, I will lay that book down and move on. I’ve always felt that there were not enough years in my life to read everything I want to read, so I am loath to read anything that isn’t a valuable use of my time. I can see how all of these experiences have shaped me as a writer.

I’ve always enjoyed the Maximum Ride series by James Patterson, even though I don’t usually read in the Youngplumisland_DeMille Adult genre. I found those books hugely entertaining and delightful and quick-reading, which was what I wanted at the time. And more recently, I enjoyed Gone Girl, by Gillian Flynn, but was disappointed in the cop-out ending–a particularly potent peeve of mine. And I have only a few days ago, discovered Nelson DeMille, and he’s shaping up to be a favorite, if this book, Plum Island, continues to be as good as it has been from page-one. I’m excited about this possibility, since I see the stacks and stacks of books he has just waiting for my hungry eyes to explore.

Over the last ten years or so, I’ve read far more nonfiction than fiction. I read many books by authors like Christopher Hitchens, Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins, Carl Sagan, George Smith, Stephen Hawking, and other authors in the science and atheism category, as well as a plethora of social psychology. It seemed to influence me to write nonfiction, which is why I strayed from the market and over-diversified myself into lower royalties.

But I was in a self-imposed curriculum, my own university, and the studies I did in religion, alone, would have garnered me a degree, if I had been doing it in an actual collegiate setting–perhaps a master’s thesis equivalent, in the three years it took me to write my 6-volume magnum opus, Supernatural Hypocrisy: The Cognitive Dissonance of a God Cosmology.  Additionally, I published a book of poetry (Yin & Yang: Poetry from Both Sides of my Disposition), a memoir (Falling through the Cracks: This Misadventures of No One Famous) compiled all my essays into volumes, (Like Too Much World, and Wear a Helmet, and Bettered by a Dead Crustacean) and even a volume of essays about writing in Don’t Fall in Love With Your Words (Fall in Love With Your Craft). I wrote a few nonfiction books for lesbians,  like ISO (In Search Of): The Art of Dating, Relationships & Sex for the Discerning Lesbian and Sullied Pajamas: A Discerning Lesbian on Dating, Relationships & Sex.

Throughout all this abandonment to the whims of my muse, I learned a great deal about the craft of writing and of the discipline of publishing and editing, but I was not being wise about the market. I said I didn’t care about that, I made enough money writing what I wanted to write, with no regard for what was popular. But then the royalties crashed when the ebook market opened up and my print books stopped selling while my electronic versions increased instead; but I was now competing with a whole horde of Indie authors, the successful ones of whom were writing series fiction and sticking to one genre. I had, as I said, diversified myself right out of a paycheck. And I was getting really fond of that extra money. Hopefully my rededication to one genre, and focus on series, will get me back on track.

Sales are surprisingly good for my two new ones Also Known as Syzygy and Also Known as Rising and Falling, which are numbers 3 and 4 on the AKA Investigations series. This tells me that there were readers out there justfingerscrossedkeyboard_324 waiting for me to continue that series. And I will continue to do that, while developing other series in the subgenres of lesbian fiction, and making most of them novellas since the trend seems to be shorter books, now. I guess people don’t have or make much time to read these days. Until then, I must keep my focus, and not stray into territory that I can’t occupy in a formidable way, and hope to gain an appreciable piece of the literary pie in that fashion.

Fingers crossed, when not typing.

 

Be the first to like.

Diversify and Die

Kate_Dunedin_BeachNov12_480It’s so satisfying to sit at my desk and write to the sound of the ocean. Only this time, it’s not in my earbuds, but outside my window. Our move to Dunedin placed us within walking distance of the beach, and the rhythmic breath of the waves at shore soothes me. The cool, robust breeze from the water sometimes spits through our windows like a fire hose, but it helps regulate the temperature in this upstairs master suite, high above almost all other houses on this hillside. It’s Summer here, though luckily for me, the fall and winter-loving, heat-intolerant moi, there really hasn’t been much heat yet. Weather is weird everywhere, as I understand it.

Anyway, we’re finally settling in to our new home (not new, per se, but new to us), and we can both feel the pull of literary pursuits, engendered by the sense that the busy work of our lives calmed down, and we are able to deskpic16DDec12_320finally create some normal routines.

In OneNote, I have a tabbed list of blog ideas, just waiting for me to finish. Not so different from all the book ideas I also have–started or half-completed –just waiting for my attention. The problem isn’t that I don’t want to give my attention to them, it’s that I don’t have enough attention to go around. I really do look forward to the day when I can clone myself.

(Though Kate says in matters of sex, that would give her a heart attack.) teehee

That being said, (much to Kate’s chagrin) I will now give my attention to this blog post….

Kate and I talked a while back, before the move, about our writing–what our goals are, and the changes we are anticipating having to make.

In my quest to learn the craft of writing, I thought it would be helpful if I had the ability to write in any genre. bookgenresThus, over the years, I have managed to produce work in myriad categories. Fourteen, at last count. But it has become clear to me in recent months that my approach has not been wise. This diversification has only managed to erode the ground under my literary feet, and prevent me from getting a proper foothold in the market–especially when so many other writers have established theirs. And they are the ones who enjoy better sales. There’s a reason for that.

DeanKoontzspinesIt seems that most of THOSE-WHO-READ (myself included, though I made the error of thinking other readers behaved differently) tend to pick the type of book or author they like, or both, and then they continue to read that book/author. When they run out of an author’s work, they seek other authors who write in a similar genre and/or with a similar style. Thus, the readers who buy my books have read whichever genre of mine they are drawn to, and then discover there isn’t another book in that genre from me, and they move on to find those other authors they might also like who have books available which they have not read. This does not encourage a strong, growing readership.

Also, in diversifying myself as an author, I have failed to brand myself well enough to create the following that mybooks2012shelf_1268medprobably would have existed by now, after 29 books. Had those 29 books been in one genre, I would not have taken such a hit when digital publishing swelled to its current oceanic level. According to factzone.com, in America, a new book is published every 13 minutes. This groundswell of publishing is attributable to the ease with which we can now publish our work. Yes, that means more bad books from bad writers mucking up the booklist for the rest of us, but it also means more freedom, and demands that we employ smart-marketing techniques. Hence, the issue at hand with my diversification.

My highest sales occurred when I was writing in one genre for an extended period of time and had not gotten off that beaten path yet into nonfiction, for instance. Subsequently, my sales dropped. And right when I was getting used to having that rather large paycheck every month.

Kate also feels she needs to focus more on the mainstream horror genre she prefers to write in, and not give so much attention to the lesbian genre, which for a horror author, is a very small piece of the royalty pie. Not exactly a thriving subgenre yet.

The new plan for me is to refocus my energies on the lesbian fiction genre, even though I might not always write the same subgenre inside that. I need to rebrand myself as the author of a particular genre, and keep putting out books for it. It will mean rewriting what I have on five or six or seven partially completed books in order to fit my chosen genre, but the effort will probably be worth it. And I have noticed, in reframing those other stalled books, that it would solve the issues that stagnated them in the first place. Some of them were for the mainstream market and I just could not seem to get past a certain point with them. I suspect, because I should have been sticking with the one genre instead of branching out. Hopefully it will put me back on track to producing more books, more frequently.

{Cracking knuckles.} Now back to work.

typing2

3 people like this post.

As You Were: “well written and highly enjoyable romance, mystery and intrigue, with a light touch of humor”

Review

As You Were by Kelli Jae Baeli

Singer/songwriter Tru Morgan is totally in love with her live in girl friend Brittany (Brit) Jabot. Together they share a wonderful home on Red Mountain, Colorado. Their lives are idyllic, filled with their dreams, romantic nights and  riding their beloved horses in a fairy tale, snowy setting. Life just couldn’t get much better for them……. Until one day, a malicious chain of events ends up being the indirect cause cause of a tragic accident.

Tru finds herself fighting to find the life she once had with Brit. This in itself is an uphill struggle, but add to it disruptive outside influences and it is going to be almost an impossibility. Some people just do not want to see Tru and Brit back together.

The question that has to be asked is…. Will Tru and Brit ever find their way back to the love so callously torn from them?

A well written and highly enjoyable romance, mystery and intrigue, with a light touch of humor. Although this story is basically a romance, there is so much more packed into it. So many twists and turns and ups and downs, it’s a real rollercoaster ride of highs and lows. I simply couldn’t put this book down and couldn’t turn the pages fast enough. I had to force myself to slow down. I wouldn’t advise starting this late at night, unless you don’t need to sleep.

***

The two main characters, Tru and Brit are poles apart throughout most of the book. I don’t want to put in any spoilers, but the emotional ride they are on, is hard going for them. The only thing I will say is, I wasn’t disappointed with the outcome of the story.

All the characters in the book were well formed and they each played their parts in progressing the story forward. The scenic descriptions made it easy to visualize being amongst the characters while the story evolves.

One thing I particularly liked about this book is the way we saw how Tru and Brit got together in the first instance in flashbacks. I do like to know the background of the characters.

This is the first book I’ve read by this author, now that I’ve found her, I’ll definitely be buying more.

 

=================
As You Were is available at

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Be the first to like.

Building Character- A Review of new novel by Kate Genet

Writing teachers will tell you that a novel should begin in medias res–in the middle of the action. While I do believe this is preferable, if the story allows it, I don’t believe it should be chiseled in stone–good writers know enough about the craft, to understand when the rules are meant to be broken. I’ve never been a big fan of formula fiction, unless an author can take that formula and do something new with it. And while I wouldn’t consider Building Character “formula fiction” per se, there are will be some formulas in every book; I am interested in the conventions that stray from it, as this is a good thing. Genet knows how to do that, and she does with her own personal flair and expertise.

In regard to the caveat of in medias res in Building Character, the whole story is in the middle of the action. From the first two paragraphs, I could tell that something delicious was building. And I appreciated the author for giving me a firm grasp on the main character, so that it would make perfect sense and still be delightful. The discerning reader will be able to sense that Genet is illuminating Fen Marshall in a particular way, and for a particular purpose, and the more we learn about Fen’s idiosyncrasies, the more intriguing and exciting the ensuing plot promises to be.

In a world permeated with the sensibility of instant gratification, and literary caveats that tell writers they must begin a book by grabbing the readers by the throat–I suspect because of the aforementioned instant gratification propensity–I must warn the reader that Building Character does not begin with a car chase or an arrow in the heart, nor any explosions, earthquakes or tsunamis, nor a character dangling from the ledge of a 10 story structure by her fingertips. It begins with a character. And it’s crucial to understand who she is in order to appreciate what happens, and how she evolves. Yet in doing this character development, Genet does not bore us with play-by-play or tedious details, but only with details that develop character, and move the story toward that first tipping point, and then pulls us along to each ensuing tipping point, until the end of every page is an irresistible invitation to continue to the page beyond.

The title of this novel is key to the many levels that exist inside the story. Genet builds a character for the reader, expertly, and with finesse. The main character, as an author herself, builds a character, who becomes a unique and intriguing antagonist. And the main character also builds her own character, as she maneuvers the obstacles presented by this vixen-cum-succubus, Ruby, which Genet (masquerading as Fen) brings to light.

While I could not identify personally with Fen on all levels, since she is an odd character with certain quirks, who does not enjoy the company of other people, nor seek love, I immediately loved her. I could relate to the often taxing nature of other people, and how they can suck the energy out of you. I also understood the need for time and space to create, and the almost holy nature of my home as sanctuary. I am not cut from the same cloth as Fen Marshall, but the cloth shares many of the same colors. I understood her, and was at once intrigued, enamored and entertained by her peculiarities and defenses.

The characters of Fen, Ruby, and Marissa were brilliant, and masterful manifestations of the darker elements of the human psyche, though the antagonists Ruby and Marissa were disturbing in two completely different ways. I have known quite a few people like Marissa, and like Ruby as well, except that I might not have seen the Rubys in this world as clearly as Genet sketches her, as I run screaming in the other direction before becoming entrenched with them. It’s this entrenchment on the part of Fen that gets her in so much trouble. By the time she realizes the untapped desires and blind spots that Ruby ignites, she has been sucked to the event horizon of that black hole, and is inches away from spiraling into the abyss of intrigue, lust, and the epiphany of awakened erotic hunger. This can be a force both ominous and all-encompassing.

Genet is well aware of her target audience–mostly lesbians and open-minded others who delight in a thought-provoking and entertaining read. I found Marissa’s behavior in the book very credible, and I immediately recognized her from my own personal experience with obsessive women. I can say that her abnormal ideation was spot-on. This assessment is supported by any psychologist you might care to contact, as well. If a reader has limited experience and knowledge of this psychological aspect of the subject matter, they might be surprised that these things really do happen (not manifesting a person out of sheer force of will, of course, but of how the human mind operates). The female psyche has its own nature, and I appreciated the subtle shading and color contrasts of the character-portraits Genet was painting, as well as the more specific subset of love and passion between two women, and the obsessional aspects inherent in each realm. This book is written by a highly intelligent author who deals with some profound subjects, and thus, to truly appreciate it on all its myriad levels, you must be able to appreciate nuance and understand a bit about human nature and psychology.

The classic conflicts in literature, which we all learn in school, is a character against an antagonist, a character against society, a character against nature, and a character against herself. Building Character embodies all of these conflicts, and is expertly rendered by Genet, woven into the story in such a seamless way, that (as an author myself) I was envious of her skill. Add the elements of the supernatural, psychological suspense, and of course the not-so-common lesbian erotica, well-wrought, and you have a book that can be enjoyed by those from many walks of life. For it speaks to us on our most fundamental level; reminds us that what we create does have a life of its own, and we should be mindful of the power it can have, the havoc it can wreak, and the lesson it can teach us about hubris and the corrupting nature of need, desire and loneliness. You can fall in love with the wrong person just like you can NOT fall in love with the right one. And it is in this precarious balance that Genet reveals the meat of the story. In good fiction, there must be conflict, an attempt to ease the conflict, or exacerbation of conflict, and resolution of conflict. Genet orchestrates these elements adroitly.

With titillating and absolutely carnal and scorching sexual encounters fraught with deeper meaning, clean, picturesque prose and realistic, interesting dialogue, along with clever and exciting plotlines, Building Character was like great food to me. Delicious, perfect texture and taste, pleasing presentation, and in the end, so satisfying that it takes a place in your mind as one of your all-time favorite meals. I encourage everyone who appreciates quality writing to imbibe this wonderful book like the literary white chocolate that it is.

1 person likes this post.

Kate Genet’s new book!

 

I encourage all my readers to please go buy a copy of Kate Genet’s new book, Building Character.

Here’s a link to the interview on her blog about it, and links to get it. It’s brilliant, truly.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Be the first to like.

Neuro-Geological Translocation Syndrome (with a side of Hope-smothered Fear)

Melissa Etheridge is Brave & Crazy. Why not me?

If I could have my way I’d check out right now I’d say out to lunch honey thanks a bunch It wouldn’t work out anyhow But this desire’s too much It’s rented out my brain It’s showing previews of your body Driving me insane And that’s crazy So all that I can do Is to beg, plead, won’t you tell me please What am I gonna do About you Brave….and crazy…

The changes on my personal horizon are formidable. And I’m not oblivious enough to march blithely through my life with no regard for the value of reality checks. I have my feet firmly in reality all the time, except for those moments when I knowingly allow my more fanciful nature to take over. Reality and Fancifulness… I’m knee deep in Fanciful Reality, I suppose, because both are happening right now. I am allowing my heart to feel, to have hope, to dream of the future wistfully, rather than claw away from the future in nightmares. And I am planning, thinking, devising, strategizing, researching, brainstorming to make it all happen in the quickest, most painless way possible.

On one side, there’s this person who came into my life like full-blown technicolor against the backdrop of grayscale, and she gave me back my hope.  She exemplified the tenuous nature of love, and how any alternative path or decision, no matter how minute, might mean the difference between meeting your soulmate and not meeting her. She embodies the Quixotic list of characteristics i made years ago, when considering what the perfect mate for me would be like. And on the other side, there are so many unknowns. So many things that are for me a collection of the most terrifying specters possible for someone like me. I am aware that I tend to have a lengthy list of things that scare me. This, even though I think I have fleeting moments of courage. One friend once said to me, during my relocation to Denver, “You are the bravest person I know.” I didn’t really think I deserved the label. I had to ask her why and she pointed out that I had picked up and moved to another state, all alone, knowing no one there, dealing with all of it myself, 30 hours of driving, and while also being a person prone to panic attacks–and all because I wanted to find my life partner, and I just knew she had to be out there somewhere. Well, fair enough. I guess that was brave. Maybe I am brave. Maybe I’m also a little crazy. Brave and crazy. It continues to come back to that. Perhaps the battle between love and fear requires brave and crazy.

I have been experiencing anxiety, what can be described as a low frequency humming in my consciousness that underlies all other emotions. Not surprising, since the usual paradigm of my life has been up-ended. All my comfort zones infiltrated by possibility, but also the unknown. And isn’t it the unknown that most often frightens us? I would never have imagined visiting another country–the idea was at once frightening to me. And yet, here i am making plans to not just visit, but MOVE to another country–one at “the bottom of the world” as AmericaCentrics are fond of saying. New Zealand.  My Kiwi partner and I often rib each other about those perspectives:

“You’re at the bottom of the world…”

“No YOU are.”

…and even had this conversation, which I shamelessly used in our upcoming co-authoring project, Hanging the Moon:

Lily took a curve, and Jade’s hand went involuntarily to the dash, as if expecting an impact. “This is so weird because you’re on the wrong side of the road.”

“No, ” Lily quipped back. “I’m on the left side of the road.”

“Right, which is the wrong side.”

“No it’s the right side.”

Jade shot back, “I thought you said it was the left side?”

They both burst out laughing with delight.

I admit to a generous portion of fear in my brain. I am afraid of heights. I am afraid of flying. Afraid of being helpless, trapped. Of not being in control of my immediate environment. Most of this stems from my brain architecture as an HSP with Sensory Processing Sensitivity. But for me, as I try to discern what this feeling is like–this moving to another country– it feels like migrating to another planet. An earthlike planet where the locals speak English, even though a modified version filled with colloquialisms with which I am not familiar, and with accents derived from Britain. It’s not like the air there will have different percentages of oxygen or hydrogen, nor that the grass is blue and the sky green, nor that I will be required to learn how to maneuver in a space suit. Nothing so dramatic as that. But there will be, I surmise, a certain geographical confusion that will take some getting used to.

That even happened as I arrived in Denver the first time. It seemed so HUGE, and I was so displaced, and overwhelmed by it. Within a few weeks, it didn’t seem so big anymore, didn’t feel so foreign, but perfectly normal. Funny, how the human brain does that. Let me just coin a phrase, here, and call this Neuro-Geological Translocation Syndrome. The point is, human perception is different in initial exposure to a new environment, than it is after the environment becomes more familiar. I noticed that as my brain adjusted, my neighborhood and the surrounding areas seemed to contract; appearing not so expansive as it did when I first arrived.

That slight digression aside, I know that the same will be true when I board that plan to New Zealand, and will continue when I disembark, and on into a period of time when I arrive at the house I will be living in with my partner.

And in New Zealand, I know there will be products I don’t recognize, customs I find strange, and I will not have access to all those creature comforts and conveniences that served to soothe or steady me. I will likely make my coffee in something called a “coffee plunger” or “press pot.” Coffee grounds are dipped into a usually cylindrical carafe Kiwis call a “jug” and then a plunger presses the grounds to the bottom, and you pour the strained coffee out into your cup. Quite a different concept than the American Mr. Coffee drip brewing system, which most of us use on a daily basis. To say that there will be an adjustment period, flirts with piquant understatement.

But as I awakened this morning from a dream of reciting vows with my partner on a beach near the Moeraki Boulders, I see that the wonder and beauty of true commitment and partnership is quite capable of trumping any visceral, primal fears I have about moving through that unfamiliar landscape toward my future.  I will be free of the rat race cacophony found in the cities ( honk honk! fuck off!) and into a more idyllic and serene environment, which is more suited to my nature. I am already feeling the relief from purging all the material possessions I have carted around for so many years. It’s liberating. And yes, still frightening. But that doesn’t mean I have any intention of second-guessing the decision I made. I will do what I have to do to be with the person I have grown to love more deeply than I ever thought possible. I will face that screaming fear head-on, for the reward that it will bring. Not doubting for an instant that it is something I must do, and that I will forever be glad I did.

 

Be the first to like.

Resurrection Sticks final stages

Finished with the new novella, Resurrection Sticks, except for the final editing and getting ready for digital publishing. Then will have to format it for print publishing and go through that process, so it will be a few weeks or so before it’s available in print. But that’s the quickest I’ve ever written a novella.  Think it was about a week.

Here’s the blurb (written by Kate Genet)Rsticks_6x9frcvr_OCT12_248

It’s hard enough building a life on a new planet, but when you’re faced with dissension in your own tribe, you have to decide and decide quickly just how far you’re prepared to go.

Sivon is half Bandonese, half human. Her mother was one of ten female survivors when their craft crashed on a farm in rural Colorado. Now she is running from one of her own people, risking everything for love and the things she believes in.

Mozzik, the self-appointed leader of the Bandosapiens, has his own agenda, and Sivon has just crossed the line. He’s out to find her, to eliminate the risk she’s flirting with and to assert his control once more over the whole tribe.

But sometimes power is about more than control. Doing the right thing can be the most powerful thing in the world…as Sivon is about to find out.

If Mozzik doesn’t kill her first.

Be the first to like.

Miles to Go, but Loving the Journey

I just never know what project is going to suck me in and go somewhere. I have a whole stack of writing projects that are still awaiting my attention and I think getting them done will require the use of cloning technology–for myself. I find that the business aspects of being an Indie author is so time-consuming, it has cut way back on the time I have to actually write. I’m trying to get to a point where I’ve updated all information on my books, got them all into final draft and listed on Amazon and Smashwords and elsewhere, and then maybe I can just LEAVE THEM ALONE for once. Hoping that. Hoping.

Woman of my dreams.

And now, there is this recent move to a new place, meeting the woman of my dreams, and the impending visit to New Zealand, followed by an actual relocation there at the end of the year–possibly to reside for several years.

I try not to think far ahead enough to consider what will go in storage and what I will take with me to another country.

Everything seems to be happening at once, and I’m just trying to keep up. But I’m happier than I’ve ever been, and that is due solely to my darling Kate, who has inspired me, eliminated my creative/writing blockages, and brought hope and love and laughter back into my life. She’s everything I had ever dared hope for, and MORE. It doesn’t hurt that she’s also drop dead gorgeous and I’m wildly attracted to her!

ARsticks_6x9frcvr_OCT12_248s for my own writing endeavors, though I’ve been getting some whining about where the 3rd in the AKA Investigations series is, currently, I have been sucked in by my story, Resurrection Sticks. It was supposed to be only a short story, based on a weird dream I had. But then as I worked on it, I could see there was more there. Likely, it will be a novella. Kate has been cracking the whip for me to continue it, since she likes it so much. It is a bit of a departure for me. Call it speculative scifi.

And I’ve been cracking the whip on Kate’s new book she’s almost finished writing…(if you can call whining “Where’s the next chapter?” cracking the whip).

Building Character is already a brilliant piece of work and I can’t wait for her to finish. Her writing just keeps getting better and better. I’m so proud of her. I mean what an intriguing concept. Here’s the blurb:

Fen Marshal believes in living her life exactly as she pleases. She’s a writer and a womanizer who has her fun and walks away before anyone has a chance to want more from her. It’s not part of her plan to fall victim to obsessive lust, and as for love, well that just never enters the equation.

 

But Ruby is the woman is the woman of Fen’s dreams – literally. Fen finds herself attracted and obsessed – besotted – with a particularly delicious character from one of her own noir fiction novels.

 

It’s an obsession that brings Ruby to life – somehow, who cares how? Fen doesn’t. Fen just wants to love this creature she’s manifested through the pure strength of her imagination.

 

There’s only one problem. Ruby is not a nice character. Yes, she’s beautiful. But she’s also ruthless, possesses no heart or soul and doesn’t bleed.

 

She may just be the worst mistake Fen’s ever made.

 

How delicious is that? I’m so jealous I didn’t think of it myself.

After she gets that one done, we will have to start the marketing and publishing process on it…(and Resurrection Sticks will probably be done then, too) but we can also get back to the co-authoring of our book Hanging the Moon. Very excited about that project. I have about 100 pages and the general plot on it, and when she jumps in, we should be able to get it completed within two months.

So…lots to do, lots to think about and even more to enjoy. Finally, I feel my life is moving exactly in the direction I have always wanted it to go. And I can’t wait to write the next 26 books! Especially now that ‘ll have my writer-wife next to me, doing the same thing! It’s just a fantasy made real for any writer.

As Frost said, miles to go before I sleep… but it makes a huge difference when you’re loving the journey.

Be the first to like.

Cosmic Giggle

It’s been a busy and eventful few months. The biggest news I have mentioned, but it only gets better. Against all odds, against all logic, I have managed to meet the woman of my dreams. She is from New Zealand (who knew that my soulmate would be hiding on the opposite side of the world? Kind of a cosmic giggle, there, though I would prefer she had been nearby when this started. Like in the same country).

But be that as it may, the more time we spend getting to know each other, the more we see this magical kindredness; this inexplicable bond that can only come from two people who are meant to be together. We have many challenges ahead, but we are both sickeningly happy about the whole thing.

She is, like me, an author, and this is how we initially crossed paths. She wrote a review on one of my books and I wrote to thank her, and we exchanged some communications, and then eventually, she send just the right email, said all the right things, and a set of possibilities was born.

Now, we have become so close, so connected. I have never felt so understood, so appreciated, so adored and so loved. We are the very cliche of a whirlwind romance, and of two people who have fallen hopelessly, irretrievable in love. We have all the usual symptoms: constant, obsessive thoughts about each other, a constant need to be together (like Velcro), physical reactions to each other that are powerful even when we are not in the same room–a mere photograph or thought can engender the same response as if we were touching.  I miss her MADLY right now. She is currently at her home in New Zealand working on that book, and will be back here in July for a while.

How did I manage to get so lucky? She is intelligent, funny, witty, genuine, sincere, ethical, sensitive, creative…and it is icing on the cake that she is also incredibly beautiful. She is feminine, just quirky enough to delight me, and I have to say that the New Zealand accent is sexy as hell. (Think Lucy Lawless/Xena). She is not just some things on my list of the Ultimate Partner, but ALL THINGS on that list. I can scarcely believe my good fortune, after a life of cursing the luck fairies. Perhaps there really is some force in the universe that evens things out. My only regret is that we didn’t meet earlier. Even one complete lifetime with her would not be enough.

As many of my readers know, in the last year I have been suffering, for the first time, with writer’s block. My last two relationships sucked the creative life-force out of me somehow.  And that was capped off with betrayal and abandonment by my best friend, when I needed her the most. I still don’t understand how any of that made sense to her, but I had to find a way to move on, as painful as it was. I had not succeeded in doing that, and was circling the drain when Kate appeared. She managed to spark my creativity again, give me back those things that make my life worth living: Hope, Love, and Purpose. I knew that if I went much longer without them, I would likely not survive. So in a very real way, she has saved my life. And she has given me so much more than that. More than I ever dreamed possible. I am so proud to call her mine. She is my soulmate.

Another perk that I would have considered a scary specter, is that I am going to New Zealand at the end of the year, and will likely move there for awhile, where she has a house. I have always been fearful of getting on a plane, even more so of going out of the country. But I would board a hundred planes to be with her everyday. We will be getting married there (where it’s LEGAL), and after things are wrapped up there, we plan to return to Colorado and get a house in the mountains.

All very romantic and idyllic, and the stuff of dreams. But this is no dream. It is very real, and we both feel that we are in each others’ marrow. It’s as if we have known each other through several lifetimes, and have been searching for each other. The placard above the Door of my Life used to read, Abandon all hope, ye who enter here. Now it says Dreams really do come true. I have never felt a connection like this in my life. I adore her with every cell in my body. I finally know what it is to be truly happy….24/7. I have never felt joy like this. It has colored every other thing in my life and made it so beautiful.

Another thrilling aspect of this scenario, is that we both share the same passions–the strongest of which is the writing. We will be forming a Indie publishing business to handle all our books, soon, and are looking forward to that process.

We are also writing a book together, as well (Hanging the Moon–one that we think will be a series)…the process of which will begin in earnest after she finishes her current project, called Building Character. I managed to come up with the title for it, and she came up with a brilliant cover idea, which I rendered in anticipation of the project completion. The book is in first draft, but already, it is brilliant, and I feel it will do really well when we get it out in both print and digital form.

So, having moved to a new apartment for another year here, I will then be moving to another country–to be with my Kiwi girl, the love of my life. And the future is not just bright, but blinding–somewhat like a quasar.

Be the first to like.

Is This What it Takes?

Today, I worked on the 3rd book of the AKA Investigations series. I had to really think about what changed to make me go into that zone again–I’ve been trying so long to get there. One thing was that i just enjoyed a visit with my best friend who came to see me for 4 days. I hadn’t seen her in over 2 years. We had a great social time.

Then, while she was here, I held my first local meeting of Kindred Ink Writers Initiative (KIWI) and got to talk a lot about writing, both in the group and to a new friend who is also a writer.

Then this morning I opened my mail to the tragic news of the death of Christopher Hitchens. I kept thinking about how this brilliant mind was now gone from this earth, and how sad it was that he would never honor us with another book. And I thought about how I am still here, still alive, and still CAN write another book. And i sat down, pulled up the AKAbk3 manuscript and started making index cards of scenes and organizing them on the cork board, and updating the file. I did that all day long, only taking time out to redesign that cover for the 2nd book, which has been something I’ve put off.

So perhaps I needed the right set of inspirations to get me going again. Is this what it takes? A visit from my best friend, talking to other writers, and mourning the death of one of my favorite authors? We’ll see if I still feel inspired when I wake up tomorrow, too.

It makes me not want to go to sleep.

Be the first to like.

Switch to our mobile site